Skip to main content
Log in

Explaining the demand for producer services: Is cost-driven externalization the major factor?

  • Published:
Papers in Regional Science

Abstract

Producer services employment has grown rapidly within advanced economies in recent years. The bases of demand related to this growth are not well understood by regional scientists. A common view is that this growth is largely attributable to cost-driven factors and vertical disintegration processes on the part of producer service users. This paper demonstrates that cost-driven externalization is not the most important force underlying growth in demand for producer services. The need for specialized knowledge is by far the most important factor behind producer services demand, combined with a variety of other cost, quasi-cost, and non-cost-driven forces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beyers, W. 1989.The producer services and economic development in the United States: The Last Decade. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Economic Development Administration, Technical Assistance and Research Division.

  • Beyers, W. 1992. Producer services and metropolitan growth and development. InSources of Metropolitan Growth, eds. E.S. Mills and J.F. McDonald, pp. 125–146. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyers, W. 1994. Producer services in urban and rural Areas: contrasts in competitiveness, trade, and development. A paper given at the North American Regional Science Meetings, Niagara Falls, Ontario, November 1994.

  • Beyers, W. and Lindahl, D. 1997. Strategic behaviour and development sequences in producer service business.Environment and Planning A, 29, forthcoming.

  • Bryson, J., Keeble, D., and Wood, P. 1992.Business networks, flexibility and regional development in UK business services. Small Business Research Centre, University of Cambridge. Working Paper 19.

  • Bryson, J., Wood, P., and Keeble, D. 1993. The creation and growth of small business service firms in post-industrial Britain. Small Business Research Centre, University of Cambridge. Working Paper No. 26.

  • Christopherson, S. and Noyelle, T. 1992. The U.S. path toward flexibility and productivity: the remaking of the U.S. labour market in the 1980's. InRegional Development and Contemporary Industrial Response, eds. H. Ernste and V. Meier, pp. 163–178. London: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, W. 1992. The role of producer services in systems of flexible production. InRegional Development and Contemporary Industrial Response, eds. H. Ernste and V. Meier, pp. 133–146. London: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, W. 1995. Forward and backward linkages of producer service establishments: evidence from the Montreal metropolitan area. A paper presented at the Association of American Geographers Meetings, Chicago, Illinois, March 1995.

  • Coffey, W. and Bailly, A. 1991. Producer services and flexible production: an exploratory analysis.Growth and Change 22: 95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, W. and Bailly, A. 1992. Producer services and systems of flexible productionUrban Studies 29: 857–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, W., Drolet, R., and Polèse, M. 1994. Make or Buy?: Internalization and externalization of producer service inputs in the Montreal metropolitan area. A paper prepared for the North American Meetings of the Regional Science Association International, Niagara Falls, Ontario, November 1994.

  • Daniels, P. 1985.Service industries, a geographical appraisal. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goe, W. 1990. Producer services, trade and social division of labor.Regional Studies 24: 327–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goe, W. 1991. The growth of producer services industries: sorting through the externalization debate.Growth and Change 22: 118–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, N. 1991. Factories in Danish fields: how high-wage, flexible production has succeeded in peripheral Jutland.International Regional Science Review. 14: 109–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, B. 1994.Lean and mean, the changing landscape of corporate power in the age of flexibility. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, C. 1987. Leaning from Italy's industrial renaissance.The Entrepreneurial Economy 1: 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, D. 1994. Market differentiation and competitiveness in the producer services: can local firms compete with large multi-establishment firms. A paper given at the North American Regional Science Meetings, Niagara Falls, Ontario, November 1994.

  • Kutscher, R. 1988. Growth of services employment in the United States InTechnology In Services: Policies For Growth, Trade, And Employment, eds. G. R. Guile and J.B. Quinn, pp. 47–75. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli, F. 1991. A demand orientated approach to understanding producer services. InThe Changing Geography Of Advanced Producer Services, (eds.) P. Daniels and F. Moulaert, pp. 15–29. London: Bellhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Farrell, P. 1993. The performance of business-service firms in peripheral regions: an international comparison between Scotland and Nova Scotia.Environment and Planning A, 25: 1627–1648.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Farrell, P., Hitchens, D. and Moffat, L. 1992. The competitiveness of business service firms: A matched comparison between Scotland and the South East of England.Regional Studies, 26: 519–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Farrell, P., Hitchens, D. and Moffat, L. 1993. The competitive advantage of business service firms: a matched pairs analysis of the relationship between generic strategy and performance.Service Industries Journal. 13: 40–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Farrell P., Moffat, L. and Hitchens, D. 1993. Manufacturing demand for business services in a core and peripheral region: Does flexible production imply vertical disintegration of business services.Regional Studies 27: 385–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, M. 1990. Business service specialization and regional economic change.Regional Studies, 24: 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, M. 1992. Flexible production, externalization and the interpretation of business service growth.The service industries journal 12: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. 1990.The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. 1992.Intelligent enterprise. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. 1988.Metropolis. from the division of labor to urban form. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tordoir, P. 1994. Transactions of professional business services and spatial systems.Tijdscrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 85:322–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschetter, J. 1987 Producer services industries: why are they growing so rapidly.Monthly Labor Review. 110: 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P. 1993 Regional patterns of business service externalisation in the uk: an expert labour approach. Paper presented at the International RESER Conference, Siracusa Sicily, Sept. 1993.

  • Wood, P., Bryson, J., Rotheram, D. 1994 Consultant Use and the Management of Change: Insights into Expertise. Paper presented at the International RESER Conference, Barcelona, Sept. 1994.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beyers, W.B., Lindahl, D.P. Explaining the demand for producer services: Is cost-driven externalization the major factor?. Papers in Regional Science 75, 351–374 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02406758

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02406758

Keywords

Navigation