Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 17–31 | Cite as

Physical attractiveness of girls with gender identity disorder

  • Sari R. Fridell
  • Kenneth J. Zucker
  • Susan J. Bradley
  • Dianne M. Maing


University students, masked to group status, judged the physical attractiveness of girls with gender identity disorder and clinical and normal control girls, whose photographs were taken at the time of assessment (\(\bar X\) age, 6.6 years). Each student made ratings for all girls for five traits: attractive, beautiful, cute, pretty, and ugly. A multivariate analysis of variance showed a significant group effect. Multiple comparisons of the significant univariate effects showed that the girls with gender identity disorder had significantly less attractive ratings than the normal control girls for the traits attractive, beautiful, and pretty who, in turn, had less attractive ratings than the clinical control girls. Girls with gender identity disorder and the normal controls also had less attractive ratings than the clinical controls for the trait cute. Correlational analyses showed that age was substantially negatively related to the attractiveness ratings in the group of girls with gender identity disorder, but was considerably less so in the two control groups. The extent to which the group differences in attractiveness were due to objective, structural differences in facial attractiveness vs. socially created, or subjective, processes is discussed.

Key Words

physical attractiveness gender identity disorder of childhood girls 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Achenbach, T. M., and Edelbrock C. S. (1981). Behavioral problems and competencies reported by parents of normal and disturbed children aged four through sixteen. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 46 (1 Serial No. 188).Google Scholar
  2. Adams, G. R. (1981). The effects of physical attractiveness on the socialization process. In Lucker, G. W., Ribbens, K. A., and McNamara, J. A. (eds.),Psychological Aspects of Facial Form (Monograph 11). Craniofacial Growth Series, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  3. Alley, T. R. (1993). The developmental stability of facial attractiveness: New longitudinal data and a review.Merrill-Palmer Quart. 39: 265–278.Google Scholar
  4. American Psychiatric Association. (1987).Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed., rev., APA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  5. American Psychiatric Association. (1994).Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed., APA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  6. Archer, R. P., and Cash, T. F. (1985). Physical attractiveness and maladjustment among psychiatric patients.J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 3: 170–180.Google Scholar
  7. Bailey, J. M., and Zucker, K. J. (1995). Childhood sex-typed behavior and sexual orientation: A conceptual analysis and quantitative review.Dev. Psychol. 31: 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barocas, R., and Black, H. K. (1974). Referral rate and physical attractiveness in third-grade children.Percept. Motor Skills 39: 731–734.Google Scholar
  9. Beitchman, J. H., Zucker, K. J., Hood, J. E., daCosta, G. A., and Akman, D. (1991). A review of the short-term effects of child sexual abuse.Child Abuse Neglect 15: 537–556.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berscheid, E., and Walster, E. (1974). Physical attractiveness. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 7, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Blanchard, R., and Freund, K. (1983). Measuring masculine gender identity in females.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 51: 205–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, E., and Perrett D. I. (1993). What gives a face its gender?Perception 22: 829–840.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruce, V., Burton, A. M., Hanna, E., Healey, P., Mason, O., Coombes, A., Fright, R., and Linney, A. (1993). Sex discrimination: How do we tell the difference between male and female faces?Perception 22: 131–152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., and Dench, N. (1993). What's the difference between men and women? Evidence from facial measurement.Perception 22: 153–176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cavior, N., and Howard, L. R. (1973). Facial attractiveness and juvenile delinquency among black and white offenders.J. Abn. Child Psychol. 1: 202–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dew, M. A. (1985). The effect of attitudes on inferences of homosexuality and perceived physical attractiveness in women.Sex Roles 12: 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dion, K. K. (1986). Stereotyping based on physical attractiveness: Issues and conceptual perspectives. In Herman, C. P., Zanna, M. P., and Higgins, E. T. (eds.),Physical Appearance. Stigma, and Social Behavior: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 3, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  18. Dunkle, J. H., and Francis, P. L. (1990). The role of facial masculinity/femininity in the attribution of homosexuality.Sex Roles 23: 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farina, A., Fischer, E. H., Sherman, S., Smith, W. T., Groh, T., and Mermin, P. (1977). Physical attractiveness and mental illness.J. Abn. Psychol. 86: 510–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think.Psychol. Bull. 111: 304–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gewirtz, J. L., and Hernandez, J. P. (1984).Gender can be determined from the baby's face. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.Google Scholar
  22. Gewirtz, J. L., and Hernandez, J. P. (1985).Gender can be determined from the baby's live face and from slide photographs of the baby's face. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  23. Gewirtz, J. L., Weber, R. A., and Nogueras, M. (1990).The role of facial characteristics in neonatal gender discrimination from photographs. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Conference of Infant Studies, Montreal.Google Scholar
  24. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., and Smith, M. L. (1981).Meta-Analysis in Social Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  25. Green, R. (1974).Sexual Identity Conflict in Children and Adults, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Green, R. (1987).The “Sissy Boy Syndrome” and the Development of Homosexuality, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  27. Green, R., Williams, K., and Goodman, M. (1982). Ninety-nine “tomboys” and “non-tomboys”: Behavioral contrasts and demographic similarities.Arch. Sex. Behav. 11: 247–266.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Green, R., Williams, K., and Goodman, M. (1985). Masculine or feminine gender identity in boys: Developmental differences between two diverse family groups.Sex Roles 12: 1155–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hildebrandt, K. A. (1982). The role of physical appearance in infant and child development. In Fitzgerald, H. E., Lester, B. M., and Yogman, M. W. (eds.),Theory and Research in Behavioral Pediatrics, Vol. 1, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Hildebrandt, K. A., and Fitzgerald, H. E. (1977). Gender bias in observers' perceptions of infants' sex: It's a boy most of the time!.Percept. Motor Skills 45: 472–474.Google Scholar
  31. Hildebrandt, K. A., and Fitzgerald, H. E. (1979a). Facial feature determinants of perceived infant attractiveness.Infant Behav. Dev. 2: 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hildebrandt, K. A., and Fitzgerald, H. E. (1979b). Adults' perceptions of infant sex and cuteness.Sex Roles 5: 471–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hollingshead, A. B. (1975).Four-factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  34. Jackson, L. A. (1992).Physical Appearance and Gender: Sociobiological and Sociocultural Perspectives, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
  35. Johnstone, B., Frame, C. L., and Bouman, D. (1992). Physical attractiveness and athletic and academic ability in controversial-aggressive and rejected-aggressive children.J. Soc. Clin. Psychol., 11: 71–79.Google Scholar
  36. Kennedy, J. H. (1990). Determinants of peer social status: Contributions of physical appearance, reputation, and behavior.J. Youth Adolescence, 19: 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laner, M. R., and Laner, R. H. (1980). Sexual preference or personal style? Why lesbians are disliked.J. Homosex. 5: 339–356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Langlois, J. H. (1986). From the eye of the beholder to behavioral reality: Development of social behaviors and social relations as a function of physical attractiveness. In Herman, C. P., Zanna, M. P., and Higgins, E. T. (eds.),Physical Appearance, Stigma, and Social Behavior: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 3, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  39. Langlois, J. H., and Stephan, C. W. (1981). Beauty and the beast: The role of physical attractiveness in the development of peer relations and social behavior. In Brehm, S. S., Kassin, S. M., and Gibbons, F. X. (eds.),Developmental Social Psychology: Theory and Research, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Maing, D. M. (1991).Patterns of psychopathology in sexually abused girls. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario.Google Scholar
  41. Patzer, G. L., and Burke, D. M. (1988). Physical attractiveness and child development. In Lahey, B. B., and Kazdin, A. E. (eds.),Advances in Clinical Child Psychology, Vol. 11, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Roberts, C. W., Green, R., Williams, K., and Goodman, M. (1987). Boyhood gender identity development: A statistical contrast of two family groups.Dev. Psychol. 23: 544–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rothblum, E. D. (1994). Lesbians and physical appearance: Which model applies? In Greene, B., and Herek, G. M. (eds.),Lesbian and Gay Psychology: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications, Vol. 1, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  44. Rubin, J. Z., Provenzano, F., and Luria, Z. (1974). The eye of the beholder: Parents' views on sex of newborns.Am. J. Orthopsychiat. 44: 512–519.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Salvia, J., Sheare, J. B., and Algozzine, B. (1975). Facial attractiveness and personal-social development.J. Abn. Child Psychol. 3: 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stoller, R. J. (1968).Sex and Gender. Vol. 1: The Development of Masculinity and Femininity, Science House, New York.Google Scholar
  47. Stoller, R. J. (1972). Etiological factors in female transsexualism: A first approximation.Arch. Sex. Behav. 2: 47–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stoller, R. J. (1975).Sex and Gender: Vol. 2. The Transsexual Experiment, Hogarth, London.Google Scholar
  49. Unger, R. K., Hilderbrand, M., and Madar, T. (1982). Physical attractiveness and assumptions about social deviance: Some sex-by-sex comparisons.Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 8: 293–301.Google Scholar
  50. Zucker, K. J. (1982). Childhood gender disturbance: Diagnostic issues.J. Am. Acad. Child Psychiat. 21: 274–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zucker, K. J., Wild, J., Bradley, S. J., and Lowry, C. B. (1993). Physical attractiveness of boys with gender identity disorder.Arch. Sex. Behav. 22: 23–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sari R. Fridell
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kenneth J. Zucker
    • 3
    • 5
  • Susan J. Bradley
    • 3
  • Dianne M. Maing
    • 4
  1. 1.Child and Family Studies CentreClarke Institute of PsychiatryTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Centre for Applied Cognitive Science, Ontario Institute for Studies in EducationUniversity of TorontoToronto
  3. 3.Child and Adolescent Gender Identity Clinic, Child and Family Studies CentreClarke Institute of PsychiatryTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WindsorWindsor
  5. 5.Kinark Child and Family ServicesBarrie

Personalised recommendations