Skip to main content
Log in

Consumers as targets: Autonomy, accountability, and anticipation of the influence process

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given their limited financial resources, shoppers generally appreciate the practical necessities of resisting sales pitches and other promotional activities destined to entice them into inopportune purchases. At the same time, ventures into the marketplace represent practical necessities for nearly everyone as well as significant forms of entertainment (Prus and Dawson, 1991; Prus, 1993) for a great many people. This generates a series of interactional dilemmas for almost everyone in western society as they attempt to pursue their interests in conjunction with the salespeople they encounter. Building on data from a larger study of consumer practices, this paper considers the ways in which buyers attempt to maintain control over the lines of action they develop in potential purchasing contexts. In particular, attention is given to the ways in which people manage intimacy and distancing in shopping contexts by focusing on (a) people’s preferences for self-serve versus service settings and (b) shoppers anticipations as targets of the influence process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the Extended Self.Journal of Consumer Research 15: 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969).Symbolic Interactionism. Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. (1959). The Cab Driver and His Fare.American Journal of Sociology 65: 158–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. A. (1957).Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, Illinois: Row, Peterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1956). The Nature of Deference and Demeanor.American Anthropologist 58: 473–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemert, E. (1953). An Isolation and Closure Theory of Naive Check Forgery.The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science 44: 296–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934).Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prus, R. (1976). Religious Recruitment and the Management of Dissonance: A Sociological Perspective.Sociological Inquiry 46(2): 127–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prus, R. (1989a).Making Sales: Influence as Interpersonal Accomplishment. Newbury Park, Ca.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prus, R. (1989b).Pursuing Customers: An Ethnography of Marketing Activities. Newbury Park, Ca.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prus, R. (1991). Just Browsing Thanks: Focused and Diffuse Shopping Practices. Pp. 296–302 in Terry L. Childerset al., 1991 AMA Winter Educators’ Conference Proceedings. Volume 2. Chicago, Illinois: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prus, R. (1993). Shopping with Companions: Images, Influences, and Interpersonal Dilemmas.Qualitative Sociology 16(2): 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prus, R. (Forthcoming) Elusive Targets: Reluctant Involvements and Evasive Tactics on the Part of Shoppers (in progress).

  • Prus, R. and L. Dawson (1991). Shop til You Drop: Shopping as Recreational and Laborious Activity.Canadian Journal of Sociology 16: 145–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prus, R. and W. Frisby (1990). Persuasion as Practical Accomplishment: Tactical Manoeuverings at Home (Party Plan) Shows.” Pp. 133–162 inCurrent Research on Occupations and Professions, Volume 5, edited by Helena Znaniecki Lopata. Greenwich, Conn.: Jai Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1907).The Philosophy of Money (translated by Tom Bottomore and David Frisby). Boston, Mass.: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1950).The Sociology of Georg Simmel (Kurt Wolff, trans and ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prus, R. Consumers as targets: Autonomy, accountability, and anticipation of the influence process. Qual Sociol 17, 243–262 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02422254

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02422254

Keywords

Navigation