Biochemical Genetics

, Volume 34, Issue 7–8, pp 287–296 | Cite as

DNA fingerprinting of captive breeding pairs of lesser white-fronted geese (Anser erythropus) with unknown pedigrees

  • Håkan Tegelström
  • Lambart von Essen
Article

Abstract

For a number of decades, the lesser white-fronted goose (Anser erythropus) has been almost-absent from the Fennoscandian fauna and has a current population size of only about 60 breeding pairs, with fewer than 10 pairs in Sweden. During the period 1981–1991 more than 200 young have been reintroduced in northern Sweden. However, the origin and possible relatedness of lesser white-fronted individuals were unknown when the breeding program started. We have used DNA fingerprinting to assess the similarity of 18 individuals, i.e., the entire captive population used for breeding in 1991 and about 60% of the captive population used in 1981–1991. Minisatellite probe 33.15 provided an index for an average similarity of 0.39 between the mates of the 12 breeding pairs used for producing offspring for reintroduction. This is a higher similarity than in natural populations of birds in general but lower than in populations that have passed through serious population bottlenecks. Individuals originating from different breeders are more dissimilar than those from the same breeder. However, the close relationships (similarity, 0.5–0.6) found in a group of five individuals from different breeders show that selecting individuals from different breeding groups is not sufficient to prevent mating between closely related individuals.

Key words

DNA fingerprinting lesser white-fronted goose Anser erythropus reintroduction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bischof, L. L., and Duffield, D. A. (1994). Relatedness estimation of captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximas) by DNA fingerprinting.Zoo Biol. 1377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burke, T. (1989). DNA fingerprinting and other methods for the study of mating success.Trends Ecol. Evol. 4139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Choudhury, S., Jones, C. S., Black, J. M., and Prop, J. (1993). Adoption of young and intraspecific nest parasitism in barnacle geese.Condor 95860.Google Scholar
  4. Gilbert, D. A., Packer, C., Pusey, A. E., Stephens, J. C., and O'Brien, S. J. (1991). Analytical DNA fingerprinting in lions: Parentage, genetic diversity and kinship.J. Hered. 82378.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Grunder, A. A., Sabour, M. P., and Gavora, J. S. (1994). Estimates of relatedness and inbreeding in goose strains from DNA fingerprints.Anim. Genet. 2581.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Haig, S. M., Ballou, J. D., and Casna, N. J. (1994). Identification of kin structure among Guam rail founders: A comparison of pedigrees and DNA profiles.Mol. Ecol. 3109.Google Scholar
  7. Jeffreys, A. J., Wilson, V., and Thein, S. L. (1985). Hypervariable “minisatellite” regions in human DNA.Nature 31467.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones, C. S., Lessells, C. M., and Krebs, J. R. (1991). Helpers-at-the-nest in European bee-eaters (Merops apiaster): A genetic analysis. In Burke, T., Dolf, G., Jeffreys, J., and Wolff, R. (eds.),DNA Fingerprinting: Approaches and Applications Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, pp. 169–192.Google Scholar
  9. Laikre, L., Tegelström, H., and Gelter, H. P. (1992). DNA fingerprints of captive wolves (Canis lupus).Hereditas 117293.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Larsson, K., Tegelström, H., and Forslund, P. (1995). Intraspecific nest parasitism and adoption of young in the barnacle goose: Effects on survival and reproductive performance.Anim. Behav. 501349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lehman, N., Clarkson, P., Mech, L. D., Meier, T. J., and Wayne, R. K. (1992). A study of the genetic relationships within and among wolf packs using DNA fingerprinting and mitochondrial DNA.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 3083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Longmire, J. L., Gee, G. F., Hardekopf, C. L., and Mark, G. A. (1992). Establishing paternity in Whooping cranes (Grus americana) by DNA analysis.Auk 109522.Google Scholar
  13. Lynch, M. (1988). Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting.Mol. Biol. Evol. 5584.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mannen, H., Tsuji, S., Mukai, F., Goto, N., and Ohtagaki, S. (1993). Genetic similarity using DNA fingerprinting in cattle to determine relationship coefficient.J. Hered. 84166.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Norderhaug, A., and Norderhaug, M. (1984). Status of the lesser white-fronted goose,Anser erythropus, in Fennoscandia.Swedish Wildlife Res. 13171.Google Scholar
  16. Rave, E. H. (1995). Genetic analysis of wild populations of Hawaiian geese using DNA fingerprinting.Condor 9782.Google Scholar
  17. Sterbetz, I. (1982). Migration ofAnser erythropus andBranta ruficollis in Hungary 1971–1980.Aquila 89107.Google Scholar
  18. Tegelström, H., and Sjöberg, G. (1995). Introduced Swedish Canada geese (Branta canadensis) have low levels of genetic variation as revealed by DNA fingerprinting.J. Evol. Biol. 8195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Triggs, S. J., Williams, M. J., Marshall, S. J., and Chambers, G. K. (1991). Genetic relationships within a population of blue duckHymenolaimus malacorhynchos.Wildfowl 4287.Google Scholar
  20. Triggs, S. J., Williams, M. J., Marshall, S. J., and Chambers, G. K. (1992). Genetic structure of blue duck (Hymenolaimus malacorhynchos) populations revealed by DNA fingerprinting.Auk 10980.Google Scholar
  21. Vassart, G., Georges, M., Monsiur, R., Brocas, H., Lequarré, A.-S., and Christophe, D. (1987). A sequence in M13 phage detects hypervariable minisatellites in human and animal DNA.Science 235683.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. von Essen, L. (1991). A note on the lesser white-fronted gooseAnser erythropus in Sweden and the result of a re-introduction scheme.Ardea 79305.Google Scholar
  23. Wetton, J. H., Carter, R. E., Parkin, D. T., and Walters, D. (1987). Demographic study of a wild house sparrow population by DNA-fingerprinting.Nature 327147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Håkan Tegelström
    • 1
  • Lambart von Essen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GeneticsUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Öster-Malma Game Management SchoolSwedish Hunters' AssociationBjörnlundaSweden

Personalised recommendations