Fluctuating asymmetry occurs when an individual is unable to undergo identical development on both sides of a bilaterally symmetrical trait. Fluctuating asymmetry measures the sensitivity of development to a wide array of genetic and environmental stresses. We propose that fluctuating asymmetry is used in many signalling contexts for assessment of an individual's ability to cope with its environment. We hypothesize that fluctuating asymmetry is used in sexual selection, both in fighting and mate choice, and in competition for access to resources. Evidence is reviewed showing that the patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in secondary sexual characters differ from those seen in other morphological traits. Secondary sexual characters show much higher levels of fluctuating asymmetry. Also, there is often a negative relationship between fluctuating asymmetry and the absolute size of ornaments, whereas the relationship is typically U-shaped in other morphological traits. The common negative relationship between fluctuating asymmetry and ornament size suggests that many ornaments reliably reflect individual quality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Alatalo, R. V., J. Höglund & A. Lundberg, 1988. Patterns of variation in tail ornament size in birds. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 34: 363–374.
Andersson, M., 1982a. Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 17: 375–393.
Andersson, M., 1982b. Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature, Lond. 299: 818–820.
Andersson, M., 1986. Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40: 804–820.
Bailit, H. L., P. L. Workman, J. D. Niswander & C. J. MacLean, 1970. Dental asymmetry as an indicator of genetic and environmental conditions in human populations. Human Biol. 42: 626–638.
Balmford, A. & A. Thomas, 1992. Swallowing ornamental asymmetry. Nature, Lond. 359: 487.
Biémont, C., 1983. Homeostasis, enzymatic heterozygosity and inbreeding depression in natural populations ofDrosophila melanogaster. Genetica 61: 179–189.
Boag, P. T. & P. R. Grant, 1981. Intense natural selection in a population of Darwin's finches (Geospizinae) in the Galápagos. Science 214: 82–85.
Borgia, G. & G. Wilkinson, 1992. Swallowing ornamental asymmetry. Nature, Lond. 359: 487–488.
Brown, R. D., 1984. Antler Development in Cervidae. Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Kingsville.
Bubenik, G. A. & A. B. Bubenik, Eds., 1990. Horns, Pronghorns and Antlers. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Burley, N., S. C. Tidemann & K. Halupka, 1991. Bill colour and parasite levels of zebra finches, pp. 359–376 in Bird-Parasite Interactions: Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour, edited by J. E. Loye & M. Zuk. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Clarke, G. M. & J. A. McKenzie, 1987. Developmental stability of insecticide resistant phenotypes in blowfly; a result of canalizing natural selection. Nature, Lond. 325: 345–346.
Coates, B. J., 1990. The Birds of Papua New Guinea, Volume II Passerines. Dove Publications, Queensland.
Conner, J., 1988. Field measurements of natural and sexual selection in the fungus beetle,Bolitotherus cornutus. Evolution 42: 736–749.
Darwin, C., 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray, London.
Dawkins, M. S. & T. Guilford, 1991. The corruption of honest signalling. Anim. Behav. 41: 865–873.
Delius, J. D. & G. Habers, 1978. Symmetry: Can pigeons conceptualize it? Behav. Biol. 22: 336–342.
Delius, J. D. & B. Nowak, 1982. Visual symmetry recognition by pigeons. Psychol. Res. 44: 199–212.
Eberhard, W., 1989. Animal Genitalia. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Endler, J. A., 1983. Natural and sexual selection on colour patterns in poeciliid fishes. Environ. Biol. Fishes 8: 173–190.
Evans, M. R. & A. L. R. Thomas, 1992. Aerodynamic and mechanical effects of elongated tails in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird: Measuring the cost of a handicap. Anim. Behav. 43: 337–347.
Fisher, R. A., 1930. The genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon, Oxford.
Fisher, R. A. & S. B. Holt, 1944. The experimental modification of dominance in Danforth's short tailed mutant mice. Ann. Eugen. 12: 102–120.
Freeland, W. J., 1976. Pathogens and the evolution of primate sociality. Biotropica 8: 11–24.
Freeland, W. J., 1981. Parasitism and behavioral dominance among male mice. Science, Wash. 213: 461–462.
Grafen, A., 1990a. Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. J. theor. Biol. 144: 475–516.
Grafen, A., 1990b. Biological signals as handicaps. J. theor. Biol. 144: 517–546.
Graham, J. H. & J. D. Felley, 1985. Genomic coadaptation and developmental stability within introgressed populations ofEnneacanthus gloriosus andE. obesus (Pisces, Centrarchidae). Evolution 39: 104–114.
Hamilton, W. D. & M. Zuk, 1982. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science, Wash. 218: 384–387.
Heywood, J. S., 1989. Sexual selection by the handicap mechanism. Evolution 43: 1387–1397.
Hill, G. E., 1991. Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature, Lond. 350: 337–339.
Hoelzer, G. A., 1989. The good parent process of sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 38: 1067–1078.
Hoffmann, A. A. & P. A. Parsons, 1989a. An integrated approach to environmental stress tolerance and life history variation: Desiccation tolerance inDrosophila. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 37: 117–136.
Hoffmann, A. A. & P. A. Parsons, 1989b. Selection for increased desiccation tolerance inDrosophila melanogaster: Additive genetic control and correlated responses to other stresses. Genetics 122: 837–845.
Iwasa, Y., A. Pomiankowski & S. Nee, 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences II. The handicap principle. Evolution 45: 1431–1442.
Johnson, L. L. & M. S. Boyce, 1991. Female choice of males with low parasite loads in sage grouse, pp. 377–388 in Bird-Parasite Interactions: Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour, edited by J. E. Loye & M. Zuk. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Jones, J. S., 1987. An asymmetrical view of fitness. Nature, Lond. 325: 298–299.
Kat, P. W., 1982. The relationship between heterozygosity for enzyme loci and developmental homeostasis in peripheral populations of aquatic bivalves (Unionidae). Am. Nat. 119: 824–832.
Kodric-Brown, A. & J. H. Brown, 1984. Truth in advertising: the kinds of traits favored by sexual selection. Am. Nat. 124: 303–323.
Lande, R., 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 3721–3725.
Leamy, L. & W. Atchley, 1985. Directional selection and developmental instability: Evidence from fluctuating asymmetry of morphometric characters in rats. Growth 49: 8–18.
Leary, R. F. & F. W. Allendorf, 1989. Fluctuating asymmetry as an indicator of stress: Implications for conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4: 214–217.
Leary, R. F., F. W. Allendorf & R. L. Knudsen, 1983. Developmental stability and enzyme heterozygosity in rainbow trout. Nature, Lond. 301: 71–72.
Leary, R. F., F. W. Allendorf & R. L. Knudsen, 1984. Superior developmental stability of heterozygotes of enzyme loci in salmonid fishes. Am. Nat. 124: 540–541.
Leary, R. F., F. W. Allendorf & R. L. Knudsen, 1985a. Inheritance of meristic variation and the evolution of developmental stability in rainbow trout. Evolution 39: 308–314.
Leary, R. F., F. W. Allendorf & R. L. Knudsen, 1985b. Developmental instability and high meristic counts in interspecific hybrids of salmonid fishes. Evolution 39: 1318–1326.
Lerner, I. M., 1954. Genetic Homeostasis. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
Livshits, G. & E. Kobyliansky, 1991. Fluctuating asymmetry as a possible measure of developmental homeostasis in humans: A review. Human Biol. 63: 441–466.
Ludwig, W., 1932. Das Rechts-Links Problem im Tierreich und beim Menschen. Springer, Berlin.
Manning, J. T. & M. A. Hartley, 1991. Symmetry and ornamentation are correlated in the peacock's train. Anim. Behav. 42: 1020–1021.
Markow, T. & J. P. Ricker, 1992. Male size, developmental stability, and mating success in natural populations of threeDrosophila species. Heredity 69: 122–127.
Mather, K., 1953. Genetic control of stability in development. Heredity 7: 297–336.
Maynard Smith, J., 1978. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Milkman, R., 1970. The genetic basis of natural variation inDrosophila melanogaster. Adv. Genet. 15: 55–114.
Mitton, J. B. & M. C. Grant, 1984. Associations among protein heterozygosity, growth rate and developmental homeostasis. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 479–499.
Møller, A. P., 1988. Female choice selects for male tail ornaments in the monogamous swallow. Nature, Lond. 332: 640–642.
Møller, A. P., 1989. Viability costs of male tail ornaments in a swallow. Nature, Lond. 339: 132–135.
Møller, A. P., 1990a. Fluctuating asymmetry in male sexual ornaments may reliably reveal male quality. Anim. Behav. 40: 1185–1187.
Møller, A. P., 1990b. Male tail length and female mate choice in the monogamous swallowHirundo rustica. Anim. Behav. 39: 458–465.
Møller, A. P., 1991a. Sexual selection in the monogamous barn swallow (Hirundo rustica). I. Determinants of tail ornament size. Evolution 45: 1823–1836.
Møller, A. P., 1991b. Sexual ornaments size and the cost of fluctuating asymmetry. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 243: 59–62.
Møller, A. P., 1992a. Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in weapons: Evidence for reliable signalling of quality in beetle horns and bird spurs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 248: 199–206.
Møller, A. P., 1992b. Parasites differentially increase the degree of fluctuating asymmetry in secondary sexual characters. J. evol. Biol. 5: 691–699.
Møller, A. P., 1992c. Females prefer large and symmetrical ornaments. Nature, Lond. 357: 238–240.
Møller, A. P., 1992d. Swallowing ornamental asymmetry. Nature, Lond. 359: 488.
Møller, A. P., 1993a. Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in sexual ornaments predict female choice. J. evol. Biol. (in press).
Møller, A. P., 1993b. The function of symmetric flowers. Submitted to J. evol. Biol.
Møller, A. P., 1993c. Symmetrical male sexual ornaments, paternal care, and offspring quality. Behav. Ecol. (in press).
Møller, A. P., 1993d. Sexual selection in the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica). IV. Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry and selection against asymmetry. Evolution. (in press).
Møller, A. P. & M. Eriksson, 1993a. Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in flowers: Implications for sexual selection in plants. J. evol. Biol. (in press).
Møller, A. P. & M. Eriksson, 1993b. Flower asymmetry and sexual selection in plants. Submitted to Ecology.
Møller, A. P. & J. Höglund, 1991. Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in avian feather ornaments: Implications for models of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 245: 1–5.
Møller, A. P. & J. Höglund, 1993. Fluctuating asymmetry and tail length in birds: Do long-tailed individuals always have less asymmetry? ms.
Møller, A. P. & A. Pomiankowski, 1993. Why have animals got multiple sexual ornaments? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32: 167–176.
Nur, N. & O. Hasson, 1984. Phenotypic plasticity and the handicap principle. J. theor. Biol. 110: 275–297.
Otronen, M., 1988. Intra- and intersexual interactions at breeding burrows in the horned beetle,Coprophanaeus ensifer. Anim. Behav. 36: 741–748.
Palmer, A. R. & C. Strobeck, 1986. Fluctuating asymmetry: Measurement, analysis, pattern. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 391–421.
Parsons, P. A., 1962. Maternal age and developmental variability. J. Exp. Biol. 39: 251–260.
Parsons, P. A., 1990. Fluctuating asymmetry: An epigenetic measure of stress. Biol. Rev. 65: 131–145.
Petrie, M., T. R. Halliday & C. Sanders, 1990. Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains. Anim. Behav. 41: 323–331.
Pomiankowski, A., 1988. The evolution of female mate preferences for male genetic quality. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 5: 136–184.
Pomiankowski, A., Y. Iwasa & S. Nee, 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences. I. Fisher and biased mutation. Evolution 45: 1422–1430.
Pomiankowski, A. & A. P. Møller, 1993. Fluctuating asymmetry and the strength of sexual selection. ms.
Prout, T., 1962. The effects of stabilizing selection on the time of development inDrosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 3: 364–382.
Reeve, E. C. R., 1960. Some genetic tests on asymmetry of sternopleural chaeta number inDrosophila. Genet. Res., Camb. 1: 151–172.
Rensch, B., 1958. Die Wirksamkeit ästhetischer Faktoren bei Wirbeltieren. Z. Tierpsychol. 15: 447–461.
Ryan, M. J., 1988. Energy, calling and selection. Am. Zool. 28: 885–898.
Sciulli, P. W., W. J. Doyle, C. Kelley, P. Siegel & M. I. Siegel, 1979. The interaction of stressors in the induction of increased levels of fluctuating asymmetry in the laboratory rat. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 50: 279–284.
Siegel, M. I. & W. J. Doyle, 1975. The differential effect of prenatal and postnatal audiogenic stress on fluctuating dental asymmetry. J. Exp. Zool. 191: 211–214.
Soulé, M. E., 1979. Heterozygosity and developmental stability: Another look. Evolution 33: 396–401.
Soulé, M. E., 1982. Allomeric variation. 1. The theory and some consequences. Am. Nat. 120: 751–764.
Soulé, M. E. & J. Cuzin-Roudy, 1982. Allomeric variation. 2. Developmental instability of extreme phenotypes. Am. Nat. 120: 765–786.
Spurrier, M. F., M. S. Boyce & B. F. J. Manly, 1991. Effects of parasites on mate choice by captive sage grouse, pp. 389–398 in Bird-Parasite Interactions: Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour, edited by J. E. Loye & M. Zuk. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Taylor, P. D. & G. C. Williams, 1982. The lek paradox is not resolved. Theor. Pop. Biol. 22: 392–409.
Tebb, G. & J. M. Thoday, 1958. Stability in development and relational balance of X chromosomes inD. melanogaster. Nature, Lond. 174: 1109–1110.
Thoday, J. M., 1956. Balance, heterozygosity and developmental stability. Cold Spring Habor Symp. Quant. Biol. 21: 318–326.
Thoday, J. M., 1958. Homeostasis in a selection experiment. Heredity 12: 401–415.
Thornhill, R., 1992a. Fluctuating asymmetry and the mating system of the Japanese scorpionfly,Panorpa japonica. Anim. Behav. 44: 867–879.
Thornhill, R., 1992b. Female preference for the pheromone of males with low fluctuating asymmetry in the Japanese scorpionfly (Panorpa japnica, Mecoptera). Behav. Ecol. 3: 277–283.
Thornhill, R. & P. Sauer, 1992. Genetic sire effects on the fighting ability of sons and daughters and mating success of sons in a scorpionfly. Anim. Behav. 43: 255–264.
Valentine, D. W. & M. E. Soulé, 1973. Effect ofp,p′-DDT on developmental stability of pectoral fin rays in the grunion,Leuresthes tenius. Fishery Bull. 71: 920–921.
Van Valen, L., 1962. A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution 16: 125–142.
Vehrencamp, S. L., J. W. Bradbury & R. M. Gibson, 1989. The energetic cost of display in male sage grouse. Anim. Behav. 38: 885–896.
Vrijenhoek, R. C. & S. Lerman, 1982. Heterozygosity and developmental stability under sexual and asexual breeding systems. Evolution 36: 768–776.
Zahavi, A., 1975. Mate selection — a selection for a handicap. J. theor. Biol. 53: 205–214.
Zahavi, A., 1987. The theory of signal selection and some of its implications, pp. 305–327 in International Symposium of Biological Evolution, edited by V. P. Delfino. Adriatic Editrice, Bari.
Zakharov, V. M., 1981. Fluctuating asymmetry as an index of developmental homeostasis. Genetiks (Belgrade) 13: 241–256.
About this article
Cite this article
Møller, A.P., Pomiankowski, A. Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Genetica 89, 267 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02424520
- fluctuating asymmetry
- reliable signalling
- sexual selection