Skip to main content
Log in

A bench-scale rock-plant filter investigation

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three bench-scale rock filters containing 0.6 m of gravel were used in this investigation. Two of the filters were planted withSagittaria Iancifolia andScirpus validus, while the third filter was an unvegetated control filter. The wastewater directed through these systems was a synthetic mixture containing nutrient broth as the carbon source. An 80-day experiment was run on the filters using eight combinations of two flow rates and four influent biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) concentrations, each combination remaining constant for ten days. These combinations resulted in BOD5 surface loadings from 4.63–30.96 g/day/m2. From other studies of batch and continuous flow rock-plant filter systems, the first-order BOD5 reaction rate constant was found to decrease exponentially with detention time. In this study, however, little correlation was found between BOD5 loading rate and removal percentages, which averaged 69%, 57%, and 47% for theScirpus, Sagittaria, and control systems, respectively. This is probably due to the relatively small change in detention times studied and the short time period of each loading rate. Oxidation/reduction potential (ORP) and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements within these systems indicated that no free oxygen was available at any depth. Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) removal was higher in the plant systems relative to the control, with theScirpus system achieving a higher overall removal than theSagittaria system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation: 1984,Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th edition, Washington, D.C., American Public Health Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, W.: 1964, ‘Oxygen Diffusion from the Roots of Some British Bog Plants’,Nature 204 (4960), 801–802.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, P., DeBusk, T.A., Reddy, K.R., and Koopman, B.: 1991, ‘Vegetated Submerged Beds with Artificial Substrates. I: BOD Removal’,ASCE Journal of Environmental Engineering 117 (4), 394–407.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bavor, H.J., Roser, D.J., Fisher, P.J., and Smalls, I.C.: 1989, ‘Performance of Solid-Matrix Wetland Systems Viewed as Fixed-Film Bioreactors’,Constructed Wetlands from Wastewater Treatment: Municipal, Industrial, and Agricultural, D.A. Hammer (Ed.), Lewis Publishers, Inc., pp. 646–656.

  • Brix, H.: 1990, ‘Gas Exchange Through the Soil-Atmosphere Interphase and Through Dead Culms ofPhragmites australis in a Constructed Reed Bed Receiving Domestic Sewage’,Water Research 24 (2), 259–266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Findlater, B.C., Hobson, J.A., and Cooper, P.F.: 1990, ‘Reed Bed Treatment Systems: Performance Evaluation’,Constructed Wetlands in Water Pollution Control, P.F. Cooper and B.C. Findlater (Eds.), Pergamon Press, Oxford, U.K., pp. 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersberg, R.M., Elkins, B.V., Lyon, S.R., and Goldman, C.R.: 1986, ‘Role of Aquatic Plants in Wastewater Treatment by Artificial Wetlands’,Water Resources 20 (3), 363–368.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, G.J.: 1985,Cultivating Reeds (Phragmites australis) for Root Zone Treatment of Sewage, Project Report 965, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Cumbria, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, J.J. and Kingsley, J.B.: 1989, ‘Waste Treatment for Confined Swine with an Integrated Artificial Wetland and Aquaculture System’,Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment, D.A. Hammer (Ed.), Chelsea, Mich: Lewis Publishers, Inc., pp. 191–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangler, F.L., Sloey, W.E., and Fetter, C.W.: 1976, ‘Artificial and Natural Marshes as Wastewater Treatment Systems in Wisconsin’, presented at ‘Freshwater Wetlands and Sewage Effluent Disposal: Ecosystem Impacts, Economics, and Feasibility’, May 10–11, Univ. of Mich., Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trautmann, N.M., Martin, J.H., Porter, K.S., and Hawk, K.C.: 1989, ‘Use of Artificial Wetlands for Treatment of Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Leachate’,Constructed Wetlands from Wastewater Treatment: Municipal, Industrial, and Agricultural, D.A. Hammer (Ed.), Lewis Publishers, Inc., pp. 245–251.

  • Wolverton, B.C.: 1982, ‘Hybrid Wastewater Treatment System Using Anaerobic Microorganisms and Reed (Phragmites communis)’,Economic Botany 36 (4), 373–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton, B.C., McDonald, R.C., and Duffer, W.R.: 1983, ‘Microorganisms and Higher Plants for Wastewater Treatment’,Journal of Evnironmental Quality 12 (2), 236–242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton, B.C.: 1987, ‘Aquatic Plants for Wastewater Treatment: An Overview’, inAquatic Plants for Water Treatment and Resource Recovery, K.R. Reddy and W.H. Smith (Eds.), Orlando, FL: Magnolia Publishing, Inc., p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. and Hensman, L.C.: 1989, ‘Research to Develop Engineering Guidelines for Implementation of Constructed Wetlands in Wastewater Treatment in Southern Africa’,Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment, D.A. Hammer (Ed.), Chelsea, Mich: Lewis Publishers, Inc., pp. 581–589.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skipper, D., Tittlebaum, M. A bench-scale rock-plant filter investigation. Environ Monit Assess 27, 69–80 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02401765

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02401765

Keywords

Navigation