Advertisement

Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 347–352 | Cite as

Biochemical and cytological analyses in natural populations ofVicia benghalensis L.

Evidence for two distinct groups
  • Angela Rosa Piergiovanni
  • Incoronata Galasso
  • Pietro Perrino
  • Domenico Pignone
Regular research papers

Summary

27 accessions ofVicia benghalensis from different geographical origins constitute the pool on which the present study was performed. Genetic variation among the samples was biochemically and cytologically evaluated: seed storage protein profiles and C-banded karyotypes were analysed from single individuals of each accession.

SDS-PAGE has shown the possibility to divide the samples into two groups, each characterized by specific protein profiles. The two patterns were indicated as A and B. From individual seed electrophoresis it was ascertained that samples possessing the pattern A showed a low level of individual variation, while those possessing the pattern B were highly polymorphic, thus suggesting differences in the allogamic rate.

The cytological analysis demonstrated the presence of two groups of accessions, one being much richer in heterochromatin as evidenced by C-banding (H+) than the other (H-). The analysis of biochemical and karyological data showed a constant association between pattern A and karyotype H and between pattern B and karyotype H+.

On the basis of these results it is proposed to considerV. benghalensis as a highly heteromorphic species, in which two groups may be identified.

Key word

sheterochromatin rate of allogamy microevolution seed proteins Vicia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdalla, M.M.F., 1977. Intraspecific unilateral incompatibility inVicia faba L. Theor. Appl. Genet., 50: 227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball, P.W., 1968.Vicia L. In: T.G. Tutin, V.H. Heywood, N.A. Burges, D.M. Moore, D.H. Valentine, S.M. Walters & D.A. Webb (Eds.). Flora Europaea, Cambridge Univ. Press, London, pp. 129–136.Google Scholar
  3. Blanco, A., P. Perrino & E. Porceddu, 1975. Accertamento del numero cromosomico e osservazione sul cariotipo di circa 600 accessioni di una collezione del genereVicia. Genet. Agr., 29: 259–267.Google Scholar
  4. Boulter, D., D. Thruman & E. Derbyshire, 1967. A disc electrophoretic study of globulin in proteins of legume seeds with reference to their systematics. New Phytol., 66: 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chooi, W.Y., 1971. Variation in nuclear DNA content in the genusVicia. Genetics, 68: 195–211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cremonini, R., N. Colonna, A. Stefani, I. Galasso & D. Pignone, 1994. Nuclear DNA content, chromatin organization and chromosome banding in Dasypyrum villosum (L.) P. Candargy. Heredity, 72: 365–373.Google Scholar
  7. Cremonini, R., S. Funari & S. Mazzucca, 1992. Cytology ofVicia species: nuclear structure, karyological analysis and DNA content. Chromatin, 1: 135–146.Google Scholar
  8. Delre, V., C. De Pace, F. Maggini & R. Mancini, 1988. Evidence on the rRNA spacer length polymorphismVicia faba and related species. Genet. Agr., 42: 71–72.Google Scholar
  9. Furuta, Y. & K. Nishikawa, 1991. Variation in nuclear and individual chromosomal DNA content and its role in evolution of plants. In: P.K. Gupta & T. Tsuchiya (Eds.). Chromosome engineering in plants: genetics, breeding, evolution, part A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 71–85.Google Scholar
  10. Galasso, I., A.R. Piergiovanni, R. Cremonini, P. Perrino & D. Pignone, 1994. Cytology ofVicia species. III. Characterization of the chromosomal chromatin of some species of the sectionCracca. Cytobios, 77:175–182.Google Scholar
  11. Gepts, P., T.C. Osborn, K. Mashka & R.A. Bliss, 1986. Phaseolin protein variability in wild forms and land-races of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): evidence for multiple centers of domestication. Economic Botany, 40: 451–468.Google Scholar
  12. Giraldez, R., M.C. Cermeño & J. Orellana, 1979. Comparison of C-banding pattern in the chromosomes of inbred lines and open pollinated varieties of rye. Z. Pflanzenzüchtung, 83: 40–48.Google Scholar
  13. Gray, J.R., D.E. Fairbrothers & J.A. Quinn, 1973. Biochemical and anatomical population variation in theDanthonia sericea complex. Bot. Gaz., 134: 166–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanelt, P. & D. Mettin, 1989. Biosystematics of the genusVicia L. (Leguminosae). Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 20: 199–223.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, B.L. & O. Hall, 1965. Analysis of phylogenetic affinities of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Am. J. Bot., 52: 506–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumarai, V.L. & L.L. Narayana, 1984. Chemotaxonomy ofVicieae. Acta Bot. Indica, 12: 35–40.Google Scholar
  17. Kupicha, F.K., 1976. The infrageneric structure ofVicia. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden. Edinburgh, 34: 287–326.Google Scholar
  18. Ladizinsky, G. & T. Hymowitz, 1979. Seed protein electrophoresis in taxonomic and evolutionary studies. Theor. Appl. Genet., 54: 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, J.W. & J.A. Ronald, 1967. Effect of environmental on wheat gliadin. Nature, 213: 844–846.Google Scholar
  20. Mancini, R., C. De Pace, G.T. Scarascia Mugnozza, V. Delre & D. Vittori, 1988. The use of molecular markers to study the genetical and breeding aspects ofVicia faba L. Genet. Agr., 42: 81–82.Google Scholar
  21. Maxted, N., M.A. Callimassia & M.D. Bennet, 1991. Cytotaxonomic studies of Eastern MediterraneanVicia species (Leguminosae). Plant Syst. Evol., 177: 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mettin, D. & P. Hanelt, 1967. Bemerkungen zur Karyologie und Systematik einiger Sippen der GattungVicia L. Feddes Repertorium, 77: 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Perrino, P., G. Colaprico & D. Lafiandra, 1987. Seed proteins in selected karyotypes ofVicia faba L. Genet. Agr., 41: 375–384.Google Scholar
  24. Perrino, P., G. Maruca, R.N. Lester, V. Linsalata, V. Lattanzio & P. Hanelt, 1991. Chemotaxonomic relationship among species ofVicia sectionFaba. Feddes Repertorium, 102: 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Perrino, P. & D. Pignone, 1981. Contribution to the taxonomy ofVicia species belonging to the sectionFaba. Kulturpflanze, 29: 311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perrino, P., M. Yarwood, P. Hanelt & G.B. Polignano, 1984. Variation of seed characters in selectedVicia species. Kulturpflanze, 32:103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Porceddu, E., L.M. Monti, L. Frusciante & N. Volpe, 1980. Analysis of cross pollination inVicia faba L. Z. Pflanzenzüchtung, 84: 313–322.Google Scholar
  28. Quezel, P & S. Santa, 1962. Nouvelle Flore de l'Agérie et des Régions Désertiques Méridionales. Ezitions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, Tome 1, p. 529.Google Scholar
  29. Tomooka, N., C. Lairungreang, P. Nakeeraks, Y. Egawa & C. Thavarasook, 1992. Center of genetic diversity and dissemination pathways in mung bean deduced from seed protein electrophoresis. Theor. Appl. Genet., 83: 289–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Van De Ven, W.T., N. Duncan, G. Ramsay, M. Phillips, W. Powell & R. Waugh, 1993. Taxonomic relationships betweenV. faba and its relativas based on nuclear and mitochondrial RFLPs and PCR analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet., 86: 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yamamoto, K., 1973. Karyotaxonomical studies onVicia. 1. On the karyotype and character of some annual species ofVicia. Jpn. J. Genet., 48: 315–327.Google Scholar
  32. Wolff, G., 1980. Investigations on the relations within the familyPapilionaceae on the basis of electrophoretic banding patterns. Theor. Appl. Genet., 57: 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela Rosa Piergiovanni
    • 1
  • Incoronata Galasso
    • 1
  • Pietro Perrino
    • 1
  • Domenico Pignone
    • 1
  1. 1.CNR - Istituto del GermoplasmaBariItaly

Personalised recommendations