Computers and the Humanities

, Volume 10, Issue 6, pp 333–342 | Cite as

On the measurement of alliteration in poetry

  • Jay A. Leavitt
Article

Abstract

This work is a preliminary study of methods to quantify alliteration. Ten pieces made up of poetry and prose (literary and non-literary) were used to create test sets. Three forms of each test set were examined: texts transcribed in IPA notational equivalent, in Chomsky and Halle features, and in Fromkin and Rodman features. Tests included the deletion of vowels, the weighting of the initial sounds, and the weighting of types according to their frequency in the population of the set. The various configurations were analyzed using a gap-recurrence method. Rankings were obtained by combining measures both of high frequency and of clustering properties. The resulting rankings compare not unfavorably with an intuitive ranking.

Keywords

Computational Linguistic Resulting Ranking Cluster Property Prose Initial Sound 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Skinner, B. F. The alliteration in Shakespeare's Sonnets: A study in literary behavior. The psychological Record, 3, p. 186–92 (1939).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wright, N. B. Measuring Alliteration: a study in method.Computers in the Humanities (ed. J. L. Mitchell. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 82–93 (1974).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bailey, R. W. Statistics and the Sounds of Poetry. Poetics, 1, pp. 16–37 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lindsay, V. The Congo.Chief Modern Poets of Poets of Britain and America, 5th ed. (ed. G. De Witt Sanders, J. H. Nelson, M. L. Rosenthal). New York: Macmillan. Section I, II, pp. 114 (1970).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Conrad, J. Heart of Darkness.Heart of Darkness and the Secret Sharer. New York: Signet. pp. 65 (1950).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pound, E. The Seafarer.Beowulf and Other Old English Poems (ed. C. E. Hieatt). New York: Odyssey Press, P. 110 (1967).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jeffers, R. Fire on the Hills. See [4], section II, p. 221.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shakespeare, W. Sonnet 30.The Complete Signet Shakespeare (ed. S. Barret. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. P. 1735 (1972).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hopkins, G. M.. The Windhover. See [4], section I, p. 61.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Orwell, G. Politics and the English Language.The Borzoi College Reader, 2nd ed., shorter ed. (ed. C. Muscatine, M. Griffith). New York: Knopf. P. 79 (1974).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Plato, The Crito. See [10], p. 288.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mickel, A. B. University Computing Center SNOBOL IV User's Manual, University of Minnesota mimeograph. P. 2. (August 1972).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fromkin, V. and Rodman, R.An Introduction to Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston (1974).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    See [13], p. 53.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chomsky, N., and Halle, M.The Sound Patterns of English. New York: Harper & Row, Pp. 176–7 (1968).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Spang-Hanssen, H. Typological and Statistical Aspects of Distribution as a Criterion in Linguistic Analysis,Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Linguists, Oslo (1957).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leavitt, J. and Mitchell, J. L. “SPAN: A Lexicostatistical Measure and Some Applications” University of Minnesota, Computer Science Dept.Tech Report '76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pergamon Press 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jay A. Leavitt
    • 1
  1. 1.computer science departmentUniversity of MinnesotaUSA

Personalised recommendations