Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 289–294 | Cite as

Crushability maps for structural polymeric foams in uniaxial loading under rigid confinement

  • G. Subhash
  • Q. Liu


A family of epoxy-based polymeric foams with various initial porosity levels was subjected to quasi-static uniaxial loading in rigid confinement (uniaxial strain) to investigate their crushability characteristics. Two issues were investigated. The first issue was the uniformity of deformation in a specimen as a function of porosity level by creating a grid of equally spaced thin stripes on the surface and by monitoring their pattern during the experiment. It was found that the higher the porosity of foam, the more non-uniform the deformation in the specimen. However, the localized non-uniform deformation did not affect the global stress-strain response, especially at large deformations. The second issue was the development of a new analysis tool, called “crushability map”. The purpose of the tool is to depict the evolution of porosity, bulk density and energy absorption as functions of applied strain, stress, and porosity. These maps can assist in characterizing the residual crushability or energy absorption capability of foams as a function of residual porosity. The maps can be used as a design tool for selection of suitable foams for a given application in conjunction with various design criteria.

Key words

Structural foam crushability map multiaxial compression uniaxial strain rigid confinement 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Monk, M.W. and Sullivan, L.K., “Energy Absorption Material Selection Methodology for Head/a-pillar,” SAE Paper No. 861887 (1986).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bilkhu, S.S., Founnas, M., and Nusholtz, G.S., “Material Modeling of structure Foams in Finite Element Analysis Using Compressive Uniaxial and Triaxial Data,” SAE Paper No. 930434 (1993).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chou, C.C., Zhao, Y., Chai, L., Co, J., and Lim, G.G., “Development of Foam Models as Applications to Vehicle Interior,” SEA Paper No. 952733 (1995).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chou, C.C., Zhao, Y., Lim, G.G., and Song, G.S., “A Constitutive Model for Polyurethane Foams with Strain-Rate and Temperature Effects,” SEA Paper No. 980967 (1998).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Faruque, O., Liu, N., and Chou, C.C., “Strain Rate Dependent Foam-Constitutive Modeling and Applications,” SAE Paper No. 971076 (1997).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gibson, L.J. andAshby, M.F., Cellular Solids, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deshpanae, V.S. andFleck, N.A., “Multi-Axial Yield Behavior of Polymer Foams,” Acta Mater.,49, 1859–1866 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu, Q. and Subhash, G., “A Phenomenological Constitutive Model For Foams Under Large Deformations,” Poly. Eng. Sci., at press (2003).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McFarland, R.K., “Hexagonal Cell Structures under Post-Buckling Axial Load,”AIAA J.,1 (6),1380–1385 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu, E. andJiang, W.-S., “Axial Crush of Metallic Honeycombs,”Int. J. Impact. Eng.,19, (5–6),439–456 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salvini, P., Vullo, V., and Gaetani, L., “Axial Plastic Collapse of Aluminum Honeycomb,” SAE Paper No. 971745 (1997).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Subhash
    • 1
  • Q. Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering-Engineering MechanicsMichigan Technological UniversityHoughtonUSA

Personalised recommendations