Skip to main content
Log in

Gender differences in the organization of sexual information

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One widely used model of knowledge representation is that of a network in which concepts are portrayed as nodes with links between the nodes representing associations. Schvaneveldt (1990) developed a method (Pathfinder) that generates associative networks from individual's ratings of similarity of word pairs. We had 51 female and 47 male undergraduates rate for similarity all paired combinations of 16 words judged as relevant to the domain of sexuality. Using a measure of network similarity, we found that each gender's networks were more similar to each other than they were to the other gender's. Using the number of links on works as the dependent variable there were gender differences in the number of links within clusters of words, between clusters of words, and on specific words. These differences, for the most part, are consistent with gender stereotypes and prior research showing gender differences in the processing of sexual information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Byrne D., and Byrne, L. (1977).Exploring Human Sexuality, Thomas G. Crowell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. M., and Loftus, E. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic memory.Psychol Rev. 82: 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLamater, J. (1987) A sociological approach. In Geer, J. H. and O'Donohue, W. T. (eds.),Theories of Human Sexuality. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 237–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W., Byrne, D., White, L., and Kelley, K. (1988). Erotophobia-erotophilia as a dimension of personality.J. Sex Res. 25: 123–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, J. H., and Simon, W. (1973).Sexual Conduct: The Social Sources of Human Sexuality, Aldine, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. H., and Bellard, H. (in press). Sexual content induced delays in lexical decisions.Arch. Sex. Behav.

  • Geer, J. H., and McGlone, M. (1990). Sex differences in memory for erotica.Cognit. Emot. 4: 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. H., and Melton, J. S. (in press). Sexually ambiguous lexical decisions.Arch. Sex. Behav.

  • Gross, A. E. (1978). The male role and heterosexual behavior.J. Soc. Issues 34: 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, D. L. (1991). Macho men, machismo, and sexuality. In Bancroft, J., Davis, C. M. and Ruppel, H. J. J. (eds.),Annual Review of Sex Research, vol. 2, Stoyles Graphic Services, Lake Mills, IA, pp. 199–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quillian, M. (1967). Word Concepts: A theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities.Behav Sci. 12: 410–430.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G., Sigusch, V., and Schafer, S. (1973). Responses to reading erotic stories: Male-female differences.Arch. Sex. Behav. 2: 181–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schvaneveldt, R. W. (ed.). (1990).Pathfinder Associative Networks: Studies in Knowledge Organizatiion, Ablex, Norwood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1987). An evolutionary approach. In Geer, J. H., and O'Donohue, W. T. (eds.),Theories of Human Sexuality, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 91–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, J. (1976).The Social Psychology of Sex. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geer, J.H. Gender differences in the organization of sexual information. Arch Sex Behav 25, 91–107 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02437908

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02437908

Key Words

Navigation