Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 245–263 | Cite as

Climate and prehistory on the Yucatan peninsula

  • Bruce H. Dahlin
Article

Abstract

Long held notions that climate has been stable over the Yucatan peninsula and that today's climate is an accurate reflection of past climates here are being challenged today by a number of researchers. Both empirical and circumstantial evidence are offered for a prolonged and severe period of dessication in the Maya lowlands and its effects on soils, vegetation, lake levels and ancient Maya cultural processes, ca. 50 B.C. to 500 A.D. After centuries of steady and precocious growth and development, Late Preclassic Maya civilization in the drier northern two thirds of the peninsula abruptly collapsed, probably due to repeated crop failures and decreasing availabilities of potable water due to severe drought conditions. This is nowhere more apparent than at the predominantly Preclassic ruins of El Mirador - the largest known ancient Maya city - which was almost totally abandoned by A.D. 250. Thereafter, the development of classicism was confined to a small and better watered area in extreme northeastern Guatemala, northern Belize and southern Quintana Roo, which was defended from invaders from the north by a line of fortified sites.

Keywords

Potable Water Drought Condition Lake Level Severe Drought Cultural Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and notes

  1. 1.
    G. R. Willey, A. L. Smith, G. Tourtellot, III, and I. Graham, Pap. Peabody Mus. Aichaeol. Ethnology. Harv. Univ. 13 (1), 20 (1975).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Huntington,Civilization and Climate (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, 1915); Int. Cong. Amer. 19 (1917).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. L. Page, Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publi., 431 (1933) and 437 (1938).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. F. Hattet al., Cransbrook Inst. Sci. 33 (1953) pp. 3809.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. A. Sanchez and J. E. Kutzbach,Quarter. Res. 4 (1974).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. A. Bryson and T. J. Murray,Climates of Hunger (Univ. of Wisc. Press, Madison, 1977).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Gunn and R. E. W. Adams. Manuscript.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. E. P. Brooks,Climate Through the Ages (Dover, New York, 1970); E. Garcia, Bol. Inst. Geogr. 5 (1974); W. M. Wendland and R. A. Bryson,Quart. Res. 4 (1974); H. H. Lamb,Climatic History and the Future (Methuen, London, 1977).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Denton and W. Karlen,Quarter. Res. 3 (1973).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    See Wendland and Bryson in (8)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    U. M. Cowgill and G. E. Hutchinson,Mem. Conn. Aca. Arts and Sci. 17 (1966); M. Tzukada and E. S. Deevey, inQuaternary Paleoecology, E. Cushing and H. Wright Jr. (eds.), (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, 1967).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. S. Deevey, D. S. Rice, P. M. Rice, H. H. Vaughan, M. Brenner, M. S. Flannery,Science 206, 302 (1979).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. H. Vaughan, paper presented at the Soc. Amer. Archaeol. (1978); Ph. D. dissertation (Univ. Microfilms, Ann Arbor, 1979).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. H. Vaughan, personal communication.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    After 500 A.D., seasonality, rainfall and lake levels increased. Evidence of other dry intervals is observable in shell layers and concommitant decreases in aquatic plant pollens in the Quexil core, but climate appears to have resumed its overall moist character at this time.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Covich,Limnol. and Oceanogr. 21 (1976).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Covich and M. Struiver,Limnol. and Oceanogr. 19 (1974).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    L. G. Price, M. A. thesis, Wash. Univ., St. Louis (1974).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Price's stratigraphy also suggests that a high relatively stable lake level had been achieved again by 1000 A.D. and remained so until 1400 A.D.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    W. J. Folan, J. Gunn, J. D. Eaton, and R. W. Patch. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    G. E. Stuart, personal communication.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    I. Graham,Mid. Amer. Res. Inst. 33 (1967); R. T. Matheny (ed.), El Mirador, Peten Guatemala (New World Archaeol.Found. Publi. 45, 1980).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Contra P. D. Harrison in Social Process in Maya Prehistory, N. Hammond (ed.), (Academic Press, 1977).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    B. H. Dahlin, J. E. Foss, M. E. Chambers (New World Archaeol. Found. Publ. 45, 1980).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. W. Ball, inThe Origins of Maya Civilization, R. E. W. Adams (ed.), (Univ. New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, 1977).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    E. Wyllys Andrews, V., personal communication; (7), 117.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    R. E. Smith, Pap. Peabody Mus. Archaeol.Ethnology Harv. Univ. 66 (1971).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    F. W. Nelson Jr.,Pap. New World Archaeol. Found. 33 (1973).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    D. Webster,Cuca, Chacchob and Dzonot Ake (Penn. State Univ. Press, University Park, 1979).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    D. W. Forsyth, Ph.D. dissertation (Univ. Microfilms, Ann Arbor, 1979).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    R. T. Matheny,Science 193 (1976).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    R.E.W. Adams, inThe Origins of Maya Civilization, R. E. W. Adams (ed.), (Univ. of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, 1977).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    J.W. Ball, personal communication.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    R. Rands, inThe Origins of Maya Civilization, R. E. W. Adams (ed.), (Univ. of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, 1977), pp. 161–176.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    G. R. Wiley, inThe Origins of Maya Civilization, R. E. W. Adams (ed.), (Univ. of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, 1977), p. 151; J. W. Ball,Pap. New World Archaeol. Found. 43 (1980).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    W. Back and B. B. Hanshaw, inGeology and Hydrogeology of Northeastern Yucatan, W. G. Ward and A. E. Weidie (eds.), (New Orleans Geol. Soc., 1970).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    W. Back, personal communication.Google Scholar
  38. 39.
    A. S. Pearse, E. P. Greaser, F. G. Hall,Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. 457 (1936).Google Scholar
  39. 40.
    N. Hammond, inArchaeology in Northern Belize, British Mus. Cambridge Univ. Corozal Project, 1974–75 Interim Report (1975).Google Scholar
  40. 41.
    W. R. Bullard,Pap. Royal Ontario Mus. Art and Archaeol. 9 (1965).Google Scholar
  41. 42.
    A. H. Siemens, inPrehispanic Maya Agriculture, P. D. Harrison and B. L. Turner (eds.), (Univ. New Mexico Press, 1978).Google Scholar
  42. 43.
    W. D. Denevan,Science 169 (1970); A. H. Siemens and D. E. Puleston,Am. Antiq. 37, 228 (1972).Google Scholar
  43. 44.
    B. L. Turner and P. D. Harrison,Science 213, 403 (1981); see 40.Google Scholar
  44. 45.
    B. H. Dahlin,Journ. Belizean Affairs 5 (1977).Google Scholar
  45. 46.
    N. Hammond, personal communication.Google Scholar
  46. 47.
    S. G. Morley,The Ancient Maya, revised by G. W. Brainard (Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, 1956). Fig. 1.Google Scholar
  47. 48.
    R. E. W. Adams and P. D. Harrison, inLowland Maya Settlement Patterns, W. Ashmore (ed.) (Univ. New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 235–7 and 284 respectively, 1981).Google Scholar
  48. 49.
    D. E. Puleston and D. W. Callendar,Expedition 9 (1967).Google Scholar
  49. 50.
    W. A. Haviland,World Archaeol. 16, 190 (1970).Google Scholar
  50. 51.
    A. Ford, Personal communication.Google Scholar
  51. 52.
    T. P. Culbert, inThe Origins of Maya Civilization, R. E. W. Adams (ed.), (Univ. of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, 1977), p. 33.Google Scholar
  52. 53.
    B. H. Dahlin and M. E. Chambers,Water Management Facilities at Tikal, Tikal Report #24 (in preparation).Google Scholar
  53. 54.
    J. M. Longyear,Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publi, 597 (1952). Willeyet al.,Pap. Peabody Mus. Archaeol. Ethnology Harv. Univ. 54, 525–8 (1965); G. R. Willey and A. E. Smith,Pap. Peabody Mus. Archaeol. Ethnology Harv. Univ. 62, 1, (1969); D. S. Rice,Journ. Field Archaeol. 3 (1976).Google Scholar
  54. 55.
    H. Moholy-Nagy,Amer. Antiq. 43 (1978).Google Scholar
  55. 56.
    Elsewhere I tried to explain this paucity of freshwater shell as one resulting from a volcanic eruption that blanketed the region with small angular ejecta that interfered with the respiratory and digestive tracts of molluscan fauna. See B. H. Dahlin., inMaya Archaeology and Ethnohistory, N. Hammond and G. R. Willey (eds.), (Univ. of Texas Press, Austin, 1979).Google Scholar
  56. 57.
    Linda Schiele, personal communication.Google Scholar
  57. 58.
    C. C. Coggins, inMaya Archaeology and Ethnohistory, N. Hammond and G. R. Willey (eds.), (Univ. of Texas Press, Austin, 1979).Google Scholar
  58. 59.
    The research at El Mirador has been funded by the National Science Foundation (#BNS77-25593 and BNS79-24774). The National Geographic Society, The New World Archaeological Foundation, and private donors. I am grateful to these funders as well as to R. E. W. Adams, Joel Gunn, William Folan, Payson D. Sheets, Joseph W. Ball, E. Wyllys Andrews V., Clemency Coggins, and Edward Deevey for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper, and to Andrea Dahlin for her patience and editorial assistance.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce H. Dahlin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations