Skip to main content
Log in

Testing for abnormal security-price performance under conditions of event-period uncertainty

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines an event study test procedure based on cumulative average residuals (CARs) and a boundary-crossing probability for Brownian motion. The boundary-crossing test procedure is designed to detect abnormal security-price performance under conditions of event-period uncertainty. Simulations with daily security-return data show that the boundary-crossing test is well specified under the null hypothesis and has good power properties under the alternative hypothesis of abnormal security-price performance distributed over an event period of uncertain length.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkins, Allen B. and Edward A. Dyl, “Price Reversals, Bid-Ask Spreads and Market Efficiency.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 25, 535–547, (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, Clifford A. and Walter N. Torous, “Investigating Security-Price Performance in the Presence of Event-Date Uncertainty.”Journal of Financial Economics 22, 123–153, (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehmer, Ekkehart, Jim Musumeci and Annette B. Poulsen, “Event-Study Methodology Under Conditions of Event-Induced Variance.”Journal of Financial Economics 30, 253–272, (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, Marc and Richard J. Sweeney, “The Reversal of Large Stock-Price Decreases.”Journal of Finance 46, 747–754, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.L., J. Durbin and J.M. Evans, “Techniques for Testing the Constancy of Regression Relationships Over Time.”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (SeriesB) 37, 149–163, (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Keith C., William van Harlow and Seha M. Tinic, “Risk Aversion, Uncertain Information, and Market Efficiency.”Journal of Financial Economics 22, 355–385, (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Stephen J. and Jerold B. Warner, “Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies.”Journal of Financial Economics 14, 3–31, (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Stephen J. and Mark I. Weinstein, “Derived Factors in Event Studies.”Journal of Financial Economics 14, 491–495, (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Daniel W. and Warren T. Dent, “A Comparison of Alternative Methodologies used in capital markets research.”Journal of Accounting Research 22, 48–84, (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrado, Charles J. “A Nonparametric Test for Abnormal Security-Price Performance in Event Studies.”Journal of Financial Economics 23, 385–395, (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrado, Charles J. and Terry L. Zivney, “The Specification and Power of the Sign Test in Event Study Hypothesis Tests Using Daily Stock Returns.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 27, 465–478, (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimson, Elroy and Paul Marsh, “Event Studies and the Size Effect: The Case of UK Press Recommendations.”Journal of Financial Economics 17, 113–142, (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyckman, Thomas, Donna Philbrick and Jens Stephan, “A Comparison of Event Study Methodologies Using Daily Stock Returns: A Simulation Approach.”Journal of Accounting Research 22, 1–30, (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, Eugene F., Lawrence Fisher, Michael C. Jensen and Richard Roll, “The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information.”International Economic Review 10, 1–21, (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinkel, Robert and Alan Kraus, “Measuring Event Impacts in Thinly Traded Stocks.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 23, 71–88, (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karatzas, Ioannis and Steven E. Shreve,Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, April and James Rosenfeld, “The Influence of Market Conditions on Event Study Residuals.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22, 345–351, (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Eric L.,Testing Statistical Hypotheses. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malatesta, Paul, “Measuring Abnormal Performance: The Event Parameter Approach Using Generalized Least Squares.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 21, 227–238, (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Malatesta, Paul and Rex Thompson, “Partially Anticipated Events: A Model of Stock Price Reaction with an Application to Corporate Acquisitions.”Journal of Financial Economics 14, 237–250, (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, Bill, “Event Studies and Systems Methods: Some Additional Evidence.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22, 495–504, (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelson, Wayne H. and Megan Partch, “Withdrawn Security Offerings.”Journal of Financial and Quantitive Analysis 23, 119–133, (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. Radhakrishna,Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications. New York: Wiley, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, Jay R., “The Long-Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings.”Journal of Finance 46, 3–27, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, Herbert and David Siegmund, “Boundary Crossing Probabilities for the Wiener Process and Sample Sums.”Annals of Mathematical Statistics 41, 1410–1429, (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohatgi, Vijay K.,Statistical Inference. New York: Wiley, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, Ralph W., Jr. and Russell P. Robins, “Discriminating Between Wealth and Information Effects in Event Studies in Accounting and Finance Research.”Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 1, 307–329, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sefcik, S. and Rex Thompson, “An Approach to Statistical Inference in Cross-Sectional Models with Security Abnormal Returns as the Dependent Variable.”Journal of Accounting Research 24, 316–334, (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Serfling, Robert J.,Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics. New York: Wiley, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, Murray R.,Mathematical Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Rex, “Conditioning the Return Generating Process on Firm Specific Events: A Discussion of Event Study Methods.”Journal of Financial and Quantiative Analysis 20, 151–164, (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corrado, C.J. Testing for abnormal security-price performance under conditions of event-period uncertainty. Rev Quant Finan Acc 3, 127–148 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02407002

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02407002

Key words

Navigation