Computers and the Humanities

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 217–229 | Cite as

Narrow phonetic transcription on the computer: Taking the phone off the hook

  • Gerald C. Keil


Computational Linguistic Phonetic Transcription 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Churchhouse, R. L., and S. Hockey. “The Use of an SC4020 for Output of a Concordance Program,”The Computer in Literary and Linguistic Research, ed. R. A. Wisbey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1971), 221–230.Google Scholar
  2. de Tollenaere, F. “Encoding Techniques in Dutch Historical Lexicography,”Computers and the Humanities 6, 3 (January 1972), 147–152.Google Scholar
  3. Edinburgh, University of, Department of Linguistics,Notes on Speech Synthesis by Rule. Internal document (April, 1970).Google Scholar
  4. Francis, W. N., J. Swartvik, and G. M. Rubin. “Computer-Produced Representation of Dialectical Variation: Initial Fricatives in Southern British English,”Coling. Stockholm: International Conference on Computational Linguistics (1969).Google Scholar
  5. Gerber, S. E. “Scientific Computation in Speech Research,”Computer Studies in the Humanities and Verbal Behavior 2 (1969), 91–97.Google Scholar
  6. Holmes, J. N., I. G. Mattingly, and J. N. Shearme. “Speech Synthesis by Rule,”Language and Speech 7, 3 (July–September 1964), 127–143.Google Scholar
  7. Huffman, D. A. “A method for the Construction of Minimum Redundancy Codes,”Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, 4D, 9 (1952), 1098–1101.Google Scholar
  8. Johnson, R. L.An Extended Algol for Language Processing. Symposium on the Use of Computers in Literary Research, Edinburgh (March 1972).Google Scholar
  9. Orton, Harold, et al.Survey of English Dialects. Leeds: E. J. Arnold & Son (1962–1971).Google Scholar
  10. Oswalt, R. T. “The Detection of Remote Linguistic Relationships,”Computer Studies in the Humanities and Verbal Behavior 3, 3 (October 1970), 117–129.Google Scholar
  11. Rubin, G. M. “Computer-Produced Mapping of Dialectal Variation,”Computers and the Humanities 4, 4 (March 1970), 241–256.Google Scholar
  12. Shaw, D.Statistical Analysis of Dialectal Distribution: Preliminary Report. Internal document: University of Kent, Canterbury (1972).Google Scholar
  13. Wells, M. “File Compression Using Variable Length Encodings,”The Computer Journal 15, 4 (November 1972), 308–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pergamon Press, Inc 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald C. Keil
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Leeds.U.K.

Personalised recommendations