Abstract
This paper examines the advantages of market power acquired or maintained through trademark. Without denying the benefits to consumers of trademark protection, several objections to trademark-based dominant positions are raised:-1- the possibility that in certain cases the social benefits are less than the sum of private benefits, and less than the social costs, of trademark protection;-2- the link between trademarks and incorrect perceptions of quality differentials; and-3- certain problems which may arise in tying two trademarked products.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bond, Ronald S. and David F. Lean, “Consumer Preference, Advertising and Sales: On the Advantage From Early Entry,” FTC Bureau of Economics Working Paper No. 14, October 1979.
Greer, Douglas F.,Industrial Organization and Public Policy, (New York: MacMillan, 1980).
Mincer, Jacob, “Comment,” following Holt, C. C. and M. H. David “The Concept of Job Vacancies in A Dynamic Theory of the Labor Market,”The Measurement and Interpretation of Job Vancancies (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1966).
Nelson, Phillip, “Information and Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Political Economy 78 (March/April 1970), 311–329.
Phillips, Owen R., “Product Bundles, Price Discrimination and a Two-Product Firm,” Department of Economics Working Paper No. 79–07, Texas A & M, October 1979.
Schmalensee, Richard, “Brand Loyalty and Barriers to Entry,”Southern Economic Journal 40 (April 1974), 579–588.
—, “On the Use of Economic Mokels in Antitrust: The ReaLemon Case,”University of Pennsylvania Law Review 127 (April 1979), 994–1050.
Stelzer, Irwin M.,Selected Antitrust Cases, 6th ed. (Homewood, Illinois: Irwom. 1981).
Additional information
Associate Professor of Economics, the Pennsylvania State University. The author thanks Eric Bond, Mark Roberts, Roger Sherman, and an anonymous referee for their comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feinberg, R. Trademarks, market power, and information. Rev Ind Organ 2, 376–385 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02418924
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02418924