Computers and the Humanities

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 17–23 | Cite as

Computer applications in archaeology

  • George L. Cowgill


Computational Linguistic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Ascher, M., andR. Ascher 1963 Chronological Ordering by Computer.American Anthropologist 65 (5):1045–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Binford, Lewis R. 1963A Proposed Attribute List for the Description and Classification of Projectile Points. University of Michigan Anthropological Papers 19:193–221.Google Scholar
  3. Binford, L. R., and S. R. 1966 A Preliminary Analysis of Functional Variability in the Mousterian of Levallois Facies.American Anthropologist 68 (2), part 2, 238–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, J. A., andL. G. Freeman, Jr. 1964 A UNIVAC Analysis of Sherd Frequencies from the Carter Ranch Pueblo, Eastern Arizona.American Antiquity 30 (2):162–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chenhall, Robert G. 1967 The Description of Archaeological Data in Computer Language.American Antiquity 32 (2):161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christophe, J., andJ. Deshayes 1964Index de l'Outillage sur cartes perforées: outils de l'âge du Bronze, des Balkans à l'Indus. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris.Google Scholar
  7. Cowgill, George L. 1966 Evaluación Preliminar de la Aplicación de Métodos a Máquinas Computadoras a los Datos del Mapa de Teotihuacán. Ms.Google Scholar
  8. Deetz, James 1965The Dynamics of Stylistic Change in Arikara Ceramics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
  9. Doran, J. E., andF. R. Hodson 1966 A Digital Computer Analysis of Palaeolithic Flint Assemblages.Nature 210:688–689.Google Scholar
  10. Eliseeff, V. 1965 Possibilités du scalogramme dans l'étude des bronzes Chinois archaïques.Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines 11:1–10.Google Scholar
  11. Freeman, L. G., Jr., andJ. A. Brown 1964 Statistical Analysis of Carter Ranch Pottery. Fieldiana:Anthropology 55:126–154. Chicago Natural History Museum.Google Scholar
  12. Gardin, Jean-Claude 1967 Methods for the Descriptive Analysis of Archaeological Material.American Antiquity 32 (1):13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hodson, F. R., P. H. A. Sneath, andJ. E. Doran 1966 Some Experiments in the Numerical Analysis of Archaeological Data.Biometrika 53:311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hymes, Dell, ed. 1965The Use of Computers in Anthropology. Mouton & Co.Google Scholar
  15. Jennings, Jesse D. 1964 Information on University of Utah Computer Study. Ms.Google Scholar
  16. Krieger, Alex D. 1964 New World Lithic Typology Project: Part II.American Antiquity 29 (4):489–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuzara, R. S., G. R. Mead, andK. A. Dixon 1966 Seriation of Anthropological Data: A Computer Program for Matrix-Ordering.American Anthropologist 68 (6): 1442–1455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Longacre, William A. 1964 Archaeology as Anthropology: a Case Study.Science 144: 1454–1455.Google Scholar
  19. McGimsey, C. R. III, andD. Green 1965 IBM Ceramic Code Outline, University of Arkansas Museum. Ms.Google Scholar
  20. McPherron, Alan 1963 Programming the IBM 7090 for Optimizing Taxonomy in Archaeology. Ms.Google Scholar
  21. Shepard, A. O. 1957 Ceramics for Archaeologists. Carnegie Institution of Washington.Google Scholar
  22. Warren, Bruce W. 1965 Computers and Research in Archaeology. Ms.Google Scholar
  23. Weyer, Edward M., Jr. 1964 New World Lithic Typology Project: Part I.American Antiquity 29 (4):487–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Queens College of the City University of New York 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • George L. Cowgill
    • 1
  1. 1.Brandeis UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations