Skip to main content
Log in

Nonstandard (non-σ-additive) probabilities in algebraic quantum field theory

  • Published:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditionally, physicists deduce the observational (physical) meaning of probabilistic predictions from the implicit assumption that thewell-defined events whose probabilities are 0 never occur. For example, the conclusion that in a potentially infinite sequence of identical experiments with probability 0.5 (like coin tossing) the frequency of heads tends to 0.5 follows from the theorem that sequences for which the frequencies do not tend to 0.5 occur with probability 0. Similarly, the conclusion that in quantum mechanics, measuring a quantity always results in a number from its spectrum is justified by the fact that the probability of getting a number outside the spectrum is 0. In the mid-60s, a consistent formalization of this assumption was proposed by Kolmogorov and Martin-Löf, who defined arandom element of a probability space as an element that does not belong to any definable set of probability 0 (definable in some reasonable sense). This formalization is based on the fact that traditional probability measures are σ-additive, i.e., that the union of countably many sets of probability 0 has measure 0. In quantum mechanics with infinitely many degrees of freedom (e.g., in quantum field theory) and in statistical physics one must often consider non-σ-additive measures, for which the Martin-Löf's definition does not apply. Many such measures can be defined as “limits” of standard probability distributions. In this paper, we formalize the notion of a random element for such finitely-additive probability measures, and thus explain the observational (physical) meaning of such probabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benioff, P. A. (1976). Models of Zermelo Frankel set theory as carriers for the mathematics of physics. I, II,Journal of Mathematical Physics,17, 618–628, 629–640.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1977).Applied Nonstandard Analysis, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. E. (1995).Functional Analysis: Theory and Applications, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emch, G. G. (1972).Algebraic Methods in Statistical Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emch, G. G. (1984).Mathematical and Conceptual Foundations of 20th-Century Physics, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, D. (1996).Quantum Relativity, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein D., and Gibbs, J. M. (1993). Quantum relativity,International Journal of Theoretical Physics,32, 1801.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan, J. A. (1983).Bayes Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, D., and Sudderth, W. (1978). On finitely additive priors, coherence, and extended admissibility,Annals of Statistics,6, 333–345.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kreinovich, V. (1980). A review of J. J. Keisler et al. (eds.),Selected papers of Abraham Robinson, Vol. 2.North Holland, Amsterdam 1980,Zentralblatt fúr Mathematik,424, 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreinovich, V., and Longpré, L. (1996). Unreasonable effectiveness of symmetry in physics,International Journal of Theoretical Physics,35, 1549–1555.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Landau L. D., and Lifschitz, E. M. (1965).Quantum Mechanics: Non-relativistic Theory, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., and Vitányi, P. (1997).An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Löf, P. (1966). The definition of random sequences,Information and Control,9, 602–619.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rényi, A. (1970).Foundations of Probability, Holden-Day, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. (1974)Non-Standard Analysis, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A., and Keleman, P. J.Journal of Mathematical Physics, (1972)13, 1870–1874, 1875–1878.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ruelle, D. (1978).Thermodynamic Formalism: The Mathematical Structures of Classical Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schervish, M. J., Seidenfeld, T., and Kadane, J. D. (1984). The extent of nonconglomerability of finitely additive probability,Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichskeittheorie und Verwandte Gebiete,66, 205–226.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wightman, A. S. (1976). Hilbert's sixth problem: Mathematical treatment of the axioms of physics, inMathematical Developments Arising from Hilbert Problems, F. E. Browder, ed., American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, pp. 147–240.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kreinovich, V., Longpré, L. Nonstandard (non-σ-additive) probabilities in algebraic quantum field theory. Int J Theor Phys 36, 1601–1615 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435759

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435759

Keywords

Navigation