Advertisement

Human Evolution

, Volume 17, Issue 3–4, pp 175–185 | Cite as

Where to sit in a waiting room: density, age and gender effects on proxemic choices

  • Camperio Ciani A. 
  • Malaman M. 
Article

Abstract

We studied proxemic behaviour in an hospital waiting room by recording who chose to stand and who chose to sit and which chair, row and position. We distinguished sex and two categories of age, mature and old. We found that fenales sit together more easily than males and more frequently chose to sit close, especially mature ones. Males tend to keep more distances from neighbours by standing up. In general, proxemic behaviour in a waiting room seems to be an indicator confirming the sexual startegies in partner choice described in the evolutionary psychology paradigm.

Key words

Proxemic choices Gender study Age study Behaviour 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmed S. M. S. (1979). Invasion of personal space: a study of departure time as affected by sex of the intruder, sex of the subject, and saliency condition.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 85–86.Google Scholar
  2. Aiello J. R. (1987). Human spatial behavior, in Stokols D., Altman I.,Handbook of Environmental Psychology, vol. 2, Wiley, New York, pp. 389–504.Google Scholar
  3. Aiello J. R., Headly L. A., and Thompson D. E. (1978). Effects of crowding on the elderly: A preliminary investigation.Journal of population, 1 (4), 283–297.Google Scholar
  4. Ajdukovic D. (1988). A conurbation to the methodology of personal space research.Psychologische Beitrage, 30, 198–208.Google Scholar
  5. Altmann I. (1975).The environment and social behavior. Brooks/Cole, Montery.Google Scholar
  6. Altmann I. (1979). Property and territoriality, in Von Cranach M., Foppa K., Lepenies W. and Ploog D.,Human ethnology: claims and e limits of a new discipline, Cambridge University Press, pp. 95–132Google Scholar
  7. Argyle M. (1988) Spatial behaviour, inBodily Communication (2nd edition), Methuen & Co. Ltd, London New York, pp. 168–187.Google Scholar
  8. Argyle M. and Dean J. (1965). Eye contact, distance and affiliation.Sociometry, 28, 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baum A. Greenberg C. I. (1973). Waiting for a crowd: the behavioural and perceptual effects of anticipated crowding.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32 (4), 671–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baum A. and Koman S. (1976). Differential response to anticipated crowding: psychological effects of social and spatial density.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34 (3), 526–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baum A. and Paulus P. B. (1987). Crowding, in Stokols D., Altman I.,Handbook of Environmental Psychology, vol. 2, Wiley, New York, pp. 533–570.Google Scholar
  12. Baxter J. C. (1970). Interpersonal spacing in natural settings.Sociometry, 4, 444–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beaugrand J. P. (1989). Osservazione diretta del comportamento, in AA. VV. a cura di Robert M.,La ricerca scientifica in psicologia, Editori Laterza, Bari, pp. 187–243.Google Scholar
  14. Becker F. D. (1973). Study of spatial markers.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26 (3), 439–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bleda P. R. and Bleda S. E. (1978). Effects of sex and smoking on reaction to spatial invasion at a shopping mall.The Journal of Social Psychology, 104, 311–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bonino S., Fonzi A., Saglione G. (1982).Tra noi e gli altri: studio psicologico della distanza personale, Giunti Barbera, Firenze.Google Scholar
  17. Burgoon J. K. (1991). Relational message interpretation of touch, conversational distance, and posture.Journal of Nonverbal behavior, 15(4), 233–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Buss D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures, inBehavioural and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Buss D. M. (1994).Evolution of desire, Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  20. Buss D. M. and Schmitt D. P. (1993). Sexual strategy theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating, inPsychological Review, 100 (2), 204–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Camperio Ciani A. (1983).Ecologia e comportamento di Macaca mulatta a Simla (India): grooming e plasticità sociale, inAntropologia contemporanea, 6 (3), 275–284.Google Scholar
  22. Dobbs J. M., Stokes N. A. (1975). Beauty is power: the use of space in the sidewalk.Sociometry, 38 (4), 551–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Long A. (1970). The micro-spatial structure of the older person: some implications of planning the social and spatial environment in Pastalan L. A. & Carson D. H., Spatial behavior of older people. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  24. Eibl-Eibesfeldt (1989).Human ethology, Aldine De Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Evans G. W., Howard R. B. (1973). Personal space.Psychological Bullettin, 80 (4), 334–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fisher D. and Byrne D. (1975). Too close for comfort: sex differences in response to invasions of personal space.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32 (1), 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gifford R. and Sacilotto P. A. (1993). Social isolation and personal space: a field study.Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 25 (2), 165–174.Google Scholar
  28. Gioiella E. C. (1977). The relationships between slowness of response, state anxiety, social isolation and self-esteem and preferred personal space in the elderly.Disertation Abstract International, 38. University Microfilms, No 77-20, 743).Google Scholar
  29. Hai D. M., Khairulla Z. Y. and Coulmas N. (1982). Sex and the single armrest: use of personal space during air travel.Psychological Reports, 51, 743–749.Google Scholar
  30. Hayduk L. A. (1983). Personal space: where we now stand.Psychological Bullettin, 94, 293–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hall E. T. (1966).The hidden dimension, Doubleday, Garden City, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Hartnett J. J., Bailey G., and Gibson F. W. (1970). Personal space as influenced by sex and type movement.The journal of Psycology, 76, 139–144.Google Scholar
  33. Heshka S. and Nelson Y. (1972). Interpersonal speaking distance as a function of age, sex, and relationships.Sociometry, 35 (4), 491–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hughes J. and Goldman M. (1978). Eye contact, facial expression, sex, and violation of personal space.Perceptual and Motor Skill, 46, 579–584.Google Scholar
  35. Kenner A. N. and Katsimaglis G. 1993 Gender differences in proxemics: taxi-seat choice.Psychological Reports, 72, 625–626.Google Scholar
  36. Leibman M. (1970). The effects of sex and race norms on personal space.Environment and behavior, 2, 208–246.Google Scholar
  37. Lockard J. S., Mc Vittie R. I., and Isaac, L. M., (1977). Functional significance of the affiliative smile.Bulletin of Psychonomic Society, 9 (5), 367–370.Google Scholar
  38. Long G. T., Selby J. W., and Calhoun L. G., (1980). Effects of situational stress and sex on interpersonal distance preference.The Journal of Psycology, 105, 231–237.Google Scholar
  39. Mackintosh E., Saegert S., & West S., (1975). Two studies of crowding in urban public spaces.Environment and Behavior, 7 (2), 159–184.Google Scholar
  40. Malaman M. (1999)La scelta del posto in una sala d’attesa. Tesi di laurea in Psicologia non publicata. Universita’ di Padova.Google Scholar
  41. Martin P., Bateson P. (1989).La misurazione del comportamento, Liguori Editore, Napoli.Google Scholar
  42. Mc Burney D. H. (1986).Metodologia della ricerca in psicologia, II Mulino; Bologna.Google Scholar
  43. Mehrabian A. and Diamond S. G. (1971). Seating arrangement and conversation.Sociometry, 34 (2), 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mercer G. W., Benjamin M. L. (1980). Spatial behavior of university undergraduates in double-occupany residence rooms: an inventory effects.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10 (1), 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morris D. (1977). Segnali territoriali inL’uomo e i suoi gesti, Arnoldo Mondadori Editore, Milano, pp. 126–132.Google Scholar
  46. Polit D. and La France M. (1977). Sex differences in reaction to spatial invasion.The Journal of Social Psychology, 102, 59–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pregnolato Rotta-Loria F. (1982).Spazio e comportamento: introduzione alla prossemica, Levrotto e Bella, Torino.Google Scholar
  48. Remland M. S., Jones T. S., Brinkman H. (1991). Proxemic and haptic behavior in three european countries.Journal of Nonverbal behavior, 15 (4), 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Remland M. S., Jones T. S., Brinkman H. (1995). Interpersonal distance, body orientation, and touch: effects of culture, gender, and age.The Journal of Social Psychology, 135 (3), 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ross M., Layton B., Erickson B., and Schopler J. (1973). Affect, facial regard, and reactions to crowding.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, (1), 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rüstemli Ahmet (1991). Crowding effects of density and interpersonal distance.The journal of Social Psychology, 132 (1), 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith M. J., Reinheimer R. E., Gabbard-Alley A. (1981). Crowding, task performance, and communicative interaction in youth and old age.Human Communication Research, 7 (3), 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sommer R. (1969).Personal Space: The behavioral basis of design, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  54. Stokols D., Rall M., Pinner B., Schopler J. (1973). Phisical, social, and personal determinants of the perception of crowding.Environment and Behavior, 5, 87–115.Google Scholar
  55. Sundstrom E. (1975). An experimental study of crowding: effects of room size, intrusion, and goal blocking on nonverbal behavior, self-disclosure, and self-reported stress.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, (4), 645–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sussman N. M. and Rosenfeld M. (1978). Touch, justification, and sex: influences on the aversiveness of spatial violation.The journal of Social Psychology, 106, 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Townsend J. M., Levy G. D. (1989). Effect of potential partners’ costume and phisical attractiveness on sexuality and partner selection, inThe journal of Psychology, 124 (4), 371–389.Google Scholar
  58. Verticale M. S., Camperio Ciani A. (1995). Analisi della distribuzione prossemica tra i passeggeri dei treni.Tesi di laurea. Facoltà di Psicologia. Università degli Studi di Padova.Google Scholar
  59. Winogrond I. R., (1981). A comparison of interpersonal distancing behavior in young and elderly adults.International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 13, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute for the Study of Man 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Camperio Ciani A. 
    • 1
  • Malaman M. 
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. General PsychologyUniversity of PadovaPadovaItaly

Personalised recommendations