Skip to main content
Log in

Advances in computation, statistical methods, and testing of discrete choice models

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper gives a brief overview of recent developments in computation, estimation, and statistical testing of choice models, with marketing applications. Topics include statistical models for discrete panel data with heterogeneous decision-makers, simulation methods for estimation of high-dimension multinomial probit models, specification tests for model structure and for brand and purchase clustering, and innovations in numerical analysis for estimation and forecasting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ai, Chunrong. (1990). “Semiparametric MLE for Generalized Regression Models,” Ph.D. Thesis, MIT.

  • Ben-AkivaM., D.McFadden, K.Train. (1987). “The Demand for Local Telephone Service”,Rand Journal 18, 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, M., and D. Bolduc. (1989). “Multinomial Probit with Taste Variation and Autoregressive Alternatives,” M.I.T. Working Paper.

  • Berkovec, J., and S. Stern. (1988). “Job Exit Behavior of Older Men,” U. Of Virginia Working Paper.

  • Bolduc, D. (1990). “Autoregressive Alternatives in the Multinomial Probit Model,” Laval Univ. Working Paper.

  • Bunch, D. (1989). “Multinomial Probit Model Estimation Revisited: Testing of New Algorithms and Evaluation of Alternative Model Specifications for Trinomial Models of Household Car Ownership,” Working Paper, Transportation Research Group, U.C. Davis.

  • Bunch, D. (1989). “Estimability of the Multinomial Probit Model,” Working Paper, Transportation Research Group, U.C. Davis.

  • Chamberlain, G. (1990). “Efficiency Bounds for Semiparametric Regression,” Harvard Univ. Working Paper.

  • Cosslett, S. (1989). “Probabilistic Choice Over a Continuous Range: An Econometric Model Based on Extreme-Value Stochastic Processes,” Department of Economics Working Paper, Ohio State University.

  • CosslettS. (1987). “Efficiency Bounds for Distribution-Free Estimates of The Binary Choice and Censored Regression Models”,Econometrica 55, 559–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • DaganzoC. (1980).Multinomial Probit, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DagsvikJ. (1990). “Discrete and Continuous Choice, Max-Stable Processes, and Independence from Irrelevant Alternatives”, Working Paper, Central Bureau of Statistics, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • DubinJ. (1985).Consumer Durable Choice and the Demand for Electricity, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, J. and D. McFadden (1984). “Econometric Analysis of Residential Electric Appliance Holdings and Consumption,”Econometrica 52.

  • Everitt, B. (1984).Latent Variable Models, Chapman and Hall.

  • GoldbergerA. (1972). “Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences”,Econometrica 40, 979–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourieroux, C., A. Monfort, E. Renault, and A. Trogon. (1985). “Simulated Residuals,” CEPREMAP Working Paper.

  • Hajivassiliou, V., and D. McFadden. (1987). “The Method of Simulated Scores for the Estimation of LDV Models with An Application to External Debt Crises,” Yale Univ. Working Paper.

  • Hajivassiliou, V., D. McFadden, and P. Ruud. (1990). “Simulation of Multivariate Normal Orthant Probabilities: Methods and Programs,” MIT Working Paper.

  • HausmanJ., and D.Wise. (1978). “A conditional probit model for qualitative choice: discrete decisions recognizing interdependence and heterogeneous preferences”, Econometrica 46, 403–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • HorowitzJ., J.Sparmonn, and C.Daganzo. (1981). “An investigation of the accuracy of the Clark approximation for the multinomial probit model”, Transportation Science 16, 382–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichimura, H. (1987). “Estimation of Single Index Models”, PhD Dissertation, MIT.

  • JöreskogK. and D.Sörbom. (1979).Advances in Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Models, Cambridge: Abt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, M. (1990). “A Computationally Efficient Algorithm for Method of Simulated Moments Estimation in the Panel Data Case,” Univ. of Minnesota Working Paper.

  • Kridel, D. (1989). “A Consumer Surplus Approach to Predicting Extended Area Service Development and Stimulation Rates,”Information Economics and Policy.

  • Lawley, D., and A. Maxwell. (1971).Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method, Butterworths.

  • Lumsdaine, R., J. Stock, and D. Wise. (1990). “Three Models of Retirement: Computational Complexity vs. Predictive Validity,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper.

  • ManskiC. (1978). “Maximum Score Estimation of the Stochastic Utility Model of Choice”,Journal of Econometrics 3, 205–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1990). “Hypothesis Testing in a GMM Setting,” MIT Working Paper.

  • McFadden, D. (1981). “Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice”, in C.Manski and D.McFadden (eds)Structural Analysis of Discrete Data, Cambridge: MIT Press, 198–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFaddenD. (1984). “Econometric analysis of qualitative response models”, in Z.Griliches and M.Intriligator (ed)Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 2, Amsterdam: North Holland, 1395–1457.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFaddenD. (1986a). “The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research”,Marketing Science 5, 275–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1986b). “Discrete response to unobserved variables for which there are multiple indicators,” MIT Working Paper.

  • McFadden, D. (1987). “Regression-Based Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model,” Journal of Econometrics.

  • McFaddenD. (1989). “A Method of Simulated Moments for Estimation of Discrete Response Models without Numerical Integration”,Econometrica 57, 995–1026.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFaddenD., and K.Train. (1990). “Learning by Doing Learning by Observing, and the Demand for Priority Service”, Univ. of California Berkeley Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D., and P. Ruud. (1990). “Estimation by Simulation,” M.I.T. Working Paper.

  • Morikawa, T., D. McFadden, and M. Ben-Akiva. (1990). “Incorporating Psychometric Data in Econometric Travel Demand Models,” Kyoto Univ. Working Paper.

  • Newey, W., and T. Stoker. (1989). “Efficiency Properties of Average Derivative Estimators,” MIT Working Paper.

  • Pakes, A., and D. Pollard. (1989). “Simulation and the Asymptotics of Optimization Estimators,”Econometrica 57.

  • Rust, J. (1987). “Optimal Replacement of GMC Bus Engines: An Empirical Model of Harold Zurcher,”Econometrica 55.

  • Ruud, P. (1981). Misspecification Errors in Limited Dependent Variable Models, MIT, PhD Dissertation.

  • RuudP., and D.McFadden. (1987). “Estimation of limited dependent variable models from the regular exponential family by the method of simulated moments”, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • SeigelA., and F.O'Brien. (1985). “Unbiased Monte Carlo Integration Methods with Exactness for Low Order Polynomials”,SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 6, 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, S. (1990). “Discrete Choice Models and Unobserved Heterogeneity,” U. Va. Working Paper.

  • StockJ., and D.Wise. (1990). “The Pension Inducement to Retire: An Option Value Analysis”, in D.Wise (ed)Issues in the Economics of Aging, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Train, K., D. McFadden, and A. Goett. (1987). “Consumer attitudes and voluntary rate schedules for public utilities,”Review of Economics and Statistics 383–391.

  • TverskyA. (1972). “Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice”,Psychological Review 79, 281–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • WestinR. (1974). “Predictions from binary choice models”,Journal of Econometrics 2, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

In collaboration with Denis Bolduc, David Bunch, Michael Keane, Don Kridel, and Steve Stern.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McFadden, D. Advances in computation, statistical methods, and testing of discrete choice models. Market Lett 2, 215–229 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404073

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404073

Key words

Navigation