Computers and the Humanities

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 15–36 | Cite as

Prolegomena to pictorial concordances

  • H. Van Dyke Parunak
Article
  • 17 Downloads

Keywords

Computational Linguistic 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. [1]
    One unpublished bibliography of studies of this genre, restricted to the canonical books of the Old and New Testaments, contains over three hundred entries and continues to grow rapidly.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Rhetoric iii.9, translation of W. Rhys Roberts.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    John L. Myres (1953).Herodotus: Father of History (Clarendon Press, Oxford) 89–134. In fairness to Aristotle, we should note that his immediate concern in contrasting the periodic and free-running styles was with periods short enough to be delivered orally in a single breath. But his definition of the free-running style is not restricted to oral presentations, as his reference to Herodotus shows.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Some preliminary attempts to synthesize such grammars for biblical material include S. Bar-Efrat (1980). Some observations on the analysis of structure in biblical narratives,Vetus Testamentum 30, 154–173; E. Galibiati (1956).La Struttura Letteraria dell'Esodo (Scrinium Theologicum III, Edizioni Paoline, Rome) 16–51; W.L. Holladay (1966). The recovery of poetic passages of Jeremiah,J. Biblical Literature 85, 401–435, especially “Theoretical Framework”, 406–412; N.W. Lund (1942).Chiasmus in the New Testament (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill), especially his “seven laws” on pages 40–47; H. Van Dyke Parunak (1979).Structural Studies in Ezekiel (University Microfilms, Ann Arbor) 58–108.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    H. Van Dyke Parunak, Oral typesetting: Some uses of biblical structure,Biblica, in press.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    G. Lisowsky (1957)Konkordanz zum Hebräischen Alten Testament (2te Auflage; Würtembergische Bibelanstalt, Stuttgart) 1358–1360.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Depending on the number and distribution of occurrences of the target word for each plot, these tables often do not fit on the same physical output page as the graphical display. For illustrative purposes, we have reproduced only the first page of each of our plots in this study. Thus, except in the plot for “righteous”, only a portion of the tables appears in the figures.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    That is, only 5% or less of the clusters observed on a comparable randomly generated plot would be as narrow as the cluster under discussion, and only 5% or less of the gaps would be as wide as the gap under discussion.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    J.B. Smith (1978), Computer criticism,Style 12 (4) 338–339.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    1976. Style and authorship,The Tyndale Paper 21 (2) 25–31.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Personal correspondence, 30 May 1979.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    S. Johnson (1967), Hierarchical clustering schemes,Psychometrika 32, 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    F. Mosteller, and R.E. Rourke (1973),Sturdy Statistics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) p. 243.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    F. Mosteller, and R.E. Rourke, pp. 26–27.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    F. Mosteller, and R.E. Rourke, pp. 242.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    H. Van Dyke Parunak (1979),Linguistic Density Plots in Zechariah (The Computer Bible 20) (Biblical Research Associates, Wooster).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    H. Van Dyke Parunak,Linguistic Density Plots in Ezekiel (The Computer Bible) (Biblical Research Associates, Wooster), forthcoming.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© North-Holland Publishing Company 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Van Dyke Parunak
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations