Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender-informed archaeology: The priority of definition, the use of analogy, and the multivariate approach

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite recent efforts to construct gender theory in archaeology, I assert that no methodological or theoretical breakthroughs have occurred. This lack of progress is due to several factors. First, fundamental terms such as “theory,” “gender,” and “sex” have been used inconsistently; I suggest some working definitions for these terms. Second, researchers have resorted to the use of analogical arguments that implicitly deny the role of gender in the organization of human relations. Third, feminist political agendas have been conflated with research questions. In order to address some of these issues, I suggest that the application of a multivariate approach to the study of gender can avoid the problems inherent in any one line of evidence. Finally, I argue that a consideration of the scale of gender questions is essential to the application of existing theoretical frameworks to gender archaeologically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References Cited

  • Ascher, R. (1961). Analogy in archaeological interpretation.Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 17: 317–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1967). Smudge pits and hide smoking: The use of analogy in archaeological reasoning.American Antiquity 32(1): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1968). Archeological perspectives. In Binford, S. R. and Binford, L. R. (eds.),New Perspectives in Archeology, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1971). Mortuary practices: Their study and their potential. In Brown, J. A. (ed.),Approaches to the Social Dimensions of Mortuary Practices. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, No. 25, pp. 6–29.

  • Blackwood, E. (1984). Sexuality and gender in certain Native American tribes: The case of cross-gender females.SIGNS 10(1): 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolen, K. M. (1992). Prehistoric construction of mothering. In Claassen, C. (ed.),Exploring Gender Through Archaeology, Prehistory Press, Madison, pp. 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977).Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. C. (1996). Skeletal correlates of human behavior in the Americas.Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 3(3): 189–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, P. S. (1989). Changes in activities with the shift to agriculture in the southeastern United States.Current Anthropology 30(3): 385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumbach, H. J., and Jarvenpa, R. (1997). Ethnoarchaeology of subsistence space and gender: A subarctic Dene case.American Antiquity 62(3): 414–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumfiel, E. M. (1991). Weaving and cooking: Women's production in Aztec Mexico In Gero, J. M., and Conkey, M. (eds.),Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 224–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumfiel, E. M. (1992). Distinguished Lecture in Archeology: Breaking and entering the ecosystem — Gender, class, and faction steal the show.American Anthropologist 94(3): 551–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumfiel, E. M. (1994). Ethnic groups and political development in ancient Mexico. In Brumfiel, E. M., and Fox, J. W. (eds.),Factional Competition and Political Development in the New World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumsted, M. P., Booker, J. E., Barnes, R. M., Boutton, T. W., Armelagos, G. J., Lerman, J. C., and Brendel, K. (1990). Recognizing women in the archeological record. In Nelson, S. M., and Kehoe, A. B. (eds.),Powers of Observation: Alternative Views in Archeology. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association No. 2, pp. 89–101.

  • Butler, J. (1990).Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1993).Bodies That Matter, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callender, C., and Kochems, L. M. (1983). The North American berdache.Current Anthropology 24(4): 443–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calnek, E. E. (1974). The Sahagún texts as a source of sociological information. In Edmonson, M. S. (ed.),Sixteenth Century Mexico: The Work of Sahagún, University of New Mexico Press and SAR, Albuquerque, pp. 189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, T. H. (1981). Archaeology, ethnohistory, and ethnology: Interpretive interfaces. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.),Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 4, Academic Press, New York, pp. 129–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claassen, C. (1992). Questioning gender: An introduction. In Claassen, C. (ed.),Exploring Gender Through Archaeology, Prehistory Press, Madison, pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. N., and Bennett, S. (1993). Skeletal evidence for sex roles and gender hierarchies in prehistory. In Miller B. D. (ed.),Sex and Gender Hierarchies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 273–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M., and Gero, J. M. (1991). Tensions, pluralities, and engendering archaeology: An introduction to women and prehistory. In Gero, J. M., and Conkey, M. (eds.),Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Basil Blackwell Ltd, Oxford, pp. 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M., and Spector, J. (1984). Archaeology and the study of gender. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.),Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 7, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M., and Tringham, R. (1995). Archaeology and the goddess: Exploring the contours of feminist archaeology. In Stanton, D. C., and Stewart, A. J. (eds.),Feminisms in the Academy, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp. 199–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M. with Williams, S. H. (1991). Original narratives: The political economy of gender in archaeology. In di Leonardo, M. (ed.),Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 102–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, C. L. (1996). Exploring the relationship between gender and craft in complex societies: Methodological and theoretical issues of gender attribution. In Wright, R. P. (ed.),Gender and Archaeology, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 111–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Deagan, K. A. (1985). Spanish-Indian interaction in sixteenth-century Florida and Hispaniola. In Fitzhugh, W. W. (ed.),Cultures in Contact, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 281–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobres, M.-A. (1988). Feminist archaeology and inquiries into gender relations.Archaeological Review from Cambridge 7(1): 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Olwer, L. N. (1952).Fray Bernardino de Sahagún (1499–1590), Instituto Panamericano de Geographía e Historia, Mexico City. [English translation by Mixco, M. J. (1987). University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Donley-Reid, L. W. (1990). A structuring structure: The Swahili house. InDomestic Architecture and the Use of Space, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 114–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. C. (1978). Archaeological potential of anthropological and scientific models of function. In Dunnell, R. C., and Hall, E. S. (ed.),Archaeological Essays in Honor of Irving B. Rouse, Mouton, The Hague, pp. 41–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. C. (1992). Archaeology and evolutionary theory. In Wandsnider, L. (ed.),Quandaries and Quests, Occasional Paper No. 20, Center for Archaeological Investigation, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 209–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, R. (1987).The Chalice & the Blade: Our History, Our Future, Harper Collins, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, R. (1989). Reclaiming our goddess heritage. In Nicholson, S. (comp.),The Goddess Re-Awakening, Quest Books, Wheaton, IL, pp. 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelstad, E. (1991). Images of power and contradiction: Feminist theory and post-processual archaeology,Antiquity 65: 502–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, B. (1992). A sexist view of prehistory.Archaeology 45(2): 14–18, 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedigan, L. M. (1986). The changing role of women in models of human evolution.Annual Review of Anthropology 15: 25–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotiadis, M. (1994). What is archaeology's “mitigated objectivism” mitigated by? Comments on Wylie.American Antiquity 59(3): 545–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fratt, L. (1991). A preliminary analysis of gender bias in the sixteenth and seventeenth century Spanish colonial documents of the American Southwest. In Walde, D., and Willows, N. D. (eds.),The Archaeology of Gender, University of Calgary Archaeological Association, Calgary, pp. 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero, J. (1991). Genderlithics: Women's roles in stone tool production. In Gero, J. M., and Conkey, M. (eds.),Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 163–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. (1964).The Aztecs Under Spanish Rule: A History of the Indians of the Valley of Mexico 1519–1810, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist, R. (1991). Women's archaeology? Political feminism, gender theory and historical revision.Antiquity 65: 495–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist, R. (1994).Gender and Material Culture: The Archaeology of Religious Women, routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimbutas, M. (1982).The Goddesses and Gods of Old Europe 6500–3500 BC: Myths and Cult Images, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimbutas, M. (1989).The Language of the Goddess. Harper & Row, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimbutas, M. (1991).The Civilization of the Goddess, Harper Collins, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosden, C. (1994).Social Being and Time, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R. A. (1978). Beyond analogy in ethnoarchaeology. In Gould, R. A. (ed.),Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 249–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R. A., and Watson, P. J. (1982). A dialogue on the meaning and use of analogy in ethnoarchaeological reasoning.Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1(4): 355–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guenther, T. R. (1991). The Horse Creek site: Some evidence for gender roles.Plains Anthropologist 36(134): 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handsman, R. G. (1991). Whose art was found at Lepenski Vir? Gender relations and power in archaeology. In Gero, J. M., and Conkey, M. (eds.),Engendering Archaeology: Wormen and Prehistory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 329–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassig, R. (1994).Mexico and the Spanish Conquest, Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastorf, C. A. (1991). Gender, space, and food in prehistory. In Gero, J. M., and Conkey, M. (eds.),Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 132–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, B. (1992). Observing prehistoric women. In Claassen, C. (ed.),Exploring Gender Through Archaeology, Prehistory Press, Madison, pp. 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays-Gilpin, K. (1997). Gender ideology and ritual in Southwestern prehistory. Paper presented at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Nashville, TN.

  • Hegmon, M., and Trevathan, W. R. (1996). Gender, anatomical knowledge, and pottery production: Implications of an anatomically unusual birth depicted on Mimbres pottery from southwestern New Mexico.American Antiquity 61(4): 747–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herdt, G. (ed.) (1994).Third Sex, Third Gender: Beyond Sexual Dimorphism in Culture and History, Zone Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. N. (1970). Prehistoric social organization in the American Southwest: Theory and method. In Longacre, W. A. (ed),Reconstructing Prehistoric Pueble Societies, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 11–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocquenghem, A. M., and Lyon, P. J. (1980). A class of anthropomorphic supernatural females in Moche iconography.Nawpa Pacha 18: 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1982).Symbols in Action: Ethnoarchaeological Studies of Material Culture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1984). Burials, houses, women and men in the European Neolithic. In Miller, D., and Tilley, C. (eds.),Ideology, Power and Prehistory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1985). Postprocessual archaeology. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.),Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 8, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1986),Reading the Past, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1990).The Domestication of Europe, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1991). Gender representation and social reality. In Walde, D., and Willows, N. D. (eds.),The Archaeology of Gender, University of Calgary Archaeological Association, Calgary, pp 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollimon, S. E. (1992). Health consequences of sexual division of labor among Native Americans. In Claassen, C. (ed.),Exploring Gender Through Archaeology, Prehistory Press, Madison, pp. 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollimon, S. E. (1997). The third gender in Native California Two-spirit undertakers among the Chumash and their neighbors. In Claassen, C., and Joyce, R. A. (eds.),Women in Prehistory: North America and Mesoamerica, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. S. (1991). Division of labor at a Besant hunting camp in eastern Montana.Plains Anthropologist 36(134): 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurcombe, L. (1995). Our own engendered species.Antiquity 69(262): 87–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, R. A., and Claassen, C. (1997). Women in the ancient Americas: Archaeologists, gender, and the making of prehistory. In Claasen, C., and Joyce, R. A. (eds.),Women in Prehistory: North America and Mesoamerica, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keber, E. (1988). Reading images: The making and meaning of the Sahaguntine illustrations. In Klor de Alva, J. J., et al., (eds.),The Work of Bernardino de Sahagún, Studies on Culture and Society, Vol. 2, Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, Albany, NY, pp. 199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, S. (1995). The woman's room: Some aspects of gender relations in Tenochtitlan.Ethnohistory 42(4): 563–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klor de Alva, J. J. (1982). Spiritual conflict and accommodation in New Spain: Toward a typology of Aztec responses to Christianity. In Collier, G. A., et al. (eds.),The Inca and Aztec States 1400–1800: Anthropology and History, Academic Press, New York, pp. 345–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klor de Alva, J. J. (1988a). Sahagún and the birth of modern ethnography: Representing, confessing, and inscribing the native other. In Klor de Alva J. J., et al. (eds.),The Work of Bernardino de Sahagún, Studies on Culture and Society, Vol. 2., Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, Albany, NY, pp. 31–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klor de Alva, J. J. (1988b). Sahagún's misguided introduction to ethnography and the failure of theColloquios project. In Klor de Alva, J. J., et al. (eds.),The Work of Bernardino de Sahagún, Studies on Culture and Society, Vol. 2. Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, Albany, NY, pp. 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klor de Alva, J. J., Nicholson, H. B., and Keber, E. (1988). Introduction. In Klor de Alva, J. J., et al. (eds.),The Work of Bernardino de Sahagún, Studies on Culture and Society, Vol. 2, Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, Albany, NY, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamphere, L. (1987). Feminism and anthropology: The struggle to reshape our thinking about gender. In Farnham, C. (ed.),The Impact of Feminist Research in the Academy, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M., Potter, P., and Shackel, P. (1987). Toward a critical archaeology,Current Anthropology 28(3): 283–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, G. (1986).The Creation of Patriarchy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liss, P. K. (1975).Mexico Under Spain 1521–1556: Society and the Origins of Nationality, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, B. J. (1994). Consider the hermaphroditic mind: Comment on “The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests: Recent Archaeological Research on Gender”.American Antiquity 59(3): 539–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart, J. (1992).The Nahuas After the Conquest, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart, J. (1993).We People Here: Nahuatl Accounts of the Conquest of Mexico Vol. 1, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, M. (1995). Beyond the “big three”: The development of feminist theory into the 1990s.Women's History Review 4(3): 259–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCafferty, S., and McCafferty, G. (1994). Engendering tomb 7 at Monte Albán.Current Anthropology 35(2): 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoid, C. H., and McDermott, L. D. (1996). Toward decolonizing gender: Female vision in the Upper Paleolithic.American Anthropologist 98(2): 319–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, L. (1996). Seof-representation in Upper Paleolithic female figurines.Current Anthropology 37(2): 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, P. (1995). On cultural authority: Women's studies, feminist politics, and the popular press.SIGNS: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 20(3): 668–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, B. G. (1991). The Archaeology of Women in the Spanish New World.Historical Archaeology 25(4): 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meigs, A. (1990). Multiple gender ideologies and statuses. In Sanday, P. R., and Goodenough, R. G. (eds.),Beyond the Second Sex, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. (1995). Goddesses, Gimbutas and “New Age” archaeology.Antiquity 69(262): 74–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. (1996). The somatization of archaeology: Institutions, discourses, corporeality.Norwegian Archaeological Review 29(1): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. (1997).Egyptian Social Dynamics: The Evidence of Age, Sex, and Class from Domestic and Mortuary Contexts, Dissertation, Department of Archaeology, Cambridge University, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mobley-Tanaka, J. L. (1997). Gender and ritual space during the pithouse to pueblo transition: Subterranean mealing rooms in the North American Southwest.American Antiquity 62(3): 437–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molleson, T. (1994). The eloquent bones of Abu Hureyra.Scientific American 271(2): 70–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, H. (1988).Feminism and Anthropology. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, H. (1993). The differences within and the differences between. In del Valle, T. (ed.),Gendered Anthropology, Routledge, London, pp. 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, H. (1994).A Passion for Difference, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, S. M. (1990). Diversity of the Upper Paleolithic “Venus” figurines and archeological mythology, In Nelson, S. M., and Kehoe, A. B. (eds.),Powers of Observation: Alternative Views in Archeology, Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Assocation No. 2, pp. 11–22.

  • Nicholson, L. (1994). Interpreting gender.SIGNS: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 20(1): 79–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, M., and Holland, T. (1995). Behavioral archaeology and the extended phenotype. In Skibo, J. M., et al. (eds.),Expanding Archaeology, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 143–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, P. J. (1990). Evidence for the antiquity of gender roles in the Central Plains tradition, In Nelson, S. M., and Kehoe, A. B. (eds.),Powers of Observation: Alternative Views in Archeology, Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association No. 2, pp. 61–72.

  • Peterson, J. F. (1988). TheFlorentine Codex imagery and the colonialTlacuilo. In Klor de Alva, J. J., et al. (eds.),The Work of Bernardino de Sahagún, Studies on Culture and Society, Vol. 2, Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, Albany, pp. 273–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, S. (1991). Women in a men's world: Images of Sumerian women, In Gero, J. M., and Conkey, M. (eds.),Engendering Archaeology, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 366–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R. (1978). Women, religion and archaic civilizations: An introduction.Feminist Studies 4(3): 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reff, D. T. (1992). Contact shock in northwestern New Spain, 1518–1764. In Verano, J. W., and Ubelaker, D. H. (eds.),Disease and Demography in the Americas, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp. 265–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, R. R. (1975). Men and Women in the South of France: Public and Private Domains, In Reiter, R. (ed.),Toward and Anthropology of Women, Monthly Review Press, New York, pp. 252–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. (1974). The treatment of architecture in theFlorentine Codex of Sahagún, In Edmonson, M. S. (ed.),Sixteenth Century Mexico: The Work of Sahagún, University of New Mexico Press and SAR, Albuquerque, pp. 151–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo, M. Z. (1980). The use and abuse of anthropology: Reflections on feminism and cross-cultural understanding.SIGNS: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 5(3): 389–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, G. (1975). The traffic in women: Notes on the “political economy” of sex, In Reiter, R. (ed),Toward an Anthropology of Women, Monthly Review Press, New York, pp. 157–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahagún, B. de (1950–1982) [1569].The Florentine Codex: General History of the Things of New Spain (Historia General de las Cosas de Nueva España), 13 Vol. In Dibble, E., and Anderson, A. J. (eds.), School of American Research, Santa Fe, and University of Utah, Salt Lake City (in English and Nahuatl).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, M. H. (1982).Philosophy and Archaeology, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Albornoz, N. (1984). The population of colonial Spanish America. In Bethell, L. (ed),The Cambridge History of Latin America, Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. W. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis.American Historical Review 91(5): 1053–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, D. J. (1991). Introduction.Historical Archaeology 25(4): 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, B. S., Gardner, K. M., and Shafer, H. J. (1997). An unusual birth depicted in Mimbres pottery.American Antiquity 62(4) 727–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, M., and Tilley, C. (1987).Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverblatt, I. (1978). Andean women in the Inca Empire.Feminist Studies 4(3): 37–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverblatt, I. (1987).Moon, Sun, and Witches, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverblatt, I. (1991). Interpreting women in states: New feminist ethnohistories. In di Leonardo, M. (ed.),Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 140–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverblatt, I. (1995). Lessons of Gender and Ethnohistory in Mesoamerica,Ethnohistory 42(4): 639–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, A. W., and Ravesloot, J. C. (1995). Salado ceramic burial offerings: A consideration of gender and social organization.Journal of Anthropological Research 51(2): 103–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skibo, J. M., and Schiffer, M. B. (1995). The clay cooking pot: An exploration of women's technology. In Skibo, J. M., et al. (eds.),Expanding Archaeology, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 80–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, D. B. (1991). Initial study of the structure of women's seclusion in the archaeological past. In Walde, D., and Willows, N. D. (eds.),The Archaeology of Gender, University of Calgary Archaeological Association, Calgary, pp. 336–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, M. L. S. (1992). Gender archaeology and Scandinavian Bronze Age studies.Norwegian Archaeological Review 25(1): 31–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spain, D. (1992).Gendered Spaces, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. (1983). Male/female task differentiation among the Hidatsa. In Albers, P., and Medicine, B. (eds.),The Hidden Half, University Press of America, New York, pp. 77–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. (1991). What this awl means: Toward a feminist archaeology. In Gero, J. M., and Conkey, M. W. (eds.),Engendering Archaeology, Blackwells, Oxford, pp. 388–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1991). Toward a feminist historical archaeology of the construction of gender. In Walde, D., and Willow, N. D. (eds.),The Archaeology of Gender, University of Calgary Archaeological Association, Calgary, pp. 234–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielmann, K. A. (1995). Glimpses of gender in the prehistoric Southwest.Journal of Anthropological Research 51(2): 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, D. C., and Stewart, A. J. (1995). Remodeling relations: Women's studies and the disciplines. In Stanton, D. C., and Stewart, a. J. (eds.),Feminisms in the Academy, Univesity of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talalay, L. E. (1994). A feminist boomerang: The great goddess of Greek prehistory.Gender & History 6(2): 165–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talalay, L. E. (1997). Women, gender, and Aegean prehistory: A view from the front line. Paper presented at the Fourth Gender and Archaeology Conference, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

  • Tilley, C. (1993). Introduction, In Tilley, C. (ed.),Interpretative Archaeology, Providence, RI, Berg, pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. (1982). Ethnohistory: Problems and prospects.Ethnohistory 29(1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. A. (1991). What the New Archaeology has accomplished.Current Anthropology 32(3): 275–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J. M., and Frankel, D. (1995). Gender inequity and archaeological practice: A Cypriot case study,Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 8(2): 93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, M. K. (1991a). Gender and historical archaeology: Eastern Dakota patterns in the 19th century,Historical Archaeology 25(4): 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, M. K. (1991b). Gender and archaeology: Mortuary studies and the search for the origins of gender differentiation, In Walde, D., and Willows, N. D. (eds.),The Archaeology of Gender, University of Calgary Archaeological Association, Calgary, pp. 358–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. M., and Rogers, J. D. (1993). Historical dynamics in the Contact era. In Rogers, J. D., and Wilson, S. M. (eds.),Ethnohistory and Archaeology: Approaches to Postcontact Change in the Americas, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wobst, H. M. (1978). The archaeo-ethnology of hunter-gatherers or the tyranny of the ethnographic record in archaeology.American Antiquity 43(2): 303–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. P. (1996). Technology, gender, and class: Worlds of difference in Ur III Mesopotamia. In Wright, R. P. (ed.),Gender and Archaeology, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 79–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (1982). An analogy by any other name is just as analogical.Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1(4): 382–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (1985). The reaction against analogy. In Schiffer, M. B. (eds.),Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 8, Academic Press, New York, pp. 63–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (1989). Archaeological cables and tacking.Philosophy of Social Science 19: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (1991). Gender theory and the archaeological record: Why is there no archaeology of gender? In Gero, J. M., and Conkey, M. (eds.),Engendering Archaeology, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 31–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (1992a). Feminist theories of social power: Some implications for a processual archaeology.Norwegian Archaeological Review 25(1): 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (1992b). The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: Recent archaeological research on gender.American Antiquity 57(1): 15–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (1993). Invented lands/discovered pasts: The westward expansion of myth and history.Historical Archaeology 27(4): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, T. (1993). Frameworks for an archaeology of the body. In Tilley, C. (ed.),Interpretative Archaeology, Berg, Oxford, pp. 31–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, 87131, Albuquerque, New Mexico

    Erica Hill

Authors
  1. Erica Hill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, E. Gender-informed archaeology: The priority of definition, the use of analogy, and the multivariate approach. J Archaeol Method Theory 5, 99–128 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428417

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428417

Key Words

Search

Navigation