, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 232–236 | Cite as

Ethanol and methane fueled solid oxide fuel cells: A comparative study

  • S. Douvartzides
  • P Tsiakaras


Ethanol and methane are compared as candidate fuels for generation of electrical power in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFCs). The thermodynamic analysis of both alternatives was undertaken considering that a SOFC operates with the equilibrium products of the steam reforming of each raw fuel. The comparison was made assuming SOFC operation under atmospheric total pressure in the temperature range of 800–1200K, and results were obtained in terms of the maximun theoretical electromotive force (emf) and the thermodynamic efficiency of total energy conversion. It was found that although methane fueled SOFCs are able to provide slightly higher efficiencies, ethanol is a competitive alternative fuel with suitable characteristics.


Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Methane Steam Ethanol Steam Carbonization Boundary Candidate Fuel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

5. References

  1. [1]
    S.H. Clarke, A.L. Dicks, K. Pointon, T.A. Smith and A. Swann, Catalysis Today38, 411–423 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    D.E. Ridler and M.V. Twigg,Steam reforming, in Catalyst Handbook, M.V. Twigg, Ed., 1996, Manson Publishing Ltd.: London, England, Chapter 5.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    N. Giordano, F. Frusteri, P. Tsiakaras and A. Parmaliana, Proceedings of the Fuel Cell Seminar, Tuscon, USA, 1986: p. 230–233.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. Parmaliana, F. Frusteri, P. Tsiakaras and N. Giordano, Int. Journal of Hydrogen Energy13, 729–734 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    G. Maggio, S. Freni and S. Cavallaro, Journal of Power Sources74, 17–23 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    E.Y. Garcia and M.A. Laborde, International Journal of Hydrogen Ennergy16, 307–312 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    K. Vasudeva, N. Mitra, P. Umasankar and S.C. Dhingra, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy21, 13–18 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    I. Fishtik, A. Alexander, R. Datta and D. Geana, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy25, 31–45 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    P. Tsiakaras, A. Demin, S. Douvartzides and N. Georgakakis, Ionics5, 206–212 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    R.H. Perry, D.W. Green and J.O. Maloney, Eds.Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook. 7th, ed., 1997, McGraw-Hill. Chapter 4, p. 33–34.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    J.H. Hirschenhofer, D.B. Stauffer, R.R. Engleman and M.G. Klett, Fuel Cell Handbook, 4th ed., 1999, Business/Technology Books, Orinda-USA.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    M.K. Evans,The economic impact of the demand for ethanol, Midwestern Governors' Conference, Illinois-USA, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IfI - Institute for Ionics 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Douvartzides
    • 1
  • P Tsiakaras
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringUniversity of ThessaliaVolosGreece

Personalised recommendations