Skip to main content
Log in

Using a group support system to implement Evolutionary Systems Design

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evolutionary Systems Design (ESD) is a modeling framework for such task-oriented group processes as group decision making, planning, policy making, and negotiation. To support these processes, a meeting script based on ESD is developed for MeetingWorkds, a general purpose group support system (GSS).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • DelbecqA., A.Van deVen and D.Gustafson. (1975).Group Techniques for Program Planning. Glenview, IL: Scott-Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • DennisA., and B.Gallupe. (1993). “A History of Group Support Systems Empirical Research: Lessons Learned and Future Directions.” In L.Jessup and J.Valacich (eds.),Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A., G. Hayes, and R. Daniels. (1994). “Re-engineering Business Process Modeling.” InProceedings of the 27th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, Vol. 4, pp. 244–253.

  • Dennis, A., C. Tyron, D. Vogel, and J. Nunamaker. (1990). “An Evaluation of Information Technology to Support Strategic Management.” InProceedings of the Eleventh International Conference of Information Systems, pp. 35–52.

  • DienerE. (1980) “De-individuation: The Absence of Self-awareness and Self-regulation in Group Members.” In P.Paulus (ed.),Psychology of Group Influence, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • GallupeB., L.Basianutti, and W.Cooper. (1991). “Unblocking Brainstorms,”Journal of Applied Psychology 76(1), 137–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, R., L. F. Lewis, and K. Keleman. (1994). “Building a Business Around Group Support Technology.” InProceedings of the Twenty-seventh Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, January.

  • Huber, G. (1984). “Issues in the Design of Group Decision Support Systems,”MIS Quarterly (30), 195–204.

  • JanisI. (1981).Group Think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • JessupL., and D.Tansik. (1991). “Decision Making in an Automated Environment: The Effects of Anonymity and Proximity on Group Process and Outcome with a Group Decision Support System,”Decision Sciences 22(1), 266–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keleman K., L. F. Lewis, and J. Garcia. (1993). “Script Management: A Link between Group Support Systems and Organizational Learning,”Small Group Research 24 (4).

  • LewisL. F. (1993). “Decision-aiding Software for Group Decisionmaking.” In S.Nagel (ed.),Decision-Aiding Software and Decision Analysis: Theory and Applications. Editor. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, L. F. (1988). “Issues in Group Decision Support System (GDSS) Design,”Journal of Information Science 14.

  • Lewis, L. F. (1987). “A Decision Support System for Face-to-face Groups,”Journal of Information Science 13.

  • Lewis, L. F., and K. Keleman. (1990). “Experiences with GDSS development: Lab and Field Studies,”Journal of Information Science 16(2) (April).

  • Lewis, L. F., and A. Whiteley. (1992). “Initial Perceptions of Professional Facilitators Regarding GDSS Impacts: A Study Using the Grounded-Theory Approach.” InProceedings of the Twenty-fifth Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, January.

  • MaslowA. (1954).Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • NanamakerJ. et al. (1991). “Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work,”Communications of the ACM 34(7), 40–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RokeachM. (1973).The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ShakunM. (1988).Evolutionary Systems Design: Policy Making Under Complexity and Group Decision Support Systems. Oakland, CA: Holden-Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • ShakunM. (1990). “Group Decision and Negotiation Support in Evolving, Non-shared Information Contexts,”Theory and Decision 28(3), 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ShakunM. (1991). “Airline Buyout: Evolutionary Systems Design and Problem Restructuring in Group Decision and Negotiation,”Management Science 37(10), 1291–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ShakunM. (1992). “Defining a Right Problem in Group Decision and Negotiation: Feeling and Evolutionary Generating Procedures,”Group Decision and Negotiation, 1(1), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ShakunM. (1993). “Problem Evolution and Solution in Negotiation Support Systems,” InProceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakun, M. (1995). “Modeling and Supporting Task-Oriented Group Processes: Purposeful Complex Adaptive Systems and Evolutionary Systems Design,”Group Decision and Negotiation 5(4–6).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, L.F., Shakun, M.F. Using a group support system to implement Evolutionary Systems Design. Group Decis Negot 5, 319–337 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404638

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404638

Key words

Navigation