Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The history of the genusHomo

  • Published:
Human Evolution

Abstract

The genusHomo was established by Carolus Linnaeus in 1758. During the course of the past 150 years, the addition of fossil species to the genusHomo has resulted in a genus that, according to the taxonomic interpretation, could span as much time as 2.5 Myr, and include as many as ten species. This paper reviews the fossil evidence for each of the species involved, and sets out the case for their inclusion inHomo. It suggests that while the case for the inclusion of some species in the genus (e.g.Homo erectus) is well-supported, in the case of two of the species,Homo habilis andHomo rudolfensis, the case for their inclusion is much weaker. Neither the cladistic evidence, nor evidence about adaptation suggest a particularly close relationship with laterHomo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexeev, V.P. 1986.The origin of the human race. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermudez de Castro, J.M., Arsuaga, J.L., Carbonell, E., Rosas, A., Martinez, I., and Mosqueria, M. 1997.A hominid from the Lower Pleistocene of Atapuerca, Spain: Possible Ancestor to Neandertals and Modern Humans. Science, 276:1392–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. 1927.On a lower molar hominid tooth from the Chou Kou Tien deposit. Palaeontologicia Sinica, New Series D, 7:1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauer, G. 1992.Africa’s place in the evolution of Homo sapiens. In: Continuity and Replacement: controversies inHomo sapiens evolution (eds. Brauer, G. and Smith, F.H.) pp. 83–98. Balkema: Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauer, G. 1994.How different are Asian and African Homo erectus? In: 100 years ofPithecanthropus. TheHomo erectus problem (ed. J.L. Franzen), Courier. Forschungs-Institut Senckenberg, 171:301–318.

  • Brauer, G. and Mbua, E. 1992. Homo erectusfeatures used in cladistics and their variability in Asian and African Hominids. Journal of Human Evolution, 22:79–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brauer, G., Yokoyama, Y., Falgueres, C. and Mbua, E. 1997.Modern human origins backdated. Nature, 386:337–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busk, G. 1865.On a very ancient cranium from Gibraltar. Report of the British Association Advancement of Science, (Bath, 1864):91–92.

  • Clark, J.D., de Heinzelin, J., Schick, K.D., Hart, W.K., White, T.D., Wolde Gabriel, G., Walter, R.C., Suwa, G., Asfaw, B., Vrba, E. and H. Selassie, Y. 1994.African

  • Homo erectus:old radiometric ages and young Oldowan assemblages in the Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia. Science, 264:1907–1910.

  • Dubois, E. 1892.Palaeontogische anderzoekingen op Java, inVerslag van het Mijnwezen. Batavia, 3:10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, R.A. and Lahr, M.M. 1992.Beyond “out of Africa”: reassessing the origins of Homo sapiens. Journal of Human Evolution, 22:523–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, C.P. and Mazák, V. 1975.An approach to the taxonomy of the Hominidae: Gracile Villafranchian hominids of Africa. Casopis Pro Mineralogii A Geologii, 20:225–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig-Schrerer, S., and Martin, R.D. 1991.Was ‘Lucy’ more human than her child? Observations on early hominid postcranial specimens. Journal of Human Evolution, 21:439–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrdlicka, A. 1927.The Neanderthal phase of man. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 57:249–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hublin, J.J., Ruiz, C.B., Lara, P.M., Fontugne, M., and Reyss, J.-L. 1995.The Mousterian site of Zafarraya (Andalucia, Spain): dating and implications of the peopling processes of Western Europe. Comptes Rendus Academie des Sciences Paris (Series II a), 321:931–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelínek, J. 1978. Homo erectusor Homo sapiens? Recent advances in Primatology, 3:419–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, A. 1912.Ancient Types of Man. Harper: London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G.E. 1999.Is “Homo rudolfensis”a valid species? Journal of Human Evolution, 36:

  • King, W. 1864.The reputed fossil man of the Neanderthal. Quarterly Journal of Science, 1:88–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, A. 1993.Human taxonomic diversity in the Pleistocene: does Homo erectusrepresent multiple hominid species? American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 91:161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahr, M.M. and Foley, R.A. 1994.Multiple dispersals and modern human origins. Evolutionary Anthropology, 3(2):48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leakey, L.S.B., Tobias, P.V., and Napier, J.R. 1964.A new species of the genus Homofrom Olduvai Gorge. Nature, 202:7–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Gros Clark, W.E. 1955.The fossil evidence for Human Evolution. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus, C. 1758.Systema Naturae. Laurentii Salvii: Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1944.On the concepts and terminology of vertical subspecies and species. National Research Council Bulletin, 262:11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1950.Taxonomic categories in fossil hominids. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 15:109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmerling, P.C. 1833.Recherches sur des ossements fossiles decouverts dans les cavernes de la province de Liege, Liege, pp. 59–62.

  • Schoetensack, O. 1908.Der Unterkiefer des Homo heidelbergensisaus den Sanden von Mauer bei Heidelberg. Leipzig, 1908:1–6.

  • Semaw, S., Renne, P., Harris, J.W.K., Feibel, C.S., Bernor, R.L., Fesseha, N. and Mowbray, K. 1997.2.5-million-year-old stone tools from Gona, Ethiopia. Nature, 385:333–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, A., Grün, R., Martinez, G. N.A., Simpson, J.J., McCulloch, M., Taylor, L. and Curnoe, D.Australia’s oldest human remains: age of the Lake Mungo 3 skeleton. Journal of Human Evolution, 36:591–612.

  • Topinard, P. 1890.Anthropology. Chapman and Hall: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A. and Chamberlain, A.T. 1989.Speciation, morphological change and the status of African Homo erectus. Journal of Human Evolution, 18:115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpoff, M.H., Thorne, A.G., Jelinek, J. and Zhang, Y. 1994.The case for sinking Homo erectus. 100 years of Pithecanthropus is enough. Courier Forschungs-Institut Senckenberg, 171:341–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B.A. 1992.Origin and evolution of the genus Homo. Nature, 355:783–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B.A. 1994.Taxonomy and evolutionary relationships of Homo erectus. Courier Forschungs-Institut Senckenberg, 171:159–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B.A. 1999. ‘Homo rudolfensis’Alexeev, 1986 — fact or phantom? Journal of Human Evolution, 36:115–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B. and Collard, M. 1999a.The Human Genus. Science, 284:65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B. and Collard, M. 1999b.The changing face of Homo. Evolutionary Anthropology, in press.

  • Woodward, A.S. 1938.A fossil skull of an ancestral Bushman from the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan. Antiquity, 12:193–195.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University, 2110 G Street, NW, 20052, Washington D.C.

    B. A. Wood

Authors
  1. B. A. Wood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wood, B.A. The history of the genusHomo . Hum. Evol. 15, 39–49 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02436233

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02436233

Key Words

Search

Navigation