Advertisement

Atomic Energy

, Volume 84, Issue 5, pp 351–357 | Cite as

Statistical analysis of correlated experimental data and neutron core sections evaluation

  • S. A. Badikov
Article

Keywords

Experimental Data Section Evaluation Core Section Neutron Core Correlate Experimental Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Lemmel, Short Guide to EXFOR. IAEA-NDS-1, Rev. 5 (1986).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Rose and C. Dunford, “Data formats and procedures for evaluated nuclear data file, ENDF-6,” BNL-NCS 44945, ENDF-102, Rev. 10/91 (1991).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. MacFarlane, D. Muir, and R. Boicourt, The NJOI Nuclear Data Processing System, Vols 1–4, LA-9303-M, ENDF-324, 1982–1985.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. V. Sinitsa and A. A. Rineyskiy, GRUCON-A Package of Applied Computer Programs, INDC (CCP)-344, IAEA, Vienna (1993).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Maerker, B. Broadhead, J. Wagschal, and M. Williams, LEPRICON: PWR Pressure Vessel Surveillance Dosimetry Analysis System, RSIC program PSR-277, ORNL (1990).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Fort, J. Rowlands, and M. Salvatores, “Covariance data requirements,” in: Proceedings of Special Meeting on Evaluation and Processing of Covariance Data, Oak Ridge, USA, October 7–9, 1992, p. 33, OECD, Paris, 1993.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Youssef, “Comparison of the PCA versus tungsten in the TIBER/ITER inboard shield and impact of nuclear data uncertainties on machine cost,” in: Proceedings of Special Meeting on Shielding Experiments and Analysis, Garching, Germany, February 12–14, 1990.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. A. Badikov and K. I. Zolotarev, “Evaluation of the93Nb(n, n′)93mNb and93Nb(n, 2n)92mNb reaction cross sections for threshold to 20 MeV,” in: ASTM STP 1228, Reactor Dosimetry (1994), pp. 694–703.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Tagesen, H. Vonach, S. A. Badikov, and V. G. Pronyaev, “Evaluation of fast neutron cross sections and covariance matrices of52Cr,” in: Proceedings of International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, May 9–13, 1994, Gatlinburg, USA, p. 620, ANS, La Grange Park, USA (1994).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. A. Badikov, S. Tagesen, and H. Vonach, “Evaluation of the46Ti(n, p)46Sc,48Ti(n, p)48Sc,58Ni(n, p)58Co, and60Ni(n, p)60Co reaction cross sections,” Physics Data 13-9, Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe (1996).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. A. Badikov and K. I. Zolotarev, “Evaluation of the237Np fission cross section in the energy range 100 keV-20 MeV,” in: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Reactor Dosimetry, September 2–6, 1996, Prague, Czech Republic, p. E145.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. A. Badikov et al., “Status of Russian dosimetry file” ibid Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Reactor Dosimetry, September 2–6, 1996, Prague, Czech Republic, p. E146.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. A. Badikov and E. V. Gai, “Correlation between experimental data sets and its influence on the evaluation of neutron cross sections,” in: Proceedings of International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, May 19–24, 1997, Trieste, Italy (1997), pp. 949–951.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ENDF/B-VI Summary Documentation, BNL-NCS-17541 (ENDF-201), 1991.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Nakagawa et al., “Japanese evaluated nuclear data library, Version 3, Revision 2,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol.,32, 1259 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. Molla et al., “Cross sections of (n, p), (n, α), and (n, 2n) processes on scandium, vanadium, cobalt, copper and zinc isotopes in the energy range 3.57–14.71 MeV” in: Proceedings of International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, May 9–13, 1994, Gatlinburg, USA, p. 938, ANS, La Grange Park, USA (1941).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Y. Ikeda et al., “New measurements of activation cross section for the63Cu(n, 2n)62Cu,65Cu(n, 2n)64Cu reactions in the energy range of 13.3–14.9 MeV,” ibid.in p. 944.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. Hetrick and C. Fu, “A generalized least squares program for updating of cross section evaluations with correlated data sets,” ORNO/TM-7341 (1980).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    N. Larson, Updated Users' Guide for SAMMY, ORNL/TM-9179/R2, UAS (1989).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Tagesen and V. Vonach, “Uncertainty estimates for the EFF files for52Cr,56Fe,58Ni,60Ni,” in: Proceedings of International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, May 13–17, 1991, Julich, Germany, Springer-Verlag (1992), p. 871.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. Nordborg, H. Gruppelaar, and M. Salvatores, “Status of the JEF and EFF projects,” ibid. in:, p. 782.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. I. Blokhin et al., “Current status of Russian nuclear data libraries,” in: Proceedings of International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, May 9–13, 1994, Gatlinburg, USA, p. 695, ANS, La Grange Park (1994).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    L. P. Abagyan et al., Group Constants for Calculation of Reactors and Shielding [in Russian], Énergoatomizdat, Moscow (1981).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    H. Vonach et al., Final Report for Contract Nr. 395-89-8/FU-D/NET, EFF-DOC-85 (1989).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    K. I. Zolotarev, V. N. Manokhin, and A. B. Pashchenko, “Estimate of the excitation function of the reaction141Pr(n, 2n)140Pr from threshold to 20 MeV,” Voprosy Atomnoi Nauki i Tekhniki, Ser. Yadernye Konstanty, No. 2, 31 (1994).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. A. Badikov

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations