DNA fingerprinting of captive breeding pairs of lesser white-fronted geese (Anser erythropus) with unknown pedigrees
For a number of decades, the lesser white-fronted goose (Anser erythropus) has been almost-absent from the Fennoscandian fauna and has a current population size of only about 60 breeding pairs, with fewer than 10 pairs in Sweden. During the period 1981–1991 more than 200 young have been reintroduced in northern Sweden. However, the origin and possible relatedness of lesser white-fronted individuals were unknown when the breeding program started. We have used DNA fingerprinting to assess the similarity of 18 individuals, i.e., the entire captive population used for breeding in 1991 and about 60% of the captive population used in 1981–1991. Minisatellite probe 33.15 provided an index for an average similarity of 0.39 between the mates of the 12 breeding pairs used for producing offspring for reintroduction. This is a higher similarity than in natural populations of birds in general but lower than in populations that have passed through serious population bottlenecks. Individuals originating from different breeders are more dissimilar than those from the same breeder. However, the close relationships (similarity, 0.5–0.6) found in a group of five individuals from different breeders show that selecting individuals from different breeding groups is not sufficient to prevent mating between closely related individuals.
Key wordsDNA fingerprinting lesser white-fronted goose Anser erythropus reintroduction
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Choudhury, S., Jones, C. S., Black, J. M., and Prop, J. (1993). Adoption of young and intraspecific nest parasitism in barnacle geese.Condor 95860.Google Scholar
- Haig, S. M., Ballou, J. D., and Casna, N. J. (1994). Identification of kin structure among Guam rail founders: A comparison of pedigrees and DNA profiles.Mol. Ecol. 3109.Google Scholar
- Jones, C. S., Lessells, C. M., and Krebs, J. R. (1991). Helpers-at-the-nest in European bee-eaters (Merops apiaster): A genetic analysis. In Burke, T., Dolf, G., Jeffreys, J., and Wolff, R. (eds.),DNA Fingerprinting: Approaches and Applications Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, pp. 169–192.Google Scholar
- Longmire, J. L., Gee, G. F., Hardekopf, C. L., and Mark, G. A. (1992). Establishing paternity in Whooping cranes (Grus americana) by DNA analysis.Auk 109522.Google Scholar
- Norderhaug, A., and Norderhaug, M. (1984). Status of the lesser white-fronted goose,Anser erythropus, in Fennoscandia.Swedish Wildlife Res. 13171.Google Scholar
- Rave, E. H. (1995). Genetic analysis of wild populations of Hawaiian geese using DNA fingerprinting.Condor 9782.Google Scholar
- Sterbetz, I. (1982). Migration ofAnser erythropus andBranta ruficollis in Hungary 1971–1980.Aquila 89107.Google Scholar
- Triggs, S. J., Williams, M. J., Marshall, S. J., and Chambers, G. K. (1991). Genetic relationships within a population of blue duckHymenolaimus malacorhynchos.Wildfowl 4287.Google Scholar
- Triggs, S. J., Williams, M. J., Marshall, S. J., and Chambers, G. K. (1992). Genetic structure of blue duck (Hymenolaimus malacorhynchos) populations revealed by DNA fingerprinting.Auk 10980.Google Scholar
- von Essen, L. (1991). A note on the lesser white-fronted gooseAnser erythropus in Sweden and the result of a re-introduction scheme.Ardea 79305.Google Scholar