Comparison of VNTR allele frequencies and inclusion probabilities over six populations
- 67 Downloads
There is considerable debate about the methodologies used to estimate VNTR (Variable Number of Tandem Repeats) multi-locus genotype frequencies or odds of inclusion in forensic cases. To compare two of the methods in use, allele frequency distributions among six populations were compared and the effect of population heterogeneity on VNTR multi-locus genotype frequency estimation was examined. Genotype frequencies estimated from single population data were one or two orders of magnitude smaller than those estimated by picking the highest allele frequency in a group of subpopulations to estimate genotype frequencies using a ceiling principle. The average change does not appear to be very sensitive to the set of subpopulations used; four locus frequencies still give inclusion odds of one in a million or less. We think that use of the ceiling principle solves both the statistical problem engendered by subpopulation heterogeneity and the legal problem of assuming that the prepetrator and suspect belong to the same subpopulation. The counterintuitive fact of human genetic polymorphism is that it is easier to identify an individual than it is to identify the subpopulation, ethnic group or race to which that individual belongs.
KeywordsAllele Frequency Genetic Polymorphism Tandem Repeat Genotype Frequency Population Data
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Budowle, B.,et al., 1991. A preliminary report on binned general population data on six VNTR loci in caucasians, blacks and hispanics from the United States. Crime Lab. Dig. 18: 9–26.Google Scholar
- Budowle, B., A. M. Giusti, J. S. Waye, F. S. Baechtel, R. M. Fourney, D. E. Adams, L. A. Presley, H. A. Deadman & K. L. Monson, 1991. Fixed-bin analysis for statistical evaluation of continuous distributions of allelic data from VNTR loci, for use in forensic comparisons. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 48: 841–855.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dobzhansky, T., 1962. Mankind Evolving, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
- Kirby, Lorne, 1990. DNA Fingerprinting-An Introduction. Stockton Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Lander, E., in J. Ballantyne, G. Sensabaugh and J. Witkowski, 1989. DNA Technology and Forensic Science. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, N.Y. 143–156.Google Scholar
- Lewontin, R., 1972. The apportionment of human diversity. Evol. Biol. 6: 381–398.Google Scholar
- National Research Council, DNA Technology in Forensic Science, 1992. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C..Google Scholar
- Roychoudhury, A. & M. Nei, 1988. Human Polymorphic Genes World Distribution, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf, 1969. Biometry. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
- Weir, B., 1993. Forensic Population Genetics and the NRC. Amer. J. Hum. Genet. (in press February).Google Scholar