Advertisement

Calcified Tissue International

, Volume 36, Supplement 1, pp S62–S66 | Cite as

Circadian rhythm of mechanically mediated differentiation of osteoblasts

  • W. Eugene Roberts
  • Elaine Klingler
  • Peter G. Mozsary
Article

Summary

Rats entrained to alternating 12 h light/dark periods were sacrificed at hourly intervals over one complete circadian cycle. Each animal was injected with3H-Thymidine 1 h before death. Autoradiographs of serial sections of maxillary first molar periodontal ligament (PDL) were prepared. Nuclear volume was determined for labeled fibroblastlike PDL cells along a physiological bone forming surface. Preosteoblasts (large nuclei), the immediate proliferating precursors of osteoblasts, were found to synthesize DNA primarily during the environmental light period and divide during the subsequent dark cycle. Less differentiated precursor cells (small nuclei), the proliferating predecessors of preosteoblasts, were in S phase primarily during the dark period and divided in the following light cycle. Since previous studies have indicated, the stress/strain-mediated increase in nuclear size to form preosteoblasts also requires about 8–12 h, the least complex osteoblast differentiation model, which is consistent with the present data, is a 60 h sequence involving at least four cell types and five alternating dark/light cycles. The principal rate-limiting step in osteoblast differentiation is the mechanically related shift in nuclear size (change in genomic expression) associated with formation of preosteoblasts.

Key words

Osteoblast differentiation Circadian rhythm Mechanical stress Bone formation Periodontium 

References

  1. 1.
    Roberts WE, Mozsary PG, Klinger E (1983) Nuclear size as a cell-kinetic marker for osteoblast differentiation. Am J Anat 165:373–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roberts WE, Chase DC, Jee WSS (1974) Counts of labeled mitoses in the orthodontically-stimulated periodontal ligament in the rat. Arch Oral Biol 19:665–670CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roberts WE, Chase DC (1981) Kinetics of cell proliferation and migration associated with orthodontically-induced osteogenesis. J Dent Res 60:174–181PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith RK, Roberts WE (1980) Cell kinetics of the initial response to orthodontically induced osteogenesis in rat molar periodontal ligament. Calcif Tissue Int 30:51–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yee JA, Kimmel DB, Jee WSS (1976) Periodontal ligament cell kinetics following orthodontic tooth movement. Cell Tissue Kinet 9:293–302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roberts EW (1975) Cell kinetic nature and diurnal periodicity of the rat periodontal ligament. Arch Oral Biol 20:465–471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kimmel DB, Jee WSS (1975) A rapid plastic embedding technique for preparation of three-micron thick sections of decalcified hard tissue. Stain Technol 50:83–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wolff CM (1978) Principles of biometry. van Nostrand Company, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roberts WE, Aubert MM, Sparaga JM, Smith RK (1979) Circadean periodicity of the cell kinetics of rat molar periodontal ligament. Am J Orthod 76:316–323CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Eugene Roberts
    • 1
  • Elaine Klingler
    • 3
  • Peter G. Mozsary
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of OrthodonticsSchool of DentistrySan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Oral SurgerySchool of DentistrySan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.University of Paris VParisFrance

Personalised recommendations