Skip to main content
Log in

Concentration-dependent inversion of antioxidant and prooxidant effects of β-carotene in tissuesin vivo

  • Biophysics and Biochemistry
  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Low doses (below 20 mg/kg) of oral β-carotene inhibit, while high doses (above 100 mg/kg) activate ascorbate-dependent LPO in rat liver and myocardial cells. Administration of β-carotene in a dose of 20 mg/kg decreased by 34% infarction zone in coronary occlusion, while the dose of 100 mg/kg was ineffective. Anin vivo concentration-dependent inversion of β-carotene from antioxidant to prooxidant in tissues is hypothesized. Pharmacological efficacy of β-carotene is determined by its antioxidant effect, while high doses provoke the prooxidant effect and can lead to negative consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yu. A. Vladimirov and A. I. Archakov,Lipid Peroxidation in Biological Membranes [in Russian], Moscow (1972).

  2. G. G. Konovalova, N. M. Cherpachenko, V. Z. Lankin,et al., Byull. Eksp. Biol. Med.,98, No. 8, 153–156 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. V. Z. Lankin and L. P. Mikheeva,Bioantioxidants [in Russian], Moscow (1975), pp. 151–156.

  4. V. W. Bowry and K. U. Ingold,J. Org. Chem.,60, 5456–5467 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. G. W. Burton and K. U. Ingold,Science,224, No. 4649, 569–573 (1984).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Kahl, S. Weinke, and H. Kappus,Antioxidants in Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Eds. I. Emmerit,et al., New York (1990), pp. 283–290.

  7. J. Kanner, H. Mendel, and P. Budowski,J. Food Sci.,42, 60–64 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. E. W. Kellog and I. Fridovich,J. Biol. Chem.,250, 8812–8817 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. I. Krinsky,Annu. Rev. Nutr.,13, 561–587 (1993).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. D. L. Morris, S. B. Kritchevsky, and C. E. Davis,JAMA,272, 1439–1441 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. G. S. Omenn, G. E. Goodman, M. D. Thornquist,et al., N. Engl. J. Med.,334, 1150–1155, (1996).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. J. E. Packer, T. F. Slater, and R. L. Willson,Nature,278, No. 5706, 737–738 (1979).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. D. K. Pandey, R. Shekelle, B. J. Selwyn,et al., J. Am. Epidemiol.,142, 1269–1278 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Peto, R. Doll, J. D. Buckley, and M. B. Sporn,Nature,290, No. 5803, 201–208 (1981).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated fromByulleten' Eksperimental'noi Biologii i Meditsiny, Vol. 128, No. 9, pp. 314–316, September, 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lankin, V.Z., Tikhaze, A.K., Konovalova, G.G. et al. Concentration-dependent inversion of antioxidant and prooxidant effects of β-carotene in tissuesin vivo . Bull Exp Biol Med 128, 930–932 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02438088

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02438088

Key Words

Navigation