Skip to main content
Log in

Animal learning and intelligence

  • Published:
Human Evolution

Abstract

The ability to learn is common to most animal species: the need to exploit past experience being obviously extremely important for survival, many animals have evolved ways of coping with it. Although the complexity of learning needed for optimal survival may be different in different species, the basic mechanisms appear to be fairly constant even in phylogenetically distant ones. This homogeneity across species in learning mechanisms is in some ways surprising in view of the large phylogenetic differences and of the considerable variability not only in the general plan of their bodily structures, but also, more specifically, in their neural organization and in their behavioral adaptations. One possible explanation is that animals have acquired learning very precociously, and that the original and basic mechanisms have proved so efficient and faultproof as to be preserved from then on without any significant modification. Most researchers of the subject seem to accept the equation «intelligence=learning capability», operationally very useful because it leads to a variety of formal tests. Some researchers, stressing that behavior is subject to the same evolutionary principles as any other character of the organism and acknowledging some problems in the accepted laws of learning, have tried to find a satisfactory answer to the question of animal intelligence by attempting a synthesis between the concepts of animal learning psychology and those of ethology. To some extent, dissatisfaction with established learning theories originated within the theories themselves: the study of phenomena such as autoshaping, selective attention, preferential learning of some responses amongst the many possible, conditioned learning of taste aversions, etc. Further difficulties for conditioning theories arose from the discovery of ethological phenomena. Other researchers have attempted to check the hypothesis that animals possess cognition. A number of complex experimental situtations have been devised to this purpose, but the results still are far from conclusive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson J.R., 1984.Monkeys with mirrors: some questions for primate psychology. International Journal of Primatology, 5: 81–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach F.A., 1950.The snark was a Boojum. American Psychologist, 5: 115–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitterman M.E., 1972.Comparative studies of the role of inhibition in reversal learning. In: Boakes R.A. & Halliday M.S., eds. Inhibition and Learning. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitterman M.E., 1975.The comparative analysis of learning. Science, 88: 699–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitterman M.E., 1976.Issues in the comparative psychology of learning. In: Masterton R.B., Bitterman M.E., Campbell C.B.G. & Hotton N., eds. Evolution of Brain and Behavior in Vertebrates. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitterman M.E., LoLordo V.M., Overmier J.B. &Rashotte M.E., 1979.Animal Learning: Survey and Analysis, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitterman M.E. &Woodward W.T., 1976.Vertebrate learning: common processes. In: Masterton R.B., Bitterman M.E., Campbell C.B.G. & Hotton, N., eds. Evolution of Brain and Behavior in Vertebrates. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boakes R.A. &Gaertner I., 1977.The development of a simple form of communication. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29: 561–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolles R.C., 1970.Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning. Psychological Review, 77: 32–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolles R.C., 1975.Learning Theory. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolles R.C., 1978.The role of stimulus learning in defensive behavior. In: Hulse S.H., Fowler H. & Honig W.K., eds. Cognitive Processes in Animal Behavior. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braveman N.S. & Bronstein P. (eds.), 1985.Experimental Assessment and Clinical Applications of Conditioned Food Aversions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences vol. 443.

  • Brown P.L. &Jenkins H.M., 1968.Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key peck. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis H. &Memmott J., 1982.Counting behavior in animals: a critical evaluation. Psychological Bulletin, 92: 547–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis H., Memmott J. &Hurwitz H.M.B., 1975.Autocontingencies: a model for subtle behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104: 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domjan M., 1981.Ingestional aversion learning: unique and general processes. In: Rosenblatt J.J., Hinde R.A., Beer C. & Busnel M.C., eds. Advances in the Study of Behavior, vol. 11. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards C.A., Jagielo J.A. &Zentall T.R., 1983.«Same/different» symbol use by pigeons. Animal Learning and Behavior, 11: 349–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein R., Kirshnit C.E., Lanza R.P. &Rubin L.C., 1984.Insight in the pigeon: antecedents and determinants of an intelligent performance. Nature, 308: 61–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein R., Lanza R.P. &Skinner B.F., 1980.Symbolic communication between two pigeons (Columba livia domestica). Science, 207: 543–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein R., Lanza R.P., &Skinner B.F., 1981.«Self-awareness» in the pigeon. Science, 212: 695–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantino E. &Logan C.A., 1979.The Experimental Analysis of Behavior. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes D.M. &Church R.M., 1982.Discrimination of the number of sequential events by rats. Animal Learning and Behavior, 10/2, 171–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup G.G., 1970.Chimpanzees: self-recognition. Science, 167: 86–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup G.G., 1982.Self-awareness and the emergence of mind in primates. American Journal of Primatology, 2: 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup G.G., 1983.Toward a comparative psychology of mind. In: Mellgren R.L. ed. Animal Cognition and Behavior. North Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamzu E. &Schwartz B., 1976.The maintenance of key-pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 19: 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia J. &Koelling R.A., 1966.Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning. Psychonomic Science, 4: 123–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin D.R. (ed.), 1982.Animal Mind — Human Mind. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearst E., 1978.Stimulus relationships and feature selection in learning and behavior. In: Hulse S.H., Fowler H. & Honig W.K., eds. Cognitive Processes in Animal Behavior. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearst E. &Jenkins H.M., 1974.Sign-tracking: the stimulus-reinforcer relation and directed action. Psychonomic Society Press, Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein R.J. &de Villiers P.A., 1980.Fish as a natural category for people and pigeons. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 14. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde R.A. &Stevenson-Hinde J., (eds.), 1973.Constraints on Learning. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hineline P.N. &Rachlin H., 1969.Escape and avoidance of shock by pigeons pecking a key. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12: 533–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodos W., 1982.Some perspectives on the evolution of intelligence and the brain. In: Griffin D.R., ed. Animal Mind — Human Mind. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodos W. &Campbell C.B.G., 1969.Scala Naturae: why there is no theory in comparative psychology. Psychological Review, 76: 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honig W. 1978.On the conceptual nature of cognitive terms: an initial essay. In: Hulse S.H., Fowler H. & Honig W.K., Eds. Cognitive Processes in Animal Behavior. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imada H. &Nageishi Y., 1982.The concept of uncertainty in animal experiments using aversive stimulation. Psychological Bulletin, 91: 171–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imada H., Shuku H. &Moriya M., 1983.Can a rat count? Animal Learning and Behavior, 11 396–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itani J., 1965.On the acquisition and propagation of a new food habit in the troop of Japanese monkey at Takasakiyama. In: Imanishi K. & Altmann S.A., eds. Japanese Monkeys. Emory University Press, Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalat J.W., 1977.Biological significance in food aversion learning. In: Milgram N.W., Krames L. & Alloway T.M., eds. Food Aversion Learning. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawai M., 1965.Newly acquired precultural behavior of the natural troop of Japanese monkeys on Koshima Islet. Primates, 8: 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kling J.W. &Stevenson-Hinde J., 1977.Reinforcement, extinction and spontaneous recovery of key-pecking in chaffinches. Animal Behavior, 23: 424–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanza R.P., Starr J. &Skinner, B.F., 1982.«Lying» in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38: 201–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockardt R.B., 1971.Reflections on the fall of comparative psychology: is there a message for us all? American Psychologist, 51: 168–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locurto C.M., Terrace H.S. &Gibbon J. (eds.), 1981.Autoshaping and conditioning theory. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • LoLordo V.M., 1979.Constraints on learning. In: Bitterman M.E., Lolordo V.M., Overmier, J.B., Rashotte M.E., Animal Learning: Survey and Analysis. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • LoLordo V.M. &Jacobs W.J., 1983.Constraints on aversive conditioning in the rat: some theorethical accounts. In: Zeiler M.D., Harzem P., eds. Biological Factors in Learning. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski D. &MacCorquodale K., 1984.«Symbolic communication» between two pigeons (Columbia Livia) without unconditioned reinforcement. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 98: 372–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh N.J., 1973.Stimulus selection: learning to ignore stimuli that predict no change in reinforcement. In: Hinde R.A., Stevenson-Hinde J., eds. Constraints on Learning. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh N.J., 1983.Conditioning and Associative Learning. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuzawa T., 1985.Use of numbers by a chimpanzee. Nature, 315: 57–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGonigle B., 1985.Can apes learn to count? Nature, 315: 16–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram N.W., Krames L. &Alloway T.M (eds.), 1977.Food Aversion Learning. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millard W.J., Deutsch-Klein N. &Glendon F.M., 1981.«Communication» in the pigeon. Behavior Analysis Letters, 11: 305–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisacreta R. &Witt K., 1983.Same-different discrimination in the pigeon. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21: 411–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli M. &Motta M., 1979.Analisi sperimentale delle relazioni tra Behavioral Contrast e risposta consumatoria. Ricerche di Psicologia, 9: 69–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli M., Prato Previde E. &Gerli M., 1984.Contrasto comportamentale nel ratto con due tipi di risposta. Ricerche di Psicologia, 14: 2–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack D., 1976.Intelligence in ape and man. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack D. &Woodruff G., 1978.Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4: 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds G.S. 1961.Behavioral Contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 457–471.

  • Rozin P. 1976.The selection of foods by rats, humans, and other animals. In: Rosenblatt J.J., Hinde R.A., Shaw E., Beer C., eds. Advances in the Study of Behavior, vol. 6. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubu L.M., 1984.An investigation of number-concept appreciation in a rhesus monkey. Primates, 25: 236–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shettleworth S.J., 1973.Food reinforcement and the organization of behavior in golden hamsters. In: Hinde R.A., Stevenson-Hinde J., eds. Constraints on Learning. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shettleworth S.J. 1983.Function and mechanisms in learning. In: Zeiler M.D., Harzem P., eds. Biological Factors in Learning. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson J., 1967.Reinforcing effects of chaffinch song. Animal Behavior, 15: 427–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson J., 1969.Song as a reinforcer. In: Hinde R.A., ed. Bird Vocalizations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez S.D. &Gallup G.G., 1981.Self-recognition in chimpanzees and orangutans, but not gorillas. Journal of Human Evolution, 10: 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcoxon H.C., Dragoin W.B. &Kraal P.A., 1971.Illness-induced aversions in rat and quail: relative salience of gustatory and visual cues. Science, 171: 826–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams D.R. &Williams H., 1969.Auto-Maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12: 511–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff G. &Premack D., 1979.Intentional communication in the chimpanzee: the development of deception. Cognition, 7: 333–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright A.A., Santiago H.C., Urcuioli P.J., Sands S.F., 1984.Monkey and pigeon acquisition of same/different concept using pictorial stimuli. In: Commons M.L., Herrnstein R.J., Wagner A.R., eds. Quantitative Analyses of Behavior, vol. 4. Ballinger, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall T.R., Edwards C.E., Hogan D.E., 1984.Pigeons' use of identity. In: Commons M.L., Herrnstein R.J., Wagner A.R., eds. Quantitative analyses of behavior. Acquisition II. Ballinger, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall T.R. &Hogan D.E., 1974.Abstract concept learning in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102: 393–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zental T.R. &Hogan D.E., 1978.Same/different concept learning in the pigeon: the effect of negative instances and prior adaptation to the transfer stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 30: 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poli, M.D. Animal learning and intelligence. Hum. Evol. 3, 487–502 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02436334

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02436334

Key words

Navigation