Skip to main content
Log in

Optimality of project financing: Theory and empirical implications in finance and accounting

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the 1980s a fairly active market developed in the private placement of limited recourse project financing. Although this form of financing is gaining in importance, we know very little about it. This article presents a theoretical analysis of project financing. In the model of the firm presented, outstanding risky debt gives rise to agency costs of underinvestment that are offset by the benefit of debt-related tax shields. The tradeoff specifies the optimal leverage for a firm. Within this framework, we consider the optimality of financing a new project with a nonrecourse project financing arrangement. We derive implications for 1) the characteristics of a new venture that will be project financed, 2) the wealth gains from project financing over that of financing with straight debt, and 3) the optimal allocation of debt across the different assets (the sponsor firm vs. the new venture). It is shown that a project financing arrangement, where the debt is optimally allocated to the sponsor firm and the new venture, increases value by reducing agency costs and increasing the value of tax shields (compared to the case of straight debt financing). The optimal allocation of debt in project financing involves assigning to the sponsor firm and the new venture debt levels equal to their individual optimal capital structures. Several testable empirical implications in finance and accounting are developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K.J., “The Role of Securities in the Optimal Allocation of Risk-Bearing,”Review of Economic Studies, 31, 91–96 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkovitch, E., and Kim, E.H., “Financial Contracting and Leverage Induced Over- and Under-Investment Incentives,” Working Paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Castle, G., “Project Financing—Guidelines for the Commercial Banker,”Journal of Commercial Bank Lending, 14–30 (1975).

  • Chemmanur, T.J., and John, K., “Optimal Incorporation and Structure of Debt Contracts for Multiproject Firms: A Corporate Control Perspective,” Working Paper, New York University (1989).

  • Chen, A.H., Kensinger, J.W., and Martin, J.D., “Project Financing as a Means of Preserving Financial Flexibility,” Working paper, University of Texas, Austin, Texas (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G.,Theory of Value, New York, Wiley (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Gazzar, S., Lilien, S., and Pastena, V., “The Use of Off-Balance Sheet Financing to Circumvent Financial Covenant Restrictions,”Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 4, 217–232 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimpel, J.The Medieval Machine: The Industrial Revolution of the Middle Ages, New York, Holt Rinehart Winston (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hite, G.L., and Owers, J.E., “Security Price Reactions Around Corporate Spin-Off-Announcements,”Journal of Financial Economics, 12, 409–436 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, C. “The Use of Loan Sales and Standby Letters of Credit by Commercial Banks,”Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 4, 111–124 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C., ed., “Symposium on the Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence,”Journal of Financial Economics, 11 (1983).

  • Jensen, M.C., and Meckling, W.H., “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,”Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C., and Ruback, R.S., “The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence,”Journal of Financial Economics, 11, 5–50 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, K., and Kalay, A., “Costly Contracting and Optimal Payout Constraints,”Journal of Finance, 37, 457–470 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • John, T.A., “Optimal Allocation of Debt and Wealth Effects of Spin-Offs,” Working Paper, New York University (1987).

  • John, T.A., “Mergers and Investment Incentives,”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 21, 393–413 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kensinger, J.W., and Martin, J.D., “Project Finance: Raising Money the Old-Fashioned Way,”Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 3 (1988).

  • Mao, J.C.T., “Project Financing: Funding the Future,”Financial Executive, 23–28 (1982).

  • McGinty, T.E.,Project Organization and Finance, Cleveland, OH, The Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Minahan, J.R., “Optimal Capital Structure, Internal Diversification, and Project Financing,” Working paper, University of Massachusetts at Boston (1988).

  • Myers, S., “Determinants of Corporate Borrowing,”Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 147–175 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevitt, P.K.,Project Financing, London, Euromoney Publications (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronen, J., and Sondhi, A.C., “Debt Capacity and Financial Contracting: Finance Subsidiaries,”Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 4, 237–256 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, L., “The Surge in Nonrecourse Financing,”Institutional Investor, 149–161 (1982).

  • Shah, S., and Thakor, A., “Optimal Capital Structure and Project Financing,”Journal of Economic Theory, 42, 209–243 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C.W., and Warner, J., “On Financial Contracting: An Analysis of Bond Covenants,”Journal of Financial Economics, 7 (2), 117–161 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

John, T.A., John, K. Optimality of project financing: Theory and empirical implications in finance and accounting. Rev Quant Finan Acc 1, 51–74 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02408406

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02408406

Key words

Navigation