Sociological Forum

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 631–637 | Cite as

Progress in sociology: A reply to Cole's reply

  • Walter L. Wallace
Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

A reply to the former editor argues the priority of standardized empirical definitions in scientific studies of causation, proposes a small set of definitions to be standardized in sociology, and cites exemplars of such standardization in other fields.

Key words

standardization substantive definitions sociology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blau, Peter M. 1975 “Parameters of social structure.” In Peter M. Blau (ed.), Approaches to the Study of Social Structure: 220–253. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blalock, Hubert M. 1979 “Dilemmas and strategies of theory construction.” In William E. Snizek, Ellsworth Fuhrman, and Michael K. Miller (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Theory and Research: 119–135. Westport, CN: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, Donald T. 1986 “Science's social system of validity-enhancing collective belief change and the problems of the social sciences.” In Donald W. Fiske and Richard A. Schweder (eds.), Metatheory in Social Science: 108–135. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cole, Stephen 1992 Making Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Corliss, John O. 1982 “The history and role of nomenclature in the taxonomy and classification of organisms.” In Sybil P. Parker (ed.), Synopsis and Classification of Living organisms, Vol. 2: 1065–1066. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  6. Durkheim, Emile 1982 The Rules of Sociological Method. (1895) New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gibbs, Jack P. 1968 “The study of norms.” In David L. Sills (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 11: 208–212. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Hempel, Carl G. 1952 Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kroeber, A. L. and Talcott Parsons 1958 “The concepts of culture and of social system.” American Sociological Review 23:582–583.Google Scholar
  10. Kula, Witold 1986 Measures and Men. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Latour, Bruno and Steve Woolgar 1979 Laboratory Life. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Maines, David R. 1990 “Pursuing the simplifications in Smelser's vision.” The American Sociologist, Fall: 294–297.Google Scholar
  13. Schneider, Louis 1973 “The idea of culture in the social sciences: critical and supplementary observations.” In Louis Schneider and Charles M. Bonjean (eds.), The Idea of Culture in the Social Sciences: 118–143. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Smelser, Neil J. 1988 “Social structure.” In Neil J. Smelser (ed.), The Handbook of Sociology: 103–130. Newbury Park CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Stevens, S. S. 1946 “On the theory of scales of measurement.” Science 103:677–680.Google Scholar
  16. Turner, Jonathan H. 1986 The Structure of Sociological Theory. Chicago: Dorsey.Google Scholar
  17. Warriner, Charles K. 1981 “Levels in the study of social structure.” In Peter M. Blau and Robert K. Merton (eds.), Continuities in Structural Inquiry: 179–190. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Warwick, Andrew 1995 “The laboratory of theory or what's exact about the exact sciences?” in M. Norton Wise (ed.), The Values of Precision: 311–351. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Wuthnow, Robert, James Davison Hunter, Albert Bergesen, and Edith Kurzweil 1984 “Introduction.” In Robert Wuthnowet al. (eds.), Cultural Analysis: 1–20. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter L. Wallace
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyPrinceton UniversityPrinceton

Personalised recommendations