Advertisement

Hydrotechnical Construction

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 331–336 | Cite as

Present trends in protection of hydraulic turbines against cavitation pitting

  • Yu. U. Édel'
Papers
  • 50 Downloads

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    The most important a pproach for increasing the wear resistance of hydraulic turbines against cavitation is the development of hydrodynamic means for controlling the cavitation and reducing its pitting capacity. Of great significance is the development of cavitation-resistant materials and coatings and of techniques for applying them. The electrochemical means for protection against cavitation have not yet been sufficiently developed for extensive use. It is convenient to organize laboratory investigations on cathodic protection and methodical testing of this type of protection in one or two small turbines.

     
  2. 2.

    An important method of preventing cavitation pitting is the proper selection of the operating regimens. At the present time, methods have been worked out for predicting the intensity of cavitation action under different operating regimens of the turbines, on the basis of analytical data about the pressure distribution. The relative pitting hazard can be tentatively evaluated from the intensity of recorded acoustic radiations.

     

Keywords

Energy Source Cavitation Wear Resistance Power Generation Pressure Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    V. N. Khovko, “Cavitation erosion of turbines in the Lower Dnieper hydroelectric stations,” Gidrotekh. Stroitel'., No. 6 (1969).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. L. Milichenko, Repair of Cavitation Damage of Hydraulic Turbines [in Russian], Énergiya, Moscow (1971).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu. U. Édel', “Methods of cavitation investigations in hydraulic turbines,” Trudy TsKTI, No. 106 (1971).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. I. Busyrev and V. G. Staritskii, “Investigation of cavitation pitting on models of Francis turbines,” Énergomashinostroenie, No. 3 (1970).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. É. Volin and É. D. Lunatsi, “Quick determination of the characteristics of hydraulic machines with the help of low-strength varnish coatings,” Trudy VNIIGidromash, No. 37 (1968).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yu. A. Grivnin and Yu. U. Édel', “Cavitation pitting in hydraulic turbines,” Énergomashinostroenie, No. 1 (1970).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. K. Barkov and N. M. Kuzevanov, “Effect of admission of air on cavitation wear of Francis runners,” Élektricheskie Stantsii, No. 3 (1968).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. U. Édel'

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations