Applied Mathematics and Mechanics

, Volume 24, Issue 9, pp 1051–1062 | Cite as

Controllability of a class of hybrid dynamic systems (II)—Single time-delay case

  • Xie Guang-ming
  • Wang Long
  • Ye Qing-kai
Article

Abstract

The controllability for switched linear systems with time-delay in controls is first investigated. The whole work contains three parts. This is the second part. The definition and determination of controllability of switched linear systems with single time-delay in control functions is mainly investigated. The sufficient and necessary conditions for the oneperiodic, multiple-periodic controllability of periodic-type systems and controllability of periodic systems are presented, respectively.

Key words

hybrid dynamic system switched linear system time-delay controllability controllable set switching sequence switching path 

Chinese Library Classification

TP13 TP273 O317 

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification

93B05 93B27 93C99 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Liberzon A S, Morse A S. Basic problems in stability and design of switched systems [J].IEEE Contr Syst Mag, 1999,19(5):59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Ezzine J. Haddad A H. Controllability and observability of hybrid system [J].Int J Control, 1989,49(6):2045–2055.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    SUN Zhen-dong, ZHENG Da-zhong. On reachability and stabilization of switched linear systems [J].IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2001,46(2):291–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    XIE Guang-ming, ZHENG Da-zhong. On the controllability and reachability of a class of hybrid dynamical systems [A]. In: QIN Hua-shu Ed.Proceedings of the 19 th Chinese Control Conference [C]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Engineering Counci, 2000, 114–117. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    XIE Guang-ming, WANG Long. Necessary and sufficient conditions for controllability of switched linear systems [A]. In: American Automatic Control Counci Ed.Proceedings of the American Control Conference 2002 [C]. USA: IEEE Service Center, 2002, 1897–1902.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    XU Xu-ping, Antsaklis P J. On the reachability of a class of second-order switched systems [A]. In: American Automatic Control Counci Ed.Proceedings of the American Control Conference 1999 [C]. USA: IEEE Service Center, 1999, 2955–2959.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Ishii H, Francis B A. Stabilization with control networks [J].Automatica, 2002,38(10): 1745–1751.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Ishii H, Francis B A. Stabilizing a linear system by switching control with dwell time [A]. In: American Automatic Control Counci Ed.Proceedings of the American Control Conference 2001 [C]. USA: IEEE Service Center, 2001, 1876–1881.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Morse A S. Supervisory control of families of linear set-point controllers-Part 1: Exact matching [J].IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 1996,41(7):1413–1431.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Liberzon D, Hespanha J P, Morse A S. Stability of switched systems: a Lie-algebraic condition [J].Systems and Control Letters, 1999,37(3):117–122.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Hespanha J P, Morse A S. Stability of switched systems with average dwell-time [A]. In: IEEE Control Systems Society Ed.Proceedings of the 38 th Conference on Decesion and Control[C]. USA: IEEE Customer Service, 1999, 2655–2660.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Narendra K S, Balakrishnan J. A common Lyapunov function for stable LTI systems with commuting A-matrices [J].IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 1994,39(12):2469–2471.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Narendra K S, Balakrishnan J. Adaptive control using multiple models [J].IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 1997,42(1):171–187.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Petterson S, Lennartson B. Stability and robustness for hybrid systems [A]. In: IEEE Control Systems Society Ed.Proceedings of the 35th Conference on Decesion and Control [C]. USA: IEEE Customer Service, 1996, 1202–1207.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    YE Hong, Michel A N, HOU Ling. Stability theory for hybrid dynamical systems [J].IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 1998,43(4):461–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    HU Bo, XU Xu-ping, Antsaklis P J,et al. Robust stabilizing control laws for a class of second-order switched systems [J]Systems and Control Letters, 1999,38(2):197–207.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Branicky M S. Multiple Lyapunov functions and other analysis tools for switched and hybrid systems [J].IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 1998,43(4):475–482.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Shorten R N, Narendra K S. On the stability and existence of common Lyapunov functions for stable linear switching systems [A]. In: IEEE Control Systems Society Ed.Proceedings of the 37th Conference on Decesion and Control [C]. USA: IEEE Customer Service, 1998, 3723–3724.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Johansson M, Rantzer A. Computation of piecewise quadratic Lyapunov funtions for hybrid systems [J].IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 1998,43(4):555–559.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Wicks M A, Peleties P, DeCarlo R A. Construction of piecewise Lyapunov funtions for stabilizing switched systems [A]. In: IEEE Control Systems Society Ed.Proceedings of the 33th Conference on Decesion and Control [C]. USA: IEEE Customer Service, 1994, 3492–3497.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Peleties P, DeCarlo R A. Asymptotic stability ofm-switched systems using Lyapunov-like functions [A]. In: American Automatic Control Counci Ed.Proceedings of the American Control Conference 1991 [C]. USA: IEEE Service Center, 1991, 1679–1684.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Editorial Committee of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xie Guang-ming
    • 1
  • Wang Long
    • 1
  • Ye Qing-kai
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanics and Engineering SciencePeking UniversityBeijingP. R. China

Personalised recommendations