Skip to main content
Log in

Looking through the postdisaster policy window

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Policy windows are transitory opportunities during which the likelihood of adopting new policy or legislative proposals is greater than usual. Accepted wisdom has held that natural disasters serve as focusing events that generate policy windows in their wake. This paper highlights the need for a more circumscribed understanding of when and where policy windows occur based on the experiences of three US regional planning organizations: a hand-picked commission of community leaders, a council of governments, and a special-purpose substate organization. The first operated in the San Francisco Bay Area of California following the Loma Prieta earthquake (October 1989), and the other two in South Carolina's Atlantic coastal plain after Hurricane Hugo (September 1989). The analysis concludes that natural disasters did not transform the agenda or mission of these entities. Policy windows were neither automatic outcomes of focusing events nor did they ensure the adoption of pertinent policy within the organizations investigated. Several conditions are minimally necessary for using policy windows to bring about hazard mitigation: comprehensive institutional conceptualization of hazards management, institutional strength and flexibility, and well-placed, effective policy entrepreneurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Alesch, D., and W. J. Petak. The politics and economics of earthquake hazard mitigation. Program on Environment and Behavior Monograph #43. Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado.

  • Anon. 1989. After Hugo: B-C-D responds with innovation, intensity.National Association of Regional Councils, Regional reporter. 1(1):1–7.

  • Bay Vision 2020. 1991. The Commission Report. Bay Vision 2020, San Francisco.

  • Beatley, T. 1990. Managing reconstruction along the South Carolina coast: preliminary observations on the implementation of the Beachfront Management Act following Hurricane Hugo. Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, Boulder, Colorado. Quick Response Research Report #38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatley, T., S., Manter, and R. Platt. 1992. Erosion as a political hazard: Folly Beach after Hugo.In Coastal erosion, has retreat sounded? R. Platt, H. C. Miller, T. Beatley, J. Melville, and B. G. Mathenia. Institute of Behavioral Science, The University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado. Monograph #53 pp. 112–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berke, P. R. and T. Beatley. 1992. Planning for earthquakes, risk, politics and policy. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • BCD COG (Berkeley-Charleston-Dorchester Council of Governments) no date a. Disaster analysis & recovery tracking system, project description. Berkeley-Charleston-Dorchester Council of Governments, Charleston, South Carolina. Management and planning systems program document.

  • BCD COG. no date b. Disaster analysis & recovery tracking system, Project management report: Dorchester County and the region. Berkeley-Charleston-Dorchester Council of Governments, Charleston, South Carolina. Management and planning systems program document.

  • Bodovitz, J. 1990. Notes from Bay Vision 2020 meeting, 14 December 1989-11, February, 1991, meeting 1–28. Bay Vision 2020, San Francisco. From record of the 17 December 1990 meeting.

  • Bolin, R. 1990. The Loma Prieta earthquake: An overview in the Loma Prieta earthquake: Studies of short-term impacts. Program on Environment and Behavior Monograph #50. Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burby, R., and S. French. 1985. Flood plain land use management: A national assessment. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carolan, M. 1990. Regional approaches to environmental management.Public Management 72(2):15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, K. S. 1990. Interstate cooperation: Resurgence of multistate regionalism.The Journal of State Government 63(3):59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, R. W., and C. D. Elder. 1983. Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda building, 2nd ed. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M., J. March, and J. Olsen. 1972. A garbage can model or organizational choice.Administrative Science Quarterly 17(1):1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, W. R. 1990. Regional problem solving in the 1990s: Experimentation with local governance for the 21st century. National Civic Review 79(4):354–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T. E., A. H. Mushkatel, and T. S. Kilijanek. 1983. Earthquake mitigation policy. Program on Environment and Behavior Monograph #37. Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, R., III. 1990. Northeast promotes recycling markets.The Journal of State Government 63(3):64–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. 1989. Planning, politics, and the environment.Journal of the American Planning Association 55(3):334–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D. 1989. Notes from Bay Vision 2020 meeting, 14 December 1989-11 February 1991, meeting 1–28. Bay Vision 2020, San Francisco. From record of the December 14, 1989 meeting.

  • Hawkins, W. F. 1990. The lower Mississippi Delta: A region in transition.The Journal of state Government. 63(3):67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, W. W. 1989. Knowledge utilization. Pp. 155–183in W. W. Hays (ed.), Proceedings of conference XLVIII. Workshop on earthquake hazards in the Puget Sound, Portland area, Portland, Oregon, 28–30 March. US Geological Survey Open File Report 89-465. US Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janiskee, R. L. 1990. Storm of the century: Hurricane Hugo and its impact on South Carolina.Southeastern Geographer 30(1):63–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. W. 1984. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, S. 1988. Policy options: The Los Angeles experience. Pages 229–303in W. W. Hays (ed.), Proceedings of conference XLII. Workshop on evaluation of earthquake hazards and risk in the Puget Sound and Portland areas, Olympia, Washington, 12–15 April. US Geological Survey Open File Report 88-541. US Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, P., and W. Williams. 1986. Disaster Policy Implementation. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palm, R. 1990. Natural hazards, An integrative framework for research and planning. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, R. H. 1986. Metropolitan flood loss reduction through regional special districts.Journal of the American Planning Association 52(4):467–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, R. H. (ed.) 1987. Regional management of metropolitan floodplains, Experience in the United States and abroad. Institute of Behavioral Science, The University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado. Monograph #45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, R. H., H. C. Miller, T. Beatley, J. Melville, and B. G. Mathenia. 1992. Coastal erosion, has retreat sounded? Institute of Behavioral Science, The University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado. Monograph #53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, S. H. 1920. Catastrophe and social change. PhD dissertation. Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, R. W. 1990. Radioactive waste compacts for the Northeast states.The Journal of State Government. 63(3):80–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • South Carolina Coastal Council. 1989. Guidelines for the development of local comprehensive beach management plans. South Carolina Coastal Council, Charleston, South Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • South Carolina Coastal Council. 1992a. Preparing for a hurricane: Taking inventory. Memo released from the South Carolina Coastal Council, Office of Public Information.

  • South Carolina Coastal Council. 1992b. The US Supreme Court and the Beachfront Management Act. Memo released from the South Carolina Coastal Council, Office of Public Information.

  • Sprague, D. M. 1990. Introduction: A regional revolution.The Journal of State Government 63(3):57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Federal Insurance Administration and US Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1992. Learning from Hurricane Hugo: Implications for public policy. Prepared for US Federal Insurance Administration and US Federal Emergency Management Agency, Contract no. EMW-9-G 3304, A001.

  • Walker, D. B. 1987. Snow white and the 17 dwarfs: From metro cooperation to governance.National Civic Review 76(1):14–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. L. 1977. Setting the agenda in the US Senate.British Journal of Political Science 7:423–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, G. F. 1988. Path to risk analysis.Risk Analysis 8:171–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. D. and P. H. Rossi. 1981. The politics of natural disaster: State and local elites.In J. D. Wright and P. H. Rossi, eds.), Social science and natural hazards. ABT Books, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 45–67.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solecki, W.D., Michaels, S. Looking through the postdisaster policy window. Environmental Management 18, 587–595 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02400861

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02400861

Key words

Navigation