Skip to main content
Log in

A quantitative approach to the design of antitumor drug dosage schedule via cell cycle kinetics and systems theory

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A discrete-time kinetic model for chemotherapy was developed to deal with the effects of antitumor drugs on the cell cycle and proliferation kinetics of experimental tumor cell populations in which cell kinetic responses of chemotherapy are represented in terms of perturbation of cell kinetic parameters—cell age, cell size and DNA content distributions. The time-course behavior of these cell kinetic parameters was predicted by solving the discrete-time state equations which characterize the dynamics of tumor-drug interactions. The amount of antitumor drug administered was expressed to be the control function of the state equations and the transition matrix representing two modes of drug action, namely, cell kill and progression delay or accumulation of cells due to drug, was derived. The performance of the model, assessed by examining the effects of cell cycle stage-specific agents such as cytosine arabinoside on spontaneous AKR leukemia, compared favorably with experimental data. Utilizing an optimization scheme in engineering systems studies, an analytical method is described for optimizing the regimen of drug administration so as to maximize the effectiveness of drug dosage schedules and minimize the use of toxic amounts of the drug. The superiority of the schedule designed by an optimization scheme was evident at the termination of therapy, although the schedule designed by experimental trials reduced the number of surviving tumor cells more effectively than the one designed by an optimization scheme during the earlier therapy period. In the model, the proposed schedule will function more effectively for the entire therapy period when additional parameters of drug characteristics, such as the toxicity to the host and drug resistance, are encompassed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhuyan, G. K., Fraser, T. J., Gray, L. G., Kuentzel, S. L., and Neil, G. L. Cell kill kinetics of severalS-phase-specific drugs.Cancer Research 1973,33, 888–894.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhuyan, G. K., Scheidt, L. G., and Fraser, T. J. Cell cycle phase specificity of antitumor agents.Cancer Research 1972,32, 398–407.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, W. R., Mecker, B. E., Powers, W. E., and Valeriote, F. A. Comparison of the dose- and time-survival curves for normal hematopoietic and lymphoma colony-forming cells exposed to vinblastine, vincristine, arabinosylcytosine, and amethopterin.Journal of National Cancer Institute, 1971,42, 1015–1025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, B., Todo, A., Ogawa, M., Gee, T., and Fried, J. Consideration of the cell cycle in chemotherapy of acute leukemia: recent results.Cancer Research 1971,36, 88–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devita, V. T., Bray, D. A., Bostick, F., and Bagley, C. M. The effect of chemotherapy on the growth of leukemia L1210, II: Persistence of a nitrosourea-induced change in the growth characteristics of transplant generation.Cell and Tissue Kinetics 1972,5, 459–466.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, L. T., and Wang, C. S.The discrete maximum principle. New York, Wiley, 1964, Pp. 110–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frei, E. III, Bickers, J. N., Hewlett, J. S., Montagne, L., Leary, W. V., and Talley, R. W. Dose schedule and antitumor studies of arabinosyl cytosine (NSC 63878).Cancer Research 1969,29, 1325–1332.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, G. M. A formalism describing the kinetics of some mammalian cell populations.Mathematical Bioscience 1970,6, 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. E., Hardy, W. G., and Zelen, M. Chemotherapeutic effects on Mammalian Tumor Cells, III: Modification of leukemia L1210 growth kinetics with an antimetabolite.Journal of National Cancer Institute 1966,36, 15–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karon, M., and Shirakawa, S. The locus of action of 1-β-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine in the cell cycle.Cancer Research 1969,29, 687–696.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karon, M., and Shirakawa, S. Effect of 1-β-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine on cell cycle passage time.Journal of National Cancer Institute 1970,45, 861–867.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., Bahrami, K., and Woo, K. B. A discrete-time model for cell age, size, and DNA distributions of proliferating cells and its application to movement of labelled cohort.IEEE Transaction of Biomedical Engineering 1974,BME-21, 387–398.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., and Woo, K. B. Kinetic analysis of cell size and DNA content distributions during tumor cell proliferation: Ehrlich ascites tumor study.Cell and Tissue Kinetics 1975,8, 199–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, I., Woodman, R. J., Gang, M., Sirica, A., Venditti, J. M., and Goldin, A. Influence of the state of advancement of leukemia L1210 in mice on the optimal schedule of treatment of cytosine arabinoside (NSC-63878).Cancer Chemotherapy Reports 1972,56, 327–334.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madoc-Jones, H., and Mauro, F. Interphase action of vinblastine and vincristine: Differences in their lethal action through the mitotic cycle of cultured mammalian cells.Journal of Cellular Physiology 1968,72, 185–196.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, F., and Madoc-Jones, H. Age response to X-radiation of murine lymphoma cells synchronizedin vivo.Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences 1969,63 686–691.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, F., and Madoc-Jones, H. Age responses of cultured mammalian cells to cytotoxic drugs.Cancer Research 1970,30, 1397–1408.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Momparler, R. L. A model for the chemotherapy of acute leukemia with 1-β-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine.Cancer Research 1974,34, 1775–1787.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neil, G. L., and Homan, E. R. The effect of dose interval on the survival of L1210 leukemic mice treated with DNA synthesis inhibitors.Cancer Research 1973,33, 895–901.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Omine, M., and Perry, S. Use of cell separation at 1 g for cytokinetic studies in spontaneous AKR leukemia.Journal of National Cancer Institute 1972,48, 697–704.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Omine, M., and Perry, S. Perturbation of leukemic cell population in AKR mice due to chemotherapy.Cancer Research 1973,33, 2596–2602.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Omine, M., Sarna, G. P., and Perry, S. Composition of leukemic cell populations in AKR leukemia and effects of chemotherapy.European Journal of Cancer 1973,9, 557–564.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skipper, H. E. The cell cycle and chemotherapy of cancer. In R. Baserga (Ed.),The cell cycle and cancer. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1971. Pp. 358–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skipper, H. E., and Perry, S. Kinetics of normal and leukemic leukocyte populations and relevance to chemotherapy.Cancer Research 1970,30, 1883–1897.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skipper, H. E., Schabel, F. M. Jr., Trader, M. W., Laster, W. R., Jr., Simpson-Herren, L., and Lloyd, H. H. Basic and therapeutic trial results obtained in the spontaneous AK leukemia (lymphoma) model: End of 1971.Cancer Chemotherapy Reports 1972,56, 273–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skipper, H. E., Schabel, F. M., Jr., and Wilcox, W. S. Experimental evaluation of potential anticancer agents, XXI. Scheduling of arabinosylcytosine to take advantage of itsS-phase specification against leukemia cells.Cancer Chemotherapy Reports 1967,51, 128–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, P. G., and Hahn, G. M. The application of age response functions to the optimization of treatment schedules.Cell and Tissue Kinetics 1971,4, 279–291.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tobey, R. A. Effects of cytosine arabinoside, daunomycin, mithramycin, azacytidine, adriamycin and camptothecin on mammalian cell cycle traverse.Cancer Research 1972,32, 2720–2725.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tobey, R. A., and Crissman, H. A. Use of flow microfluorometry in detailed analysis of effects of chemical agents on cell cycle progression.Cancer Research 1972,32, 2726–2732.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Valeriote, F. A. Cell kinetics and tumor therapy: An overview. In J. C. Hampton (Ed.),The cell cycle in malignancy and immunity. The AEC Symposium Series, Springfield, Virginia: NTIS, Department of Commerce, 1975, Pp. 387–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Putten, L. M. Are cell kinetic data relevant for the design of tumor chemotherapy schedules?Cell and Tissue Kinetics 1974,7, 493–504.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yataganas, X., Strife, A., Perez, A., and Clarkson, B. D. Microfluorimetric evaluation of cell kill kinetics with 1-β-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine.Cancer Research 1974,34, 2795–2806.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, M., Woo, K.B. & Perry, S. A quantitative approach to the design of antitumor drug dosage schedule via cell cycle kinetics and systems theory. Ann Biomed Eng 5, 12–33 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02409336

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02409336

Keywords

Navigation