Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine

, Volume 129, Issue 1, pp 44–46 | Cite as

Lactate and succinate dehydrogenase activity in blood lymphocytes of aggressive and submissive male mice

  • N. I. Gryazeva
  • A. V. Shurlygina
  • L. V. Verbitskaya
  • E. V. Mel'nikova
  • N. N. Kudryavtseva
  • V. A. Trufakin
Biophysics and Biochemistry
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

The influence of social status on some immunological characteristics in experimental animals was studied (sensory contact model). Lactate dehydrogenase activity in blood lymphocytes changed similarly in aggressive and submissive mice probably due to social stress. The activity of succinate dehydrogenase changed differently and correlated with the type of social behavior.

Key Words

lactate dehydrogenase succinate dehydrogenase lymphocytes immune state antagonistic behavior 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    N. I. Gryazeva, M. V. Robinson, and V. A. Trufakin,Byull. Sib. Otd. Ros. Akad. Med. Nauk., No. 4, 45–47 (1994).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. I. Gryazeva, M. V. Robinson, N. N. Barykina,et al., Byull Eksp. Biol. Med.,125, No. 5, 555–557 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. V. Idova, T. A. Pavina, E. L. Al'perina, and L. V. Devoino,Ros. Fiziol. Zh.,84, No. 4, 380–384 (1998).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. N. Kudryavtseva and I. V. Bakishtanovskaya,Zh. Vyssh. Nervn. Deyat.,41, No. 5, 459–466 (1991).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. E. Margolina,Pediatrie [in Russian], No. 2, 24–27 (1981).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. V. Men'shikov, L. N. Delektorskaya, R. P. Zolotnitskaya,et al., Laboratory Techniques in Clinics [in Russian], Moscow (1987).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. P. Nartsissov,Arkhive Anat.,56, No. 5, 89–91 (1969).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neurochemistry, Eds. I. P. Ashmarin and P. V. Stukalov [in Russian], Moscow (1996).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. A. Popova, S. I. Il'nitskaya, L. A. Kolesnikova,et al., Ros. Fiziol. Zh.,82, No. 12, 14–19 (1996).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Yu. Sarkisova, L. V. Nozdracheva, and M. A. Kulikov,Zh. Vyssh. Nervn. Deyat.,41, No. 5, 963–972 (1991).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. I. Chikovani, A. A. Arkhipova, S. V. Petrichuk, and R. P. Nartsissov,Pediatriya, No. 11, 17–18 (1981).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. M. Shishchenko, G. F. Suslova, and R. P. Nartsissov,Arkhive Anat.,66, No. 3, 90–92 (1974).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. V. Devoino, E. L. Alperina, N. N. Kudryavtseva, and N. K. Popova,Brain Behav. Immun., No. 7, 91–96 (1993).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. I. Gryazeva
    • 1
  • A. V. Shurlygina
    • 1
  • L. V. Verbitskaya
    • 1
  • E. V. Mel'nikova
    • 1
  • N. N. Kudryavtseva
    • 1
  • V. A. Trufakin
    • 1
  1. 1.Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Medical SciencesInstitute of Clinical and Experimental LymphologyNovosibirsk

Personalised recommendations