Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 263–269 | Cite as

Influence of shear rate and temperature on the crystallization of spontaneous crystallizing glass-ceramic

  • T. Seidel
  • C. Friedrich


The influence of shear rate and temperature on the viscosity and microstructure of phlogopit glass-ceramic during cooling is investigated. Viscosity was measured in the crystallization temperature range. These experiments were carried out using a high-temperature Couette viscometer specially developed for this investigation. All samples were sectioned, polished, and examined by light microscopy after cooling to room temperature. It is shown that the viscosity of the melt decreases with increasing shear rate because the initial platelets (glimmer crystals) were fragmented by shearing. The resulting glass-ceramic has a high density of broken short crystals. Such a structure has not previously been recorded for this material. A mathematical model to calculate the viscosity of crystallizing glass-ceramic depending on shear rate, temperature and other parameters is presented. This model is based on two modified first-order ordinary differential equations to describe crystal nucleation and crystal growth, and an equation to calculate the viscosity of the resulting suspension. The model also includes a description of crystal fragmentation as a first trial. The equations are coupled by melt viscosity. Numerical solutions are discussed.


Polymer Viscosity Microstructure Microscopy Differential Equation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    T. U. Kaup, PhD Dissertation, TH Aachen, 1989.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. C. Flemings, R. G. Riek andK. P. Young,Mater. Sci. Engng 25 (1976) 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Ichikawa andS. Ishizuka,Trans. Jpn Inst. Metals 28 (1987) 145.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. A. El-Mahallawy, N. Fat-Halla andM. A. Taha, in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Mechanical Behaviour of Materials, Stockholm, Sweden, 1983, edited by J. Carlsson and N. G. Olson (1983) p. 695.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Reif,Sprechsaal 120 (1987) 510.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    CH. Friedrich andTh. Seidel, Report No. 25/1990 (AdW der DDR, Institut für Mechanik Chemnitz, 1990).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    U. Schiffner, PhD Dissertation, TU Erlangen, 1984.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. D. Zanotto andP. F. James,J. Non-Cryst. Solids 74 (1985) 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. D. Zanotto,ibid. 89 (1987) 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. Vogel, Glaschemie (Deutscher Verlag für Grundstoffindustrie, Leipzig, 1979).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. I. Tanner, “Engineering Rheology” (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1985).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. B. Metzner,J. Rheol. 29 (1985) 739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. K. Gupta andS. G. Seshadri,ibid. 30 (1986) 505.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky andW. T. Vetterling, “Numerical Recipes” (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Seidel
    • 1
  • C. Friedrich
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of MechanicsChemnitzGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Macromolecular ChemistryUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations