Testing meat-eating in early hominids: an analysis of butchery marks on defleshed carcases
- 52 Downloads
The diet of early hominids responsible for the bone accumulations at Plio-Pleistocene sites is still a controversial issue. Meateating and bone marrow consumption are often presented either as complementary or as opposing strategies of carcass exploitation. The occurrence of cut marks on fossil bones at early sites is a potential source of information that has not been consistently used as evidence of what products hominids obtained from carcasses. Some authors interpret them as the result of manipulating meat-bearing bones, whereas others believe that they can also be the result of extracting marginal scraps of flesh that have survived carnivores’ initial consumption of carcasses. In this study, a referential framework concerning the latter process is presented and it is concluded, according to the data drawn from the FLK “Zinj” site and the results obtained in the experiment, that hominids processed meat-bearing bones (in which flesh was abundant) and not defleshed carcasses from felid kills. This work constitutes a reference that can also be used for later Pleistocene sites and adds a further dimension to the hunting-versus-scavenging debate.
Key wordsMeat-eating cut marks upper/lower limb bones mid-shaft proximal/distal shafts lions
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Binford, L. R., 1981. Bones: ancient men, modern myths. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Blumenschine, R. J., 1986. Early hominid scavenging opportunities. Implications of carcass availability in the Serengeti and Ngorongoro ecosystems. Oxford: B.A.R. International Series, 283.Google Scholar
- Blumenschine, R. J., 1991.Hominid carnivory and foraging strategies, and the socio-economic function of early archaeological sites. Philosophical Transations of the Royal Society of London, 334: 211–221.Google Scholar
- Blumenschine, R. J. & Marean C. W., 1993. A carnivorés view of archaeological bone assemblages. In (J. Hudson, ed.) From bones to behavior: Ethnoarchaeological and experimental contributions to the interpretations of faunal remains, pp. 273–300. Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
- Bunn, H. T., 1982. Meat-eating and human evolution: studies on the diet and subsistence patterns of plio-pleistocene hominids in East africa. Ph. Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
- Domínguez-Rodrigo, M., 1994.Dinámica trófica, estrategias de consumo y alteraciones óseas en la sabana africana: resumen de un proyecto de investigación etoarqueológico (1991–1993) Trabajos de Prehistoria, 51: 15–37.Google Scholar
- Domínguez-Rodrigo, M., In press.Caza y carroñeo: reflexíon, en torno a las diagnosis aplicadas al registro arqueológico. Tabona.Google Scholar
- Haynes, G., 1991. Mammoths, Mastodonts and Elephants. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Isaac, G. L., 1983. Bones in contention: competing explanations for the juxtaposition of Early Pleistocene artifacts and faunal remains. In (J. Clutton-Brock and C. Grigson, eds.) Animals and Archaeology 1. Hunters and their prey. Oxford: B.A.R. International Series, 163: 3–19.Google Scholar
- Potts, R., 1982. Lower Pleistocene Site Formation and Hominid Activities at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Ph. Dissertation. Harvard University, Massachussets.Google Scholar
- Potts, R., 1988. Early hominid activities at Olduvai. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar