Advertisement

Human Evolution

, 4:97 | Cite as

Speciation and the evolution of behaviour in prosimians

  • G. A. Doyle
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

A mechanism is suggested, based on a biphasic approach-withdrawal theory proposed byT. C. Schneirla, to account for how behaviours may be selected by environmental forces for transmission over generations. The basic postulates of Schneirla's theory are presented followed by an examination of some aspects of lorisid behaviour in the light of this theory.

Key words

approach-withdrawal theory lorisid behaviour 

References

  1. Andersson A. B., 1969.Communication in the lesser bushbaby (Galago senegalensis moboli). Unpublished M. Sc. dissertation. University of the witwatersrand.Google Scholar
  2. Andrew R. J., 1963.The origin and evolution of the calls and facial expressions of primates. Behaviour, 20: 1–109.Google Scholar
  3. Bearder S. K., 1969.Territorial and intergroup behaviour of the lesser bushbaby, Galago senegalensis moboli (A. Smith) in semi-natural conditions and in the field. Unpulished M. Sc. dissertation. University of the Witwartersrand.Google Scholar
  4. Bearder S. K., 1974.Aspects of the ecology and behaviour of the thick-tailed bushbaby Galago crassicaudatus. Unpublished Ph. D. thesis University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
  5. Charles-Dominique, P., 1971.Eco-éthologie des prosimiens du Gabon. Biologica Gabonica, 7: 121–228.Google Scholar
  6. Charles-Dominique P., 1977.Ecology and Behaviour of Nocturnal Primates: Prosimians of Equatorial West Africa. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Collias N., &Joos N., 1953.The spectrographic analysis of sound signals of the domestic fowl. Behaviour, 5: 175–178.Google Scholar
  8. D'amato M. R. &Jogoda H., 1962.Effect of early exposure to photic stimulation on brightness discrimination and exploratory behavior. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 101: 267–271.Google Scholar
  9. Darwin C., 872.The expression of emotions in man and animals. London: Murray.Google Scholar
  10. Doyle G. A., 1978.Discussion of behavioural factors in prosimian evolution. In (D. J. Chivers and K. A. Joysey, eds.) Recent advances in primatology, Vol. 3: Evolution, pp. 151–157. New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Ewer R. F., 1958.Ethology of Mammals. London: Logos Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fabricius E. &Boyd H., 1954.Experiments of the following-reaction of ducklings. Reports of the Wildfowl Trust, 6: 84–89.Google Scholar
  13. Hinde R. A., 1970.Animal behaviour: A Synthesis of Ethology and Comparative Psychology. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Jewell P. A. &Oates J. F., 1969.Ecological observations on the lorisoid primates of African lowland forest. Zoologica Africana, 4: 231–238.Google Scholar
  15. Jolly A., 1966.Lemur behavior: a Madagascar field study. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Klopfer P. H. 1973.Does Behavior Evolve? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 223: 113–119.Google Scholar
  17. Kummer H., 1970.Behavioral characters in primate taxonomy. In (J. R. Napier and P. H. Napier, eds.). Old world monkeys: evolution, systematics and behavior, pp. 25–36. New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Maier N. R. F. &Schneirla T. C., 1935.Principles of animal psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  19. Martin R. D., 1979.Phylogenetic aspects of prosimian behavior. In (G. A. Doyle & R. D. Martin, eds.). The study of prosimian behavior, pp. 45–77. New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Moynihan M., 1973.The evolution of behavior and the role of behavior in evolution. Breviora, No. 415: 1–29.Google Scholar
  21. Napier J. R. &Walker A. C., 1967.Vertical clinging and leaping — a newly recognised category or locomotor behaviour of primates. Folia primatologica, 6: 180–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Petter J.-J., 1962.Recherches sur l'écologie et l'éthologie des lémuriens malgaches. Mémoires du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle Paris, série A, 27: 1–146.Google Scholar
  23. Petter J.-J. &Hladik C. M., 1970.Observations sur le domaine vital et la densité de la population de Loris tardigradus dans le forêts de Ceylan. Mammalia, 3: 394–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schaller G. B. &Emlen J., J. T., 1963.The ontogeny of avoidance behaviour in some precocial birds. Animal Behaviour, 10: 370–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schneirla T. C., 1939.A theoretical consideration of the basis for approach-withdrawal ajustments in behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 37: 501–502.Google Scholar
  26. Schneirla T. C., 1957.Theoretical consideration of cyclic processes of doryline ants. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 101 (1): 106–133.Google Scholar
  27. Schneirla T. C., 1959.An evolutionary and developmental theory of biphasic processes underlying approach and withdrawal. In (M. R. Jones, ed.). Nebraska symposium on motivation 7, pp. 1–42. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  28. Schneirla T. C., 1965.Aspects of stimulation and organization in approach/withdrawal processes underlying vertebrate behavioral development. In (D. S. Lehrman, R. A. Hinde & E. Shaw, eds.) Advances in the study of behavior, Vol. 1 pp. 1–71. New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
  29. Simons E. L., 1962.Fossil evidence relating to the early evolution of primate behavior. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 102: 282–294.Google Scholar
  30. Walk R. D. &Gibson E., 1961.A comparative and analytic study of visual depth perception. Psychological Monographs, 75 (17): 1–44.Google Scholar
  31. Walker A. C., 1969.The locomotion of the lorises with special reference to the potto. East African Wildlife Journal, 7: 1–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Editrice II Sedicesimo 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. A. Doyle
    • 1
  1. 1.Primate Behaviour Research GroupUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations