Minor anomalies: Diagnostic clues to aberrant human morphogenesis
- 90 Downloads
Assessment of the degree of fluctuating asymmetry has been used in a variety of organisms as a measure of genetic and/or environmental stresses encountered during embryonic development. However, fluctuating asymmetry has not been widely used in humans in the diagnosis of congenital anomalies. Rather, assessment of patterns of minor anomalies has been utilized to infer the degree of embryonic developmental instability accompanying either genetic or teratogenic insults.
A minor anomaly is a structural feature seen in less than 4% of the general population, which is of no cosmetic or functional significance to the affected individual. Minor anomalies may or may not have functional or diagnostic significance when taken in the context of the entire child. In dysmorphology, minor anomalies have been useful in three distinct ways. First, some minor anomalies have been external markers of specific occult major anomalies. In addition, the vast majority of malformation syndromes in clinical genetics are recognizable as patterns of minor anomalies. Finally, although 15% of normal newborns have one or more minor anomalies, the finding of three or more minor anomalies is distinctly unusual. The risk of having a major occult abnormality increases proportionately with the number of minor defects present, with three or more minor anomalies signalling a 20% risk of a major occult structural defect.
In summary, just as fluctuating asymmetry may be a marker of abnormal environmental or genetic stress in the developing embryo, the presence of minor anomalies can be utilized to assess developmental instability.
Key wordsminor anomalies dysmorphology fluctuating asymmetry birth defects
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Aase, J. M., 1981. The dysmorphology detective. Ped Annals 20: 38–43.Google Scholar
- Alexander, G. L. & R. M. Norman, 1960. The Sturge-Weber syndrome. Wright and Son, Bristol.Google Scholar
- Carey, J. C., 1993. Auricular tags, pp. 214–216 in Human malformations and related anomalies, Vol. II. edited by R. E. Stevenson, J. G. Hall and R. M. Goodman. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Grebe, T. A., M. E. Rimsza, R. C. Hansen, S. F. Richter & H. E. Hoyme, 1992. Expanding the clinical spectrum of epidermal nevus syndrome: two cases with new findings and literature review. Proc. Greenwood Genet. Center 11: 109.Google Scholar
- Hoyme, H. E., 1987. Minor malformations: Significant or insignificant? Ann. J. Dis. Child. 141: 947.Google Scholar
- Jones, K. L., 1988. Smith's Recognizable Patterns of Human Malformation, 4th ed. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders Co., pp. 662–681.Google Scholar
- Mehes, K., 1983. Minor malformations in the neonate. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.Google Scholar
- Pinsky, L., 1985. Informative morphogenetic variants: Minor cogenital anomalies revisited, pp. 135–170. Issues and Reviews in Teratology, edited by H. Kalter. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Ribnik, L. R. & H. E. Hoyme, 1989. Natal teeth in Native Americans. Am. J. Human. Genet. 45: A59.Google Scholar
- Stevenson, R. E. & J. G. Hall, 1993. Terminology, pp. 21-30 in J. G. Hall & R. M. Goodman eds. Human malformations and related anomalies, Vol. I, edited by R. E. Stevenson, J. G. Hall and R. M. Goodman. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Thoday, J. M., 1958. Homeostasis in a selection experiment. Heredity 12: 401–415.Google Scholar