Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multiple slice FLASH imaging: An improved pulse sequence for contrast enhanced MR brain studies

  • Originals
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A multisclice gradient echo sequence (FLASH) was compared with a conventional spin-echo (SE) technique with regard to its value for contrast enhanced brain studies. In 50 patients with contrast enhancing intracranial lesions, MR studies (0.5 Tesla MR tomograph) were performed with SE images (SE 400/30; four images/3.4 min) and FLASH scans (FLASH 315/14, 90°; 15 images/1.4 min) before and after Gd-DTPA. Based on visual and quantitative assessment diagnostic results of postcontrast SE- and FLASH images were equivalent with respect to contrast enhancement, lesion/brain-contrast, lesion/edema-contrast, and lesion delineation. Although image quality generally was excellent on postcontrast FLASH images, susceptibility artifacts were more severe on FLASH scans than on SE images. However, with the exception of postoperative patients with artifacts due to metal remains, diagnostic information was not decreased by artifacts on postcontrast FLASH images. In conclusion, because of the clearly higher efficiency of the multisclice FLASH technique, this pulse sequence offers the opportunity to speed up contrast enhanced brain imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brant-Zawadzki M, Berry I, Osaki L, Brasch R, Murovic J, Norman D (1986) Gd-DTPA in clinical MR of the brain: 1. Intraaxial lesions. AJNR 7: 781–788

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carr DH, Brown J, Bydder GM, Weinmann HJ, Speck U, Thomas DJ, Young UR (1984) Intravenous chelated gadolinium as a contrast agent in NMR imaging of cerebral tumors. Lancet 1: 484–486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Felix R, Schörner W, Laniado M, Niendorf HP, Claussen C, Fiegler W, Speck U (1985) Brain tumors: MR imaging with gadolinium-DTPA. Radiology 156: 681–688

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schörner W, Laniado M, Kornmesser W, Felix R (1989) Comparison of multi-echo and contrast enhanced MR scans: image contrast and delineation of intracranial tumors. Neuroradiology 31: 140–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Laniado M, Niendorf HP, Sehömer W, Felix R (1986) Spin-echo and inversion-recovery sequences for gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced MRI of intracranial tumors. Acta Radiol [Suppl] 369: 469–471

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Price AC, Runge VM (1986) Optimization of pulse sequence in Gd-DTPA enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. In: Runge VM, Claussen C, Felix R, James AE (eds) Contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging. Excerpta Medica, Princeton, pp 99–102

    Google Scholar 

  7. Utz JA, Herfkens RJ, Johnson CD, et al. (1987) Two-second MR images: comparison with spin echo images in 29 patients. AJR 148: 629–633

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Haase A, Frahm J, Mathaei D, Hänicke W, Merboldt KD (1986) FLASH imaging. Rapid NMR imaging using low flip-angle pulses. J Magn Reson 67: 217–225

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van der Meulen P, Groen JP, Cuppen JJ (1985) Very fast MR imaging by field ethos and small angle excitation. Magn Reson Imag 3: 297–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mills TC, Ortendahl DA, Hylton NM, Crooks LE, Carlson JW, Kaufman L (1987) Partial flip angle MR imaging. Radiology 162: 531–539

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stadnik TW, Luypaert RR, Neirynck EC, Osteaux M (1988) Optimization of sequence parameters in fast MR imaging of the brain with FLASH. AJNR 10: 357–362

    Google Scholar 

  12. Winkler ML, Ortendahl DA, Mills TC, Crooks LE, Sheldon PE, Kaufman L (1988) Characteristics of partial flip angle and gradient reversal MR imaging. Radiology 166: 17–26

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koschorek FG, Jensen HP, Terwey B (1986) Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of brain lesions: preliminary results: In: Runge VM, Claussen C, Felix R, James AE (eds) Contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging. Excerpta Medica, Princeton; pp 129–131

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sander B, Kornmesser W, Felix R (1987) Improved clinical application of FLASH imaging using multi slice technique. Presented at the Topical Conference on Fast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques, 15–17.5.1987, Cleveland

  15. Hart HR, Bottomley PA, Edelstein WA, Karr SG, Leue WM, Mueller O, Redington RW, Schenck JF, Smith LS, Vatis D (1983) Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging: contrast-to-noise ratio as a function of strength of magnetic field. AJR 141: 1195–1201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Runge VM (1988) Clinical applications of 3-D fast imaging. Sixth annual meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Boston

  17. Hinshaw DB, Holshouser BA, Engstrom HIM, Tjan AHL, Christiansen EL, Catelli WF (1988) Dental material artifacts on MR images. Radiology 166: 777–779

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schörner, W., Sander, B., Henkes, H. et al. Multiple slice FLASH imaging: An improved pulse sequence for contrast enhanced MR brain studies. Neuroradiology 32, 474–480 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426458

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426458

Key words

Navigation