Human Evolution

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 113–129 | Cite as

The potential effects of sex, posture and living condition on lateralized behaviors in ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta)

  • Shaw M. C. 
  • Wolfe L. D. 
  • Panger M. A. 


This research explores the effects of posture, sex, and living condition on hand and side preferences of semi-free-ranging, adult ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta) housed at the Duke University Primate Center in Durham, NC. Data were collected on 11 adult individuals (five females and six males) during normal daily activities over a ten-week period from May–July 2001. Variables analyzed in this study include unimanual behaviors (i.e., reach, hold, and limb used to start locomotion) and other potentially lateralized behaviors that do not involve handuse (i.e., whole-body turning and tail position). The data were analyzed to investigate potential individual and population level side biases for each behavior; potential sex biases in side preference for each behavior; and for ‘reach’, potential effects of posture (sitting, tripedal stance, or bipedal stance) on individual hand preferences. Additionally, to investigate potential effects of living condition on lateral biases, the data from this study were compared to data collected on the same individual Lemurs living under more restrictive living conditions during the previous year. Largely, as predicted based on available literature, we found that there was a significant sex difference across all hand-use categories and for whole-body turning, and that posture was a significant factor in the expression of hand preference for reaching. Contrary to previous research, the effect of living condition on lateral preferences was minimal, and no side preferences were found at the population level for any of the behaviors analyzed.


Lemur catta laterality hand preference handedness ringtailed lemur 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Costello M. B. and Fragaszy D. M. 1988. Prehension inCebus andSaimiri: I. Grip type and hand preference.American Journal of Primatology, 15: 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dodson D. L., Stafford D. K., Forsythe C. Seltzer C. P. and Ward J. P. 1992. Laterality in quadrapedal and bipedal prosimians: Reach and whole-body turn in the mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus) and the galago (Galago moholi).American Journal of Primatology, 26: 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Forsythe C. 1986. Hand preference in the ruffed lemur (Varecia variegata). Unpublished master’s thesis. Memphis State University.Google Scholar
  4. Forsythe C., Milliken G. W., Stafford D. K. and Ward J. P. 1988. Posturally related variations in the hand preferences of the ruffed lemur (Varecia variegata variegata).Journal of Comparative Psychology, 102: 248–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Forsythe C. and Ward J. P. 1988. Black lemur (Lemur macaco) hand preferences in food reaching.Primates, 29: 369–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gautrin D. and Ettlinger G. 1970. Lateral preferences in the monkey.Cortex, 6: 287–292.Google Scholar
  7. Geschwind N. 1985. Implications for Evolution, Genetics, and Clinical Syndromes. In Glick S.D. (ed.),Cerebral Lateralization in Nonhuman Species, Academic Press, New York, pp. 248–254.Google Scholar
  8. Glick S. D. and Shapiro R. M. 1985. Functional and Neurochemical mechanisms of cerebral lateralization in rats. In Glick S. D. (ed.),Cerebral Lateralization in Nonhuman Species, Academic Press, New York, pp. 160–170.Google Scholar
  9. Gravetter F. J. and Wallnau L. B. 1996.Statistics for the behavioral sciences, West Publishing Company, Minneaplis, pp. 585–587.Google Scholar
  10. Harris H. G. 2001. Hand and side preference in a confined group of ring-tailed lemurs. Unpublished master’s thesis. East Carolina University.Google Scholar
  11. Larson C. F., Dodson D. and Ward J. P. 1989. Hand preferences and whole-body turning biases of lesser bushbabies (Galago senegalensis).Brain and Behavioral Evolution, 33: 261–267.Google Scholar
  12. Lehman R. A. W. 1993. Manual preference in prosimians, monkeys and apes. In Ward J. P. and Hopkins W. D. (eds.),Primate Laterality, Current Behavioral, Evidence of Primate Asymmetries, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 149–182.Google Scholar
  13. MacNeilage P. F., Studdert-Kennedy M. G. and Lindblom B. 1987. Primate handedness reconsidered.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10(2): 247–303.Google Scholar
  14. Masataka N. 1989. Population-level asymmetry of hand preference in lemurs.Behaviour, 110: 244–247.Google Scholar
  15. Marchant L. F. and McGrew W. C. 1996. Laterality of limb function in wild chimpanzees of Gombe National Park: Comprehensive study of spontaneous activities.Journal of Human Evolution, 30: 427–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McGrew W.C. and Marchant L.F. 1991. Laterality of function in apes: a critical review.American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 84 (Supplement 12): 129–130.Google Scholar
  17. McGrew W. C. and Marchant L. F. 1997. On the other hand: Current issues in and meta-analysis of the behavioral laterality of hand function in nonhuman primates.Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 40: 201–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Milliken G. W., Forsythe C. and Ward J. P. 1989. Multiple measures of hand-use lateralization in the ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta).Journal of Comparative Psychology, 103: 262–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Milliken G. W., Stafford D. K., Dodson D. L., Pinger C. D. and Ward J. P. 1991. Analyses of feeding lateralization in the small-eared bushbaby (Otolemur garnettii): A comparison with the ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta).Journal of Comparative Psychoology, 105: 274–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olson D. A., Ellis J. E. and Nadler R. D. 1990. Hand preferences in captive gorillas, orangutans, and gibbons.American Journal of Primatology, 20: 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Panger M. A. 1998. Hand preference in free-ranging white-throated capuchins (Cebus capucinus) in Costa Rica.International Journal of Primatology, 19(1): 133–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pereira M. and Kappeler P. 1997. Divergent systems of agnostic behavior in Lemurid primates.Behaviour, 134: 225–274.Google Scholar
  23. Rosen G. D., Berrebi A. S., Yutzey D. A. and Denenberg V. H. 1983. Prenatal testosterone causes shift in neonatal tail posture of the rat.Developmental Brain Research, 9: 99–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sanford C. G., Guin K. and Ward J. P. 1984. Posture and laterality in the bushbaby.Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 25: 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ward J. P. 1988. Left hand reaching preferences in prosimians.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11: 732–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ward J. P., Milliken G. W., Dodson D. L., Stafford D. K. and Wallace M. 1990. Handedness as a function of sex and age in a large population ofLemur.Journal of Comparative Psychology, 104: 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ward J. P. 1991. Prosimians as animal models in the study of neural lateralization. In Kitterle F. L. (ed.),Cerebral Laterality Theory and Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  28. Ward J. P., Milliken G. W. and Stafford D. K. 1993. Patterns of lateralized behavior in prosimians. In Ward J. P. and Hopkins W. D. (eds.),Primate Laterality, Current Behavioral Evidence of Primate Asymmetries, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 43–70.Google Scholar
  29. Warren J.M. 1977. Handedness and cerebral dominance in monkeys. In Harnad S. et al. (eds.),Lateralization in the Nervous System, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute for the Study of Man 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shaw M. C. 
    • 1
  • Wolfe L. D. 
    • 2
  • Panger M. A. 
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyEast Carolina UniversityGreenvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyEast Carolina UniversityGreenvilleUSA
  3. 3.2 Department of AnthropologyGeorge Washington UniversityWashington D.C.USA

Personalised recommendations