Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the karyotypes ofPsathyrostachys juncea andP. huashanica (Poaceae) studied by banding techniques

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The karyotypes ofP. juncea (Elymus junceus) andP. huashanica (both outbreeders) were investigated by Feulgen-staining and by C-, N-, and Agbanding, based on a single plant in cach case. Both species have 2n=2x=14 and large chromosomes, possibly a generic character. The karyotype ofP. juncea has 8 metacentrics and 6 SAT-chromosomes with minute, heterochromatic satellites while that ofP. huashanica has 9 metacentrics and 5 SAT-chromosomes only, 2 of which with small, heterochromatic satellites. The C-banding patterns ofP. juncea chromosomes comprise from one to five, mostly small, bands at distal, and terminal positions, while those ofP. huashanica chromosomes are characterized by large telomeric bands in most arms. Banding patterns and chromosome morphology allow identification of the homologues of the seven chromosome pairs inP. juncea, but of two pairs inP. huashanica only. The patterns of both taxa are polymorphic, supporting that both taxa are outbreeders. The karyotypic characters suggest thatP. juncea is more closely related toP. fragilis than either is toP. huashanica. N-banding stains weakly. Silver nitrate staining demonstrates that nucleolus organizers of both species have different nucleolus forming capacities. The presence of micronucleoli suggests that both species have an extra unidentified chromosome with nucleolus forming capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anastassova-Kristeva, M., Nicoloff, H., Georgiev, S., 1978: Revision of SAT-chromosome number inTriticum monococcum with respect to nucleolar organizers activity. — Theor. Appl. Genet.53, 229–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bothmer, R. von, Jacobsen, N., Jørgensen, R. B., Linde-Laursen, I., 1984: Haploid barley from the intergeneric crossHordeum vulgare × Psathyrostachys fragilis. — Euphytica33, 363–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, D. R., 1984: The genomic system of classification as a guide to intergeneric hybridization with the perennialTriticeae. — InGustafson, J. P., (Ed.): Gene Manipulation in Plant Improvement, 209–279. — New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, 1983: A cytogenetic basis for transferring Russian wildrye fromElymus toPsathyrostachys. — Crop Sci.23, 123–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endo, T. R., Gill, B. S., 1984: The heterochromatin distribution and genome evolution in diploid species ofElymus andAgropyron. — Can. J. Genet. Cytol.26, 669–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greilhuber, J., 1984: Chromosomal Evidence in Taxonomy. — InHeywood, V. H., Moore, D. M., (Eds.): Current Concepts in Plant Taxonomy. Systematics Association Special Vol. 25, 157–180. — London and Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneen, W. K., 1963: Cytology of the intergeneric hybridElymus arenarius × Secale cereale. — Hereditas49, 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunziker, J. H., Naranjo, C. A., Zeiger, E., 1973: Las relaciones evolutivas entreHordeum compressum y otras especies diploides americanas afines. — Kurtziana7, 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linde-Laursen, I., 1984: Nucleolus organizer polymorphism in barley,Hordeum vulgare L. — Hereditas100, 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, 1984a: Identification of the somatic chromosomes ofPsathyrostachys fragilis (Poaceae). — Can. J. Genet. Cytol.26, 430–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— —— 1984b: Somatic cell cytology of the chromosome eliminating, intergeneric hybridHordeum vulgare × Psathyrostachys fragilis. — Can. J. Genet. Cytol.26, 436–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— —— 1984c: Giemsa C-banded karyotypes of two subspecies ofHordeum brevisubulatum from China. — Pl. Syst. Evol.145, 259–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— ——, 1980: Giemsa C-banding in Asiatic taxa ofHordeum sect.Stenostachys with notes on chromosome morphology. — Hereditas93, 235–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runemark, H., Heneen, W. K., 1968:Elymus andAgropyron, a problem of generic delimitation. — Bot. Not.121, 51–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto, S., 1973: Patterns of phylogenetic differentiation in the tribeTriticeae. — Seiken Zihô24, 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. J., Röbbelen, G., 1975: Comparison of somatic Giemsa banding pattern in several species of rye. — Z. Pflanzenzüchtg.74, 270–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R. R.-C., Hsiao, C., 1984: Morphology and cytology of interspecific hybrids ofLeymus mollis. — J. Heredity75, 488–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimarck, A., 1975: Heterochromatin polymorphism in the rye karyotype as detected by the Giemsa C-banding technique. — Hereditas79, 293–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Linde-Laursen, I., von Bothmer, R. Comparison of the karyotypes ofPsathyrostachys juncea andP. huashanica (Poaceae) studied by banding techniques. Pl Syst Evol 151, 203–213 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02430275

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02430275

Key Words

Navigation