Skip to main content
Log in

Prosthodontic management of swallowing disorders

  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bosma J: Physiology of the mouth, pharynx, and esophagus. In Paparella M, Shumrick D (eds):Otolaryngology: Vol. 1,Basic Sciences and Related Disciplines. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1973, pp 356–370

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cleall JF: Deglutition: a study of form and function.Am J Orthodont 51:556–594, 1965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dellow P: The general physiological background of chewing and swallowing. In Sessle B, Hannan A (eds):Mastication and Swallowing Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976, pp 6–21

    Google Scholar 

  4. Flowers C, Morris H: Oral-pharyngeal movements during swallowing and speech.Cleft Palate J 10:181–191, 1973

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Logemann J: Anatomy and physiology of normal deglutition. In Logemann J (ed)Evaluation and Treatment of Swallowing Disorders. San Diego: College Hill Press, 1983, pp 9–36

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shedd D, Scatliff J, Kirchner J: The buccopharyngeal propulsive mechanism in human deglutition.Surgery 48:846–853, 1960

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fletcher SG: Processes and maturation of mastication and deglutition.ASHA Reports No. 5, Speech and the Dentofacial Complex: The State of the Art, Proceedings of the Workshop. 1970, pp 92–105

  8. Lowe A: The neural regulation of tongue movement.Prog Neurobiol 15:295–344, 1981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kawamura Y: Recent concepts of the physiology of mastication.Adv Oral Biol 1:77–109, 1964

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dahlberg F: the masticatory effect.J Western Soc Periodont 9:45–54, 1961

    Google Scholar 

  11. Feldman RS, Kapur KK, Alman JE, Chauncey HH: Aging and mastication: changes in performance and in the swallowing threshold with natural dentition.J Am Geriatr Soc 28(3):97–103, 1980

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kapur K, Soman S: Masticatory performance and efficiency in denture wearers.J Prosthet Dent 14:687–494, 1964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wictorin L, Hedegärd B, Lundberg M: Cineradiographic studies of bolus position during chewing.J Prosthet Dent 26:236–246, 1971

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gibbs C, Mahan P, Lundeen H, Brennan K, Walsh E, Holbrook W: Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission.J Prosthet Dent 46:443–449, 1981

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sheppard IM, Sheppard SM: The relationship of vertical dimension to atypical swallowing with complete dentures.J Prosthet Dent 38:249–253, 1977

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jumber JF: Why select overdentures instead of complete dentures. In Jumber JF (ed):An Atlas of Overdentures and Attachments. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co, 1981, pp 17–23

    Google Scholar 

  17. Curtis T, Taylor R, Rositano S: Physical problems in obtaining records of the maxillofacial patient.J Prosthet Dent 34:539–554, 1975

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Beumer J, Curtis TA: Acquired defects of the mandible: etiology, treatment, and rehabilitation. In Beumer J, Curtis TA, Firtell D (eds):Maxillofacial Rehabilitation: Prosthodontic and Surgical Considerations. St Louis: C.V. Mosby, 1979, pp 90–187

    Google Scholar 

  19. Desjardins RP: Occlusal considerations for the partial mandibulectomy patient.J Prosthet Dent 41:308–315, 1979

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Firtell DD, Curtis TA: Removable partial denture design for the mandibular resection patients.J Prosthet Dent 48:438–443, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  21. Robinson J, Rurbright WC: Use of a guide plane for maintaining the residual fragment in partial or hemimandibulectomy.J Prosthet Dent 14:992–999, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chaney S: Denture stability for partial mandibular resection patients.J Prosthet Dent 49:77–79, 1983

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wardill WEM: Cleft palate.Br J Surg 16:127–134, 1928

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dorrance GM: Congenital insufficiency of the palate.Arch Surg 21:185–248, 1930

    Google Scholar 

  25. Warren DW: A physiologic approach to cleft palate prosthesis.J Prosthet Dent 15:770–778, 1965

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Warren DW, Ryan EE: Oral post construction, nasal resistance and respiratory aspects of cleft palate speech: an analog study.Cleft Palate J 4:38–46, 1967

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ashley FL, Sloan RF, Hahn E, Hanafee W, Mithke J: Cinefluorographic study of palatal incompetency cases during deglutition and phonation.Plast Reconstr Surg 28:347–364, 1961

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Griffith BH, Monroe CW, Hill BJ, Waldrop WF, White H: Motion of the lateral pharyngeal wall during velopharyngeal closure.Plast Reconstr Surg 41:338–342, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chierici G, Lawson L: Clinical speech considerations in prosthodontics: perspectives of the prosthodontist and speech pathologist.J Prosthet Dent 29:29–39, 1973

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fletcher SG, Sooudi I, Frost SD: Quantitative and graphic analysis of prosthetic treatment for nasalance in speech.J Prosthet Dent 32:284–291, 1974

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Miyazaki T, Matsuya F, Yamaoka M: Fiberscopic methods for assessment of velopharyngeal closure during various activities.Cleft Palate J 12:107–114, 1975

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pigott RW: The nasendoscopic appearance of the normal palatopharyngeal valve.Plast Reconstr Surg 43:141–147, 1969

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fritzel B: The velopharyngeal muscles in speech.Acta Otolaryngol 250:1–20, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bloomer H: Observations on palatopharyngeal movements in speech and deglutition.J Speech Hearing Disord 13:230–242, 1953

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bzoch KR, Grabner TM, Aoba T: A study of normal velopharyngeal valving for speech.Cleft Palate Bull 9:3–4, 1959

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dickson DK, Grant JC, Sicher H, Dudrul EL, Paltan J: Status of research in cleft palate anatomy and physiology, part 1.Cleft Palate J 11:471–486, 1974

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Harrington R: A study of the mechanism of velopharyngeal closure.J Speech Hearing Disord 9:325–342, 1944

    Google Scholar 

  38. Moll KL: A cinefluorographic study of velopharyngeal function in normals during various activities.Cleft Palate J 2:112–122, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bosma JF, Fletcher SG: The upper pharynx: A review, part II, physiology.Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 71:134–157, 1962

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Shprintzen RJ, Lencione RM, McCall GN, Skolnick ML: A three dimensional cinefluoroscopic analysis of velopharyngeal closure during speech and nonspeech activities in normals.Cleft Palata J 11:412–428, 1974

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Aram A, Subtelny JD: Velopharyngeal function and cleft palate prosthesis.J Prosthet Dent 9:149–158, 1959

    Google Scholar 

  42. McKerns D, Bzoch KR: Variations in velopharyngeal valving: The factor of sex.Cleft Palate J 7:652–662, 1970

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gibbons P, Bloomer H: A supportive-type prosthetic speech aid.J Prosthet Dent 8:362–369, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lang BR: Modification of the palatal lift speech aid.J Prosthet Dent 17:620–626, 1967

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hardy JC, Netsell R, Schweiger JW, Morris HL: Management of velopharyngeal dysfunction in cerebral palsy.J Speech Hearing Disord 34:123–137, 1969

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gonzales JB, Aranson AE: Palatal lift prosthesis for treatment of anatomic and neurologic palatopharyngeal insufficiency.Cleft Palate J 7:91–104, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mazaheri M, Mazaheri EH: Prosthodontic aspects of palatal elevation and palatopharyngeal stimulation.J Prosthet Dent 35:319–326, 1976

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mazaheri M, Millard RT: Changes in resonance related to differences in location and dimension of speech bulbs.Cleft Palate J 2:167–175, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rahn AO, Boucher LJ: In Rahn AO, Boucher LJ (eds):Maxillofacial prosthetics. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rosen MS, Bzoch KR: The prosthetic speech appliance in rehabilitation of patients with cleft palate.J Am Dent Assoc 57:203–210, 1958

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kelsey CA, Ewanowski SJ, Crummy AB, Bless DM: Lateral pharyngeal wall motion as a predictor of surgical success in velopharyngeal insufficiency.N Eng J Med 287:64–68, 1972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Blakeley W: The complementary use of speech prostheses and pharyngeal flaps in palatal insufficiency.Cleft Palate J 1:194–198, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hagerty RF, Hess DA, Mylin WK: Velar motility, velopharyngeal closure and speech proficiency in cartilage pharyngoplasty: the effect of age at surgery.Cleft Palate J 5:317–326, 1968

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Weiss CE: Success of an obturator reduction program.Cleft Palate J 8:291–297, 1971

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wong LP, Weiss CE: A clinical assessment of obturator-wearing cleft palate patients.J Prosthet Dent 27:632–639, 1972

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Shelton RL, Lindquist AF, Arndt WB, Elbert M, Youngstrom KA: Effect of speech bulb reduction on movement of the posterior wall of the pharynx and posture of the tongue.Cleft Palate J 8:10–17, 1971

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Shelton RL, Chisum L, Youngstrom KA, Arndt WB, Elbert M: Effect of articulation therapy on palatopharyngeal closure, movement of the pharyngeal wall and tongue posture.Cleft Palate J 6:440–448, 1969

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Schalit A: Obturator of choice for congenital cleft palate.Am J Orthodont 32:688–713, 1946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sharry J: Meatus obturator in particular and pharyngeal impressions in general.J Prosthet Dent 8:893–896, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  60. Taylor TD, Desjardins RP: Construction of the meatus type obturator: its advantages and disadvantages.J Prosthet Dent 49:80–84, 1983

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Shelton RL, Bosma JF, Sheets BV: Tongue, hyoid and larynx displacement in swallow and phonation.J Appl Physiol 15:283–288, 1960

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kawasaki M, Ogura JH: Interdependence of deglutition with respiration.Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 77:906–913, 1968

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Ramsey G, Watson J, Bramisk R, Weinberg S: Cinefluoroscopic analysis of the mechanism of swallowing.Radiology 64:498–518, 1955

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Ardran GM, Kemp FH: Radiographic study of movements of the tongue in swallowing.Br Soc Study Orthodont 30:119–128, 1954

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kydd WL, Toda JM: Tongue pressures exerted on the hard palate during swallowing.J Am Dent Assoc 65:321–330, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  66. Proffit WR, Norton LA: The tongue and oral morphology: influences of tongue activity during speech and swallowing.ASHA Reports No 5, Speech and the Dentofacial Complex: The State of the Art, Proceedings of the Workshop, 1970, pp 106–115

  67. Logemann J, Bytell D: Swallowing disorders in three types of head and neck surgical patients.Cancer 44:1075–1105, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  68. Logemann J, Sisson G, Wheeler R: The Team Approach to Rehabilitation of Surgically Treated Oral Cancer Patients. Williamsburg, VA, Proceedings of the National Forum on Cancer Rehabilitation, 1980

  69. Shedd D, Kirchner J, Scatliff J: Oral and pharyngeal components of deglutition.Arch Surg 82:371–380, 1961

    Google Scholar 

  70. Lauciello FR, Vergo T, Schaaf NG, Zimmerman R: Prosthodontic and speech rehabilitation after partial and complete glossectomy.J Prosthet Dent 43:204–211, 1980

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Aramany MA, Downs JA, Beery QC, Aslan Y: Prosthodontic rehabilitation for glossectomy patients.J Prosthet Dent 48:78–81, 1982

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. de Souza LJ, Martins OJ: Swallowing and speech after radical total glossectomy with tongue prosthesis.Oral Surg 39(3):356–360, 1975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Moore DJ: Glossectomy rehabilitation by mandibular tongue prosthesis.J Prosthet Dent 25:429–433, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  74. Cantor R, Curtis TA, Shipp T, Bermer J, Yogel BS: Maxillary speech prosthesis for mandibular surgical defects.J Prosthet Dent 22:253–260, 1969

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Leonard R, Gillis R: Effects of a prosthetic tongue on vowel intelligibility and food management in a patient with total glossectomy.J Speech Hearing Disord 47:25–30, 1982

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Wheeler RL, Logemann JA, Rosen MS: Maxillary reshaping prostheses: effectiveness in improving speech and swallowing of postsurgical oral cancer patients.J Prosthet Dent 43:313–319, 1980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis, J.W. Prosthodontic management of swallowing disorders. Dysphagia 3, 199–205 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02407224

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02407224

Keywords

Navigation