Imitating the autistic child: Facilitating communicative gaze behavior

  • Ellenmorris Tiegerman
  • Louis H. Primavera


The nonverbal autistic child exhibits a persistent and characteristic feature known as gaze aversion. Since gaze interaction between the autistic child and the clinician [or adult] is a requisite experience in therapeutic learning, procedures that modify gaze behavior in autistic children serve an important clinical function. The present research was designed to investigate three kinds of adult-child interaction that differentially affected changes in gaze behavior. The interaction procedure in which the experimenter imitated the autistic child's object and action performances resulted in the greatest change in the frequency and the duration of gaze behavior. An analysis of these methodologies reveals information concerning contextual and therapeutic variables that affected the gaze behavior in six autistic children.


Characteristic Feature School Psychology Great Change Action Performance Autistic Child 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bateson, M. C. (1975). Mother-infant exchanges: The epigenesis of conversational interaction.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 236, 101–113.Google Scholar
  2. Bloom, L., & Lahey, M. (1978).Language development and language disorders. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Hutt, C., & Ounsted, C. (1966). The biological significance of gaze aversion with particular reference to the syndrome of infantile autism.Behavioral Science, 11, 346–356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Jaffe, J., Stern, D., & Peery, J. (1973). Conversational coupling of gaze behavior in prelinguistic human development.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 321–329.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lovaas, O. I. (1977).The autistic child: Language development through behavior modification. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  6. Morehead, D. M., & Morehead, A. (1974). From signal to sign: a Piagetian view of thought and language during the first two years. In R. L. Schiefelbusch & L. L. Lloyd (Eds.),Language perspectives—Acquisition, retardation and intervention. (pp. 153–190). Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  7. Stern, D. N. (1974). Mother and infant at play: The dyadic interaction involving facial, vocal and gaze behaviors. In M. Lewis & L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.),The effect of the infant on its caretaker (pp. 187–213). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Tiegerman, E., & Primavera, L. (1981). Object manipulation: An interactional strategy with autistic children,Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 11, 427–438.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tilton, J. R., & Ottinger, D. R. (1964). Comparison of the toy play behavior of autistic, retarded and normal children.Psychological Reports, 15, 967–975.Google Scholar
  10. White, B. L., Castle, P., & Held, R. (1964). Observations on the development of visually-directed reaching.Child Development, 35, 349–364.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Winer, B. J. (1971).Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Wolf, P. (1963). Observations on the early development of smiling. In B. Foss (Ed.),Determinants of infant behavior, Vol. 2, London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ellenmorris Tiegerman
    • 1
  • Louis H. Primavera
    • 2
  1. 1.Speech and Hearing CenterAdelphi UniversityGarden City
  2. 2.St. John's UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations