Human Evolution

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 73–86 | Cite as

The taxonomy of neolithic man and its phylogenetic relationship to later paleolithic man and modern man in China

Article

Abstract

In approaching the taxonomy of Neolithic Man and its phylogenetic relationship to Later Paleolithic Man and Modern Man in China, the statistical methods used here are Penrose's shape distance and PCA (Principal Component Analysis). The scattergram based on principal component scores, combines the dendrogram based on Penrose's shape distance, and takes the male taxonomy into main consideration, but takes the female taxonomy — as a reference only because the differentiations in physical characteristics among male populations generally are rather larger than those among the female populations. Thus according to this scattergram, Neolithic Man in China can be divided into two large groups: the Northern China group, and the Southern China group. The theory is that in Hengzhen there exist some blood mixtures between the Southern China Group and the Northern China Group (especially the third subgroup) of Neolithic Man. Later Paleolithic Man of China — Liujiang and Upper-Cave Man — can also clearly distinguished from the rest of Neolithic Man in China in the scattergram, and can be considered as two different local types of Later Paleolithic Man. So-called “Negro-Australoid” racial traits can themselves be doubtlessly traced back to Later Paleolithic Man of China — Liujiang and Upper-cave Man. These traits are the intrinsic characteristics of Neolithic Man in China and only then is there slight difference in the extent of the manifestation of these traits in the population.

Key words

Neolithic Man Later Paleolithic Man Penrose's Shape Distance Principal component scores China 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Black D., 1928.A Study of Kansu and Honan Aeneolithic Skulls and Specimens from Later Kansu Prebistoric Sites in Comparison with North China and Other Recent Crania. Palaeontologia Sinica Series D. VI (1): 1–83.Google Scholar
  2. Chen Dezhen &Wu Xinzhi, 1985.Early Neolithic Human Skeletons from Shigu, Changge, Henan Province. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 4: 205–214, 314–323.Google Scholar
  3. Corruccini R.S., 1973.Size and Shape in Similarity Coefficients Based on Metric Characters. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 38: 743–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hanihara K., 1979.Dental Traits inAinu, Australian Aborigines, and New World Populations. In: The First Americans: Origins, Affinities, Adaptations. ed. W.S. Laughlin and A.B. Harper, Gustav Fischer New York, Stuttgart. pp. 125–134.Google Scholar
  5. Harrower G., 1928.A Study of the Crania of the Hylan Chinese. Biometrika XXB. pp. 245–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Han Kanghsin, Chang Chênpiao &Tsêng Fan, 1976.The Neolithic Human Skeletons Unearthed at T'anshin-shan in Min-hou County, Fukien Province. Acta Archaeologia Sinica, (1): 121–130.Google Scholar
  7. Han Kangxin &Pan Qifeng 1979.A study of the Human Skeletal Remains Unearthed from the Tombs of the Miaodigou II Culture at Shanxian, Henan Province, Acta Archaeologia Sinia, (2): 255–270.Google Scholar
  8. Han Kangxin &Pan Qifeng, 1982.Late Neolithic Human Skeletons from Hedang Site, Foshan, Guang Dong. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 1: 42–52.Google Scholar
  9. Han Kangxin &Pan Qifeng, 1983.Early Neolithic Human Skulls from Hemudu, Yuyao Zhejiang. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2: 124–131.Google Scholar
  10. Penrose L.S., 1954.Distance, Size and Shape. Ann. Eugen., 18: 337–343.Google Scholar
  11. Physical Anthropology Section, IAAS, 1975.Studies on the Human Skeletal Remains of the Upper Hisa-Chia-Tien Culture Unearthed at Ning-Ch'êng and ch'in-fêng. Acta Archaeologia Sinica, (2): 157–169.Google Scholar
  12. Sneath P.H.A. &Sokal R.R., 1973.Numerical Taxonomy, The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification, San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  13. Woo Jukang, 1959.Human Fossils Found in Liukiang, Kwangsi, China. Vertebrata Palasiatica 1: 97–104.Google Scholar
  14. Wu Xinzhi, 1961.Study on the Upper-cave Man of Choukoutien. Vertebrata Palasiatica, 3: 181–203.Google Scholar
  15. Yen Yin, Liu Changjhi &Gu Yumin, 1960.Report on the Skeletal Remains from the Neolithic Site at Baoji, Shensi, Vertebrata Palasiatica, 2: 33–43.Google Scholar
  16. Yen Ying & Others, 1960.Investigations of the Neolithic Human Skeletons Unearthed at Pan P'o, Sian. Archaeology, (9): 36–47.Google Scholar
  17. Yen Yen, 1962.Neolithic Human Skeletons Unearthed at Hua-Hsien, Shensi. Acta Archaeology Sinica, (2): 85–104.Google Scholar
  18. Yen Yen, 1973.The Neolithic Human Skeletal Remains from Hsi-Hsia-Hou The Chinese journal of Archaeology, (2): 91–126.Google Scholar
  19. Zhang Zhenbiao 1980.On the Racial Type of the Skulls from the Neolithic Site at Ye-Dian in Zou-Hsien County, Shantung Province. Vertebrata Palasiatica, 18: 65–75.Google Scholar
  20. Zhang Zhebiao, 1981.On the Geographical Distribution of the Physical Features of the Neolithic Population in China, Vertebrata Palasiatica, 19: 87–97.Google Scholar
  21. Zhang Zhenbiao Wang Linghong, &Ouyang Lian, 1982. Physical Patterns of Neolithic Skulls in China in View of Cluster Analysis. Vertebrata Palasiatica, 20: 72–78.Google Scholar
  22. Zhang Zhenbiao &Chen Dezhen, 1984.The Neolithic Residents Race Types at Xiawanggang. Prehistory, (1): 68–76.Google Scholar
  23. Zhang Yiyun, Wang Linghong &Dong Xingren, 1977.The Human Skulls from Zengpiyan Neolithic Site at Guilin, Guangxi. Vertebrata Palasiatica, 15: 4–13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Editrice Il Sedicesimo 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and PaleoanthropologyAcademia SinicaBeijing (28)China

Personalised recommendations