The adoption of bipedalism by the hominids: A new hypothesis
- 59 Downloads
The hypothesis is advanced that the habitual adoption of the bipedal stance and of bipedal locomotion in the hominids arose from the development of a defence mechanism, namely, the throwing of stones. It is argued that for stone-throwing to become an effective weapon, modifications to the whole post-cranial skeleton and musculature, as well as to the central nervous system are required; including the development of a low centre of gravity and a «launching platform» of relatively high mass. It is represented that hominids, from the earliest Australopithecines to modern man, exhibit modifications to the post-cranial structures that are more consonant with this hypothesis than with the interpretation that the modifications were directed initially and principally towards bipedalism. Such an interpretation is shown to create several anomalies which disappear when viewed in the context of the stated hypothesis.
The importance of the hypothesis for the evolution of Homo and especially for his brain and higher thought processes is commented upon.
Key wordshominids bipedalism evolution throwing defence brain
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bielicki T., 1984.Evolution of the intensity of feedbacks between physical and cultural evolution from man's emergence to present times. UNESCO Expert meeting on the Biological Aspects of Race, Moscow, 12–18 August 1964 (manuscript quoted by Tobias, P. V., 1982.q.v.).Google Scholar
- Dart R. A., 1950.Voluntary muscle in the human body. The double spiral arrangement. British Journal of Physical Medicine, 13: 265–268.Google Scholar
- Darwin C., 1871.Descent of Man (2nd Edition, 1913, London, John Murray).Google Scholar
- Day M. H., 1986.Bipedalism: pressures, origins and modes. In: Major topics in primate and human evolution (ed. Wood, B., Lawrence, M., Andrews, P.), Cambridge University Press, 188–202.Google Scholar
- Duchenne G. B. A., 1867.Physiologie des Mouvements (cited by Robinson, J. T., 1972q.v.).Google Scholar
- Fleagle J. C., Stern Jr J. T., Jungers W. L., Susman R. L., Vangor A. K. &Wells, J. P., 1981.Climbing: A Biomechanical Link with Brachiation and with Bipedalism. Symposium of the Zoological Society, London, 48: 359–375.Google Scholar
- Goslin B. R. &Charteris J., 1982.The human elbow and knee: Functional relationships and phylogenetic considerations. Human Biology, 54: 491–500.Google Scholar
- Lovejoy C. O., 1981.The Origin of Man. Science, 211: 4480, 341–350.Google Scholar
- New York Times, September 9th 1974 (cited in The Complete Book of Baseball, ed. Brown, G., 1980, New York, Arno Press).Google Scholar
- Poirier F. E., 1977.Fossil evidence — the Human, Evolutionary Journey. Saint Louis, C. V. Mosby.Google Scholar
- Robinson J. T., 1972.Early hominid posture and locomotion. Chicago/London, Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
- Tobias P. V., 1982.Man the tottering biped. New South Wales Committee in Postgraduate Medical Education, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
- Washburn S. L. &Howell F. C. 1960. Human evolution and culture. In: Evolution after Darwin (editor Tax, E.), 2, Chicago, Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
- Weiner J. S., 1973.Charles Darwin's Descent of Man—after 100 years. In: Human Evolution (ed. Day, M. H.), Symposium of the Society for the Study of Human Biology, 11: 1–12.Google Scholar