Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mandibular nerve: MR versus CT about 10 proved unusual tumors

  • Head and neck radiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

10 patients with symptoms of mandibular neuralgia formed the basis of this study. They were studied by both enhanced CT and MRI. MRI, better than CT, easily permits distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic lesions and detects involvement of the cavernous sinus and meninges. Morever, because of its multiplanar imaging capability, and ability to portray exquisite anatomic details and characteristic tissue signal intensity, MRI is helpful in the evaluation of tumor involvement for biopsy and preoperative planning for these deep tumours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hardin CW Hamsberger R (1987) The radiographic evaluation of trigeminal neuropathy-seminars in ultrasound, CT and MR. 8: 214–239

    Google Scholar 

  2. Daniels D, Pech P, Pojunas K, Kilgore D, Williams A, Haughton V (1986) Trigeminal nerve anatomic correlation with MR imaging. Radiology 159: 572–583

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tash R, Sze G, Leslie D (1989) Trigeminal neuralgia: MR imaging features. Radiology 172: 767–770

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lye R, Ramsden R, Stack J, Gillespie J (1987) Trigeminal nerve tumor: comparison of CT and MRI. J Neurosurg 67: 124

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yuy W, Wright D, Barloon T, Schultz D, Sato Y, Cervantes C (1988) MR imaging of primary tumors of trigeminal nerve and meckel's cave. AJNR 15: 577–582

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pollack I, Sekhar L, Lannetta P, Janecka I (1989) Neurilemmomas of the trigeminal nerve. J Neurosurg 70: 737–745

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. De Pena C, Lee Y, Van Tassel P (1989) Lymphomatous involvement of the trigeminal nerve and meckel cave CT and MR appearance. AJNR 10: 15–17

    Google Scholar 

  8. Curtin H, Williams R, Johnson J (1985) CT of perineural tumor extension: pterygo-palatine fossa. AJR 144: 163–166

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Atri M, Robertson W, Durity F, Dolman C (1987) Actinomycotic granuloma of the trigeminal ganglion. AJNR 8: 167–169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Noyek A, Kassel E, Wortzman G, Jazrawy H, Holgate R (1982) CT in occult disease involving foramen ovale. Laryngoscope 92: 1021–1027

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marsot-Dupuch, K., Matozza, F., Firat, M.M. et al. Mandibular nerve: MR versus CT about 10 proved unusual tumors. Neuroradiology 32, 492–496 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426462

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426462

Key words

Navigation