Computers and the Humanities

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 37–45 | Cite as

Computer applications in cultural anthropology

  • Michael L. Burton
Article

Summary

This paper covers important developments in the use of computers for quantitative research in cultural anthropology, particularly in areas which (unlike statistics) are uniquely anthropological. These fall into statistical topics and topics in scaling and measurement. By far the largest single usage of computers by cultural anthropologists is for statistical summaries of field data and for simple statistical tests such as thechi-squared for the analysis of field data or for cross-cultural studies. As the discipline develops this situation will remain the same. In fact, the proportion of people who use the computer primarily for contingency tables, frequency counts, and correlation analysis may very well increase, since there are many potential users who would fall in this category and only a few potential users who would perform other operations such as multi-dimensional scaling or simulation. The few other computer techniques that would be relevant to anthropology, and for which the technology already exists, include linear regression, as practiced by economists, and linear programming (also practiced by economists), both of which could be extremely useful in the study of peasant economy. Careful research with such models could dispel some of the controversy which has been hindering the development of economic anthropology for the last fifteen years. The training of anthropologists who can understand the relevance of such models to their work may be far in the future, since the majority of them are still skeptical of most formal methods and of the computers which make them work.

Keywords

Field Data Statistical Summary Contingency Table Formal Method Careful Research 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burton, Michael L.Multidimensional Scaling of Role Terms. Stanford University Ph.D. dissertation, 1968. Ann Arbor, University Microfilms No. 69-8160.Google Scholar
  2. … “Semantic Dimensions of Occupation Terms.” In A. K. Romney, Roger Shepard, and S. B. Nerlove, eds.Multidimensional Scaling in the Behavioral Sciences. In press.Google Scholar
  3. Colby, Benjamin N. “The Analysis of Culture Content and the Patterning of Narrative Concern in Texts.”American Anthropologist 68, i(1966): 473–88.Google Scholar
  4. Coult, Allan D. and Richard R. Randolph. “Computer Methods for Analyzing Genealogical Space.”American Anthropologist 67(1965):21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cowgill, George. “Computer Applications in Archeology.”AFIPS Conference Proceedings, vol. 31. Washington, D.C.: Thompson Book Co., 1967.Google Scholar
  6. D'Andrade, Roy G., N. R. Quinn, S. B. Nerlove, and A. K. Romney. “Categories of Disease in American-English and Mexican-Spanish.” In A. K. Romney, Roger Shepard, and S. B. Nerlove, eds.Multidimensional Scaling in the Behavioral Sciences. In press.Google Scholar
  7. Driver, Harold and Karl F. Schuessler “Correlational Analyses of Murdock's 1957 Ethnographic Sample.American Anthropologist 69(1967):332–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilbert, John P. and E. A. Hammel “Computer Simulation and Analysis of Problems in Kinship and Social Structure.”American Anthropologist 68:71–94.Google Scholar
  9. Goodenough, Ward H. “Rethinking ‘Status’ and ‘Role’: Toward a General Model of the Cultural Organization of Social Relationships.” In M. Banton, ed.The Relevance of Models in Social Anthropology. London: Tavistock Publications, 1965.Google Scholar
  10. Gouldner, Alan W. and Richard A. Peterson.Notes on Technology and the Moral Order. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1962.Google Scholar
  11. Harding, Joe R. “Multidimensional Scaling of Ixil Role Terms.” Paper presented at meetings of the American Anthropological Association, New Orleans, 1969.Google Scholar
  12. Hymes, Dell. “The Uses of Computers in Anthropology.” The Hague: Mouton and Co., 1965.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, S. C. “Hierarchical Clustering Schemes.”Psychometrika 32(1967):241–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kay, Paul. “A Guttman Scale Model of Tahitian Consumer Behavior.”Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 20,ii(1964): 160–67.Google Scholar
  15. Kreps, Theodora. “Computer Analysis of Uto-Aztecan Kinship Systems.” Stanford University Ph.D. dissertation, 1964.Google Scholar
  16. Kronenfeld, David. “Computer Analysis of Lineal Kinship Systems.” M.S., Stanford University, Department of Anthropology, 1967.Google Scholar
  17. Kruskal, J. B. “Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness of Fit to a Nometric Hypothesis.”Psychometrika 29(1964):1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Osgood, C. E., G. J. Suci, and P. H. Tannenbaum. “The Measurement of Meaning.” Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  19. Randolph, Richard R. and Allan D. Coult. “A Computer Analysis of Bedouin Marriage.”Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 24,i(1968):83–99.Google Scholar
  20. Romney, A. K. and Roy G. D'Andrade. “Cognitive Aspects of English Kin Terms.”American Anthropologist 66,iii,part 2(1964):146–70.Google Scholar
  21. ——. “A Model for the Analysis of Endogamy.” In Paul Kay, ed.Explorations in Mathematical Anthropology. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  22. —, and Ken Wexler. “Individual Variations in Cognitive Structures.” In A. K. Romney, Roger Shepard, and S. B. Nerlove, eds.Multidimensional Scaling in the Behavioral Sciences. In press.Google Scholar
  23. Sawyer, Jack and Robert E. Levine “Cultural Dimensions: A Factor Analysis of the World Ethnographic Sample.”American Anthropologist 68(1966): 708–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shepard, Roger N. “The Analysis of Proximities: Multidimensional Scaling with an Unknown Distance Function.”Psychometrika 27(1962):125–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. —— “Metric Structures in Ordinal Data.”Journal of Mathematical Psychology 3(1966):287–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Siegel, Sydney.Non-Parametric Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1958.Google Scholar
  27. Steffire, Volney. “Some Applications of Multidimensional Scaling to Social Science Problems.” In A. K. Romney, Roger Shepard, and S. B. Nerlove, eds.Multidimensional Scaling in the Behavioral Sciences. In press.Google Scholar
  28. Textor, R. B.A Cross-Cultural Summary. New Haven: Human Relations Area Files Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Queens College of the City University of New York 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael L. Burton
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaIrvine

Personalised recommendations