Hyperfine Interactions

, Volume 61, Issue 1–4, pp 1427–1430 | Cite as

The influence of the skin effect on gamma detected pulsed NMRON signals

  • D. J. Isbister
  • D. H. Chaplin
Section C: New Developments and Methods 1231–1438


The influence of the skin effect on single and triple (spin echo) gamma detected pulsed NMRON signals is calculated using a density matrix approach within a pure Zeeman manifold. For single pulse NMRON the turn angle dependences of the signals for uniform and exponential profiles of the resonant nuclei are presented for a typical inhomogeneous broadening applicable to intermediate mass impurities in ferromagnetic hosts. For triple pulse NMRON the baseline and principal spin echo amplitudes for equal resonant rf pulses are presented for the same inhomogeneous broadening. It is found that the skin effect leads to the form of pulsed NMRON signals that are in accord with experiment.


Thin Film Manifold Density Matrix Single Pulse Skin Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. /1/.
    D.H. Chaplin and G.V.H. Wilson, Low Temperature Nuclear Orientation, eds N.J. Stone and H. Postma (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1986) Chapter 14.Google Scholar
  2. /2/.
    R. Kieser, N. Kaplan and B.G. Turrell, Phys. Rev. B9(1974)2165.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. /3/.
    R.A. Pax, D.H. Chaplin, H.R. Foster and G.V.H. Wilson, Hyp. Int. 22(1985) 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. /4/.
    R.W. Streater, Ph.D. thesis, Domain Hyperfine Fields in some Diluste Ferromagnetic Alloys studied by NMR on Oriented Nuclei, University of California, Berkeley (1976).Google Scholar
  5. /5/.
    D.H. Chaplin, W.D. Hutchison, M.P. Kopp and N. Yazidjoglou, Hyp. Int. 43(1988) 241. P.J. Back, Hyp. Int. 43(1988) 211.Google Scholar
  6. /6/.
    J. Bunke and H. Bromer, Hyp. Int. 14(1983) 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. /6a/.
    H. Enokiya and M. Kawakami, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 50(1981) 2221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. /7/.
    G.A. Gehring, Physica Scripta, 11(1974) 215.ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. /8/.
    E. Hagn, Hyp. Int. 22(1985) 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. /9/.
    P.J. Back, Ph.D. Thesis, Pulsed and Modulated Passage NMRON Studies of Cobalt Iron Alloys, University of New South Wales (1988).Google Scholar
  11. /10/.
    I. Solomon, Phys. Rev. 110(1958) 61.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. /11/.
    D. Kotzur, M. Mehring, O. Kaneri, Z. Naturforsch. 28a(1973) 1607 and references therein.Google Scholar
  13. /12/.
    D.J. Isbister and D.H. Chaplin, The Influence of the Skin Effect on the Amplitude of Single Pulse Gamma Detected NMRON Signals, Submitted to Z.Naturforsch A.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© J.C. Baltzer A.G., Scientific Publishing Company 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. J. Isbister
    • 1
  • D. H. Chaplin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics, University CollegeThe University of New South Wales, Australian Defence Force AcademyCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations