Skip to main content
Log in

Beyond reductionism, with invidious comparisons between behavioral and paretian sociology

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An acceptable reductive analysis does no more nor less than find the constitutive elements of a phenomenon. It should focus on observables, including indirectly given data but not including merely convenient assumptions. It should state propositions which refer to variables which are generalizable. Using these criteria, behaviorism is found to be wanting. In contrast, Pareto's model of five significant residues provides for a constitutive analysis which uses observables and generalizable variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel, Theodore 1970 The Foundations of Sociological Theory. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Howard S. 1960 “Notes on the concept of commitment.” American Journal of Sociology 66 (July):32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann 1966 The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blain, Robert R. 1970 “On Homans' psychological reductionism.” Sociological Inquiry 41 (Winter):3–18, and “Comment on Homans' reply,” pp. 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, Herbert 1954 “What is wrong with social theory.” American Sociological Review 19 (February):3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogardus, Emory S. 1960 The Development of Social Thought, fourth edition. New York: McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushell, Jr., Don, and Robert Burgess 1969 “Some basic principles of behavior.” pp. 27–48 in Bushell and Burgess (eds.), Behavioral Sociology. The Experimental Analysis of Social Process. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, Charles Horton 1964 Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Schocken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, Lewis 1971 Masters of Sociological Thought. New York: Harcourt-Brace-Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote, Nelson 1951 “Identification as the basis for a theory of motivation.” American Sociological Review 16:14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, Robert W. 1974 “The potential impact of B. F. Skinner upon American sociology.” The American Sociologist 9 (February):3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurvitch, Georges 1962 Dialectique et Sociologie. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, George C. 1962 Sentiments and Activities. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— 1964 “Bringing men back in.” American Sociological Review 29 (December):809–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———— 1969 “The sociological relevance of behaviorism.” pp. 1–24 in Bushell and Burgess (eds.), Behavioral Sociology. The Experimental Analysis of Social Process. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— 1970 “Reply to Blain,” Sociological Inquiry 41 (Winter):19–24, and “Rebuttal to Blain,” pp. 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, H. Stuart 1961 Consciousness and Society: The Reorientation of European Social Thought 1890–1930. New York: Vintage Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvie, I. C. 1972 Concepts and Society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, Wolfgang 1947 Gestalt Psychology. New York: Mentor.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— 1971 The Selected Papers of Wolfgang Köhler, edited by Mary Henle. New York: Liveright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachenmeyer, Charles W. 1970 “Reduction in sociology: a pseudo-problem.” Pacific Sociological Review 13 (Fall):211–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louch, A. R. 1969 Explanation and Human Action. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, George H. 1936 Movements of Thought in the Nineteenth Century, edited by Merritt H. Moore. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice 1962 Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Colin Smith. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, Vilfredo 1935 The Mind and Society (Trattato di Sociologia generale), edited by Arthur Livingston, translated by Andrew Bongiorno and Livingston. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 4 vols.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. 1945 “The operational analysis of psychological terms.” Psychological Review 52 (September):5:270–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— 1972 Beyond Freedom and Dignity. New York: Bantam Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I. 1928 The Unadjusted Girl. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Jonathan H. 1974 The Structure of Sociological Theory. Homewood, Illinois: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Helmut R. 1964 “The displacement of scope: a problem of the relationship between small-scale and large-scale sociological theories.” American Journal of Sociology 69 (May):6:571–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, Jr., Murray 1973 “Psychological reductionism, methodological individualism, and large-scale problems.” American Sociological Review 38 (April):258–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winch, Peter 1958 The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, Robert F. 1971 The Modern Family, third edition. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zetterberg, Hans L. 1965 On Theory and Verification in Sociology, third enlarged edition. Totowa, New Jersey: Bedminster.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Revised version of a paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association in New York, August 1976.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blasi, A.J. Beyond reductionism, with invidious comparisons between behavioral and paretian sociology. Qual Sociol 1, 1–20 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02429884

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02429884

Keywords

Navigation