Summary
10 patients with symptoms of mandibular neuralgia formed the basis of this study. They were studied by both enhanced CT and MRI. MRI, better than CT, easily permits distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic lesions and detects involvement of the cavernous sinus and meninges. Morever, because of its multiplanar imaging capability, and ability to portray exquisite anatomic details and characteristic tissue signal intensity, MRI is helpful in the evaluation of tumor involvement for biopsy and preoperative planning for these deep tumours.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hardin CW Hamsberger R (1987) The radiographic evaluation of trigeminal neuropathy-seminars in ultrasound, CT and MR. 8: 214–239
Daniels D, Pech P, Pojunas K, Kilgore D, Williams A, Haughton V (1986) Trigeminal nerve anatomic correlation with MR imaging. Radiology 159: 572–583
Tash R, Sze G, Leslie D (1989) Trigeminal neuralgia: MR imaging features. Radiology 172: 767–770
Lye R, Ramsden R, Stack J, Gillespie J (1987) Trigeminal nerve tumor: comparison of CT and MRI. J Neurosurg 67: 124
Yuy W, Wright D, Barloon T, Schultz D, Sato Y, Cervantes C (1988) MR imaging of primary tumors of trigeminal nerve and meckel's cave. AJNR 15: 577–582
Pollack I, Sekhar L, Lannetta P, Janecka I (1989) Neurilemmomas of the trigeminal nerve. J Neurosurg 70: 737–745
De Pena C, Lee Y, Van Tassel P (1989) Lymphomatous involvement of the trigeminal nerve and meckel cave CT and MR appearance. AJNR 10: 15–17
Curtin H, Williams R, Johnson J (1985) CT of perineural tumor extension: pterygo-palatine fossa. AJR 144: 163–166
Atri M, Robertson W, Durity F, Dolman C (1987) Actinomycotic granuloma of the trigeminal ganglion. AJNR 8: 167–169
Noyek A, Kassel E, Wortzman G, Jazrawy H, Holgate R (1982) CT in occult disease involving foramen ovale. Laryngoscope 92: 1021–1027
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marsot-Dupuch, K., Matozza, F., Firat, M.M. et al. Mandibular nerve: MR versus CT about 10 proved unusual tumors. Neuroradiology 32, 492–496 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426462
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426462